Negligence Case

Improved Essays
To review a copy of the suppliers shipping records I would use the discovery method of document production. For document production I would need to submit a written request for the suppliers shipping records. To preserve the testimony of the Alaskan fisherman I would use the discovery method of deposition. A deposition is a formal questioning of a witness outside of court that is transcribed by a court reporter and can be referenced during trial. To get the supplier to admit before trial, that he stopped his delivery of crab to David, I would submit a request for admission. A request for admission is a written statement that is sent to the other side in which you ask for them to admit or deny the statement. In this particular case it would be “Admit that you stopped your …show more content…
If a person breaches this duty and damages occur as a causation of the breach a person is liable. The damages may occur from the actual causation of the breach or a proximate causation of the breach if the causation is foreseeable.
Analysis: Brian swerved into the gutter to avoid hitting the cat that ran into the street. By running into the gutter he caused a board to break that then hit Susan in the head causing her to lose conscious. Susan then runs off the road and hits Little Johnny causing serious injury.
Conclusion: If Brian was not speeding and as the cat ran into the street, so it was not a case of not paying attention, I would argue that Brian acted as a reasonably prudent person by swerving into the gutter and therefore did not breach duty. I would also argue that it was an unforeseeable event that a piece of wood would be in the gutter and break causing a passing motorist a concussion. Brian is not liable under the tort theory of negligence to Susan and Little Johnny. Susan was unconscious and did not breach duty so she is not liable for the injuries to Little

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this trial, the question the court is being asked to answer is whether Alex Cooper was responsible for his own injuries. Throughout this trial, the law applied was negligence. Negligence is broken down into four parts: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Due to the nature of this trial as a civil suit, the plaintiff had the burden of proof, meaning the burden to prove by the greater weight of the credible evidence.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexis Moss likely will not succeed in a claim of vicarious liability against Hitch, when Piper drove the vehicle involved in the accident that injured Alexis. The Alabama Supreme Court has noted that, “under the doctrine of respondeat superior a principal is vicariously liable for the torts of its agent if the tortious acts are committed within the line and scope of the agent's employment.” Martin v. Goodies Distrib., 695 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Ala 1997). Vicarious liability has two requirements: 1) whether an agent is an employee or independent contractor, and 2) the scope of the agent’s employment.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Law Research Paper

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In other words, the more likely or foreseeable damage or injury will occur, the courts more likely to find that the defendants liability for failing. A person should always be reasonable to take steps to avoid risks even that is a small risks. Therefore, the person will not be negligent if he/she has take steps to avoid the risks, or the risks which a reasonable person would not…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McClanahan likely has an attorney negligence claim against Barrington because he did not base his advice on adequate knowledge or reasonable legal research. Attorneys are liable to their clients for negligent performance of their duties. Smith 356 Davis 886 Aloy 416. Attorneys should perform their duties with the “skill, prudence and diligence” of a lawyer of ordinary skill. Smith 356.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So if a person was walking down a street and tripped on a crack in the sidewalk then they could sue for negligence since the injury came solely from walking and tripping on the crack. However, one can not claim negligence when the injury was caused by something that occurred because of what they were doing or a condition they created. In the Martinez case, Shirley Martinez did not choose to sit behind the net and was not paying attention to what was occurring on the…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Susie V. Tommy Negligence To prove negligence, the defendant must owe a duty to the plaintiff, that duty must be breached, and the defendant’s actions or inactions were the cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Duty Duty is the legal obligation required of an individual to act as a reasonable prudent person under similar circumstances. Drivers are required to act with reasonable care when encountering other vehicles and pedestrians. Tommy was the driver of the vehicle and Susie was a pedestrian.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    • Therefore Barnes had knowledge of Ringo’s category of animal, which resulted in the animal being kept in what was thought to be a secured fenced backyard. 1.4 Is Barnes liable for the harm Ringo caused when he bit Anderson? • Scienter Liability states that when an animal known to be dangerous is kept, that owner is liable for any harm caused. •…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A young child’s infringement of a statute proposed to control the circumstance which delivered damage is in many states held not to constitute negligence in essence or even, in a considerable lot of those which perceive a decisive assumption of inadequacy for negligence in exceptionally youthful kids, allowable proof of carelessness. Where an infringement is allowed to be considered as a major aspect of the confirmation bearing on the subject of contributory negligence, the youngster's obligation to comply with the statute is much of the time held not to be outright, but rather just to constitute such consistence as would commonly be anticipated from children of a similar age, knowledge and involvement in similar conditions. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the law expresses that the time of criminal obligation is 10 years. That acquaints a lawful civil argument as with regardless of whether a youngster would ever be liable of…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Report Sample

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other honorable discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for his separation. The applicant seeks relief, contending, in effect, he swore in at MEPS on 10 November 2010, changed his address when he moved to Texas on 7 December 2010, and went to basic training 22 February 2011. The applicant unit contacted him by phone after AIT, and he reminded them, that he had moved to Texas. The applicant states that he requested a transferred to a new unit where he lived, and the unit said they would take care of it, but he never heard back from them. The applicant contends that he was reassigned and he told the new unit the same thing, but he did not get transferred.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dr. M Negligence Case

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The answer in this case was obvious to the point that Dr. M had failed to perform the duty as Jacob’s caregiver by not performing the right job when examining his wound without using the proper reasonable care-he didn’t wash his hand or put on his glove on when touching the infected area after he examined another person. As a doctor, he clearly understood the risk of not following the hygiene protocols after each patient; it’s was his negligence that caused the consequence. He not only put himself in an unprofessional manner but it put Jacob at the risk of further infections, which could had been prevented. There are four parts to the negligence where Dr. M failed to exercise all. He didn’t perform the duty as Jacob’s doctor and he breached…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hence the plaintiff shall claim damages under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 3b , which is in respect of an intentional act that is done with intention to cause injury or death. In order to successfully sue the defendants for the loss of earnings, Benji must establish the following three basics elements of negligence as defined by Gibson and Fraser (9th Edition) : 1. Does the defendant owe a duty of care to the plaintiff? Duty of care could be established from the neighbor’s test from Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, where it states that your neighbor is any person who is so closely and directly affected by what you do (the idea of proximity). Furthermore, it can be concluded from Fraser v Johnston (1990)…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim Robyn Broadwater Kaplan University October 18, 2016 MEMORANDUM Date: October 18, 2016 To: Candie Cardigan, CEO, CARDWARE Inc. From: Robyn Broadwater Re: Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim ______________________________________________________________________________…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Malpractice Case

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Medical Malpractice Why it went to court. Mary Carnahan HA 210 Medical Law and Ethics October 31, 2014 Introduction We are going to take a medical malpractice case that went to court. Research the case to see why it went to court. I chose a medical malpractice case from Phoenixville, PA.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays