Tort Law Case Study

Decent Essays
From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued
The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.
Hammond Meredith’s vs. Elite Matchmaker Kailen Rosenberg
In 2012, a wealthy, love-driven Hammond Meredith, hired elite matchmaker Kailen Rosenberg to help him find love. Over the course of a few years, Meredith spent
…show more content…
The new strategy involved Meredith investing in a business called the “The Lodge.” The lawsuit claims that Rosenberg insisted that an investment in the club will help him find the love he has so desperately sought since 2012. After investing $50,000, Meredith still had not found love. In fact, the lawsuit claims that the business venture was not as Rosenberg described at all; it did not have millions from investors, and the business plan was non-existent.
Understanding Tort Law in Florida
Tort laws is a complex law. It is a common law that essentially covers civil wrongs, much like what Meredith is claiming in his case against Rosenberg. In this case, Meredith could recover compensatory damages if he is found be harmed by the business practices of Rosenberg.
When it comes to civil cases like the one Meredith is currently involved in, as the plaintiff, Meredith is responsible for proving his case. He is responsible for demonstrating that he paid the money to her based on her expert recommendation. As a result of believing in her, he was injured. Ultimately, Meredith has the burden of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Niles had every right to file a lawsuit against the City of San Rafael because there was a breach of duty that caused foreseeable damage to the Kelly. If Kelly would have suffered no harm, then that would have not been grounds to sue. Mr. Niles won the case because he was able to prove that all four elements of negligence were present. Mr. Niles was able to prove that duty of care was not properly conducted. Duty is defined as the legal obligation of care, performance, or observance to safeguard the rights of others.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Video Response: Lawsuit- School Negligence Rose-Gaelle Labranche St. Thomas University Video Response: Lawsuit- School Negligence The situation that occurred in Hope Academy Charter School in Grand Rapids may leave the school liable regarding the rape of the 14-year-old student. This student suffers from emotional, mental and behavioral disorders; that is typically why she was enrolled in this school, as school personnel are trained to deal with such disorders. Although the student was acting up resulting to a suspension for the day, she should not have been released from the school campus without parental escort as stated in her records.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jan Shlichtmann Essay

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main point of the film is to disclose the lawsuit, civil action and issues that developed and arose in the true event. The film was created to display the civil case that begun and health and environmental issues in Woburn, Massachusetts. The film begins where Attorney Jan Schlichtmann is in court representing his client, a young Anglo-Saxon male who became disabled and is in a wheelchair. The scene then introduces Schlichtmann in a radio show.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McClanahan likely has an attorney negligence claim against Barrington because he did not base his advice on adequate knowledge or reasonable legal research. Attorneys are liable to their clients for negligent performance of their duties. Smith 356 Davis 886 Aloy 416. Attorneys should perform their duties with the “skill, prudence and diligence” of a lawyer of ordinary skill. Smith 356.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537, the High Court was forced to rule on the validity of awarding damages for a “loss of a chance” in medical negligence. In the judgement of this case the High Court considered the distinction between a Medical and Commercial “Lost Chance”. Following the English case Gregg v Scott [2005] 2 AC 176, the High Court unanimously rejected the claimants action for damages due to a lost chance at a better medical outcome. Gummow ACJ highlighted the difference between a loss of chance in contract, where the occurrence of a breach can bring the action, and negligence, where the action relies on if and when damage was sustained.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The damages awarded in a law suit not only affects the parties directly involved. The myth of there being an abundance frivolous lawsuit is brought about by the big businesses. Corporations and insurance companies have framed several legitimate lawsuits as frivolous and the fabricated statistics are spread to the public to cause fear.5 The fear will also assist in passing tort reform laws to help ease the pain of excessive amounts being paid out in damages.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To review a copy of the suppliers shipping records I would use the discovery method of document production. For document production I would need to submit a written request for the suppliers shipping records. To preserve the testimony of the Alaskan fisherman I would use the discovery method of deposition. A deposition is a formal questioning of a witness outside of court that is transcribed by a court reporter and can be referenced during trial. To get the supplier to admit before trial, that he stopped his delivery of crab to David, I would submit a request for admission.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a client files a claim for malpractice, it is the medical malpractice attorney's job to secure him or her damages for the pain and suffering which resulted from a doctor's negligence. In cases of death, the attorney attempts to college damages for the family of the deceased. This can be a complicated procedure, as malpractice laws and regulations, particularly the statute of limitations, may vary from state to state. There are two types of damages available to victims of medical malpractice. A successful malpractice attorney may be able to secure the client both compensatory, as well as punitive, damages.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence Tort

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This takes place with car injuries, property damage, and any other type of situation that needs to be paid for. There are three categories that fall under tort law. The first type of tort is intentional tort. This takes place when a business purposely cause harm onto someone else. If an issue is taken to court a plaintiff or defendant will request compensatory damages and punitive damages.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States legal system protects business owners and employees from being affected by constant moving of technology that is upgrading all the time in the world. There are laws set in place to protect business' and other people from being liable for an incident that may have happened under the supervision of one person. Torts are wrong doings that are committed by one person or party against another. Torts are extremely important to know about in business, especially if one wants to be involved in owning a business or anything to do with a higher up rank. They are violations that are included in civil law.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In these two chapters, Epp provides a detailed analysis of what he calls legalized accountability and its development. After noticing a shortcoming after the rights revolution in the 1960’s and 1970’s in which local bureaucracies failed to recognize the rights recognized by the Supreme Court, Epp analyzes a way in which activists took to the courts to enact social change. He argues that the expansion of tort law and liability litigation through the cases of Monroe v Pape and Monell v Department of Social Services helped create more onus on bureaucracies to protect and respect rights granted by the Supreme Court and he evaluates how these bureaucracies responded to the threat of liability litigation in the form of legalized accountability. In…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Medical Malpractice is becoming a major issue for healthcare providers. Certainly, there are legitimate concerns on each side of side of the debate. The cost of malpractice insurance and the threat of being sued influences doctors. This could be a reason why more and more doctors are becoming more cautious and performing tests and procedures that may not be necessary in the patients diagnose.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are certain factors that may occur and lead to a cut causal relationship and fall under the so-called foreign reason which is defined as "any act or a particular incident does not belong to the actor and leads to the inevitable damage occurs Msthi not, and the most prominent images of foreign why: 1. fortuitous event or force majeure which can not be predicted or avoided, and would make Msthi or not is a separate incident, the will of the debtor can not be predicted or resist implementation. 2. injured error: so it is possible that the patient work or his behavior that led to the injury thereby eliminating the responsibility and the lesson to be injured error can not be predicted or paid or realized so that there is no way to avoid the accident. 3.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Love on the Line Every day a person can be exposed to hundreds of online dating advertisements, or a coworker divulges how she met her partner on this amazing site. A simple internet search for online dating can produce hundreds of sites in just seconds. The popularity for online dating meets the need of today’s society for convenience. With just a few clicks of a mouse, witty phrases, and the perfect photo a computer will analyze potential matches. Simple, quick, and with minimal effort, someone is ready to start dating.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays