Thoreau And Civil Disobedience Essay

1180 Words 5 Pages
Intro:
In agreement to both Thoreau and King, one must transgress a physical change towards an unjust law with the ideals of civil disobedience. Both leaders had the same concept of ideas about civil rights but, show their point of view differently. Fighting for equal rights in the United States was never easy. The “Declaration of Independence” written by Thomas Jefferson discusses the ideas of equal rights for both men and women. Jefferson explains every single person has the right to be treated as an equal. He continues taking about slave trade, and how African Americans should have the same liberty as white Americans. The Declaration of Independence stated its basic rights and liberties as an American. Henry Thoreau and Martin Luther King
…show more content…
He explained, citizens shouldn’t have to give into the government. Individuals have their own thoughts but can not be expressed because of government rules. Civil disobedience is the refusal with certain laws or paying taxes. Thoreau stood up for rights of U.S. citizens and equality. In July of 1846 Thoreau was sent to jail on his fight for independence. He refused to pay taxes against the Mexican War. Thoreau’s individual protest of the governments involvement for civil rights issues was not properly justified. The document indicated the actions of the government and slavery as a challenge. Thoreau took action by starting a nonviolence revolution. He states “Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once” (Thoreau, pg. 329). Thoreau explains the sole purpose is freedom. He continues the fight for injustice against the government and will remain due to the power they hold. Thoreau wants a better government system where a conscience role exists. The fight for equality was based on justice and strength. He continues by saying “That government is best which governs not at all” (Thoreau, pg. 322). Thoreau explains the government shouldn’t hold all the power to individual rights. He compares the government system and injustice as a political …show more content…
recognized the importance of individual rights like Henry Thoreau. King was a leader against segregation who helped made a difference on taming civil rights. He was a religious man who focused on groups of people to make a change, while Thoreau was assertive for his own thought against the government. King accepted going to jail knowing he was fighting for what he believed in for the nation. His “Letter from Birmingham Jail” explained civil rights continuing and American must help make that change. The letter transformed ideas directed towards civil disobedience. “This appeared to be a start in the right direction. Soon, however, it became clear that the enforcement and implementation of these goals hindered or prevented by white opposition” (Patton, pg. 56). King was a man who respected the law but wanted justice for rights. He upheld that violence was never the answer when trying to transform social changes. By writing the letter in Birmingham, Alabama King got more attention toward his actions in the community of injustice being pressured against the government. King states “Let is all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear-drenched communities” (King, pg. 172). Obeying the law in a civil right movement was how King wanted to handle protest. Racism played a role when trying to gain rights white Americans had. He didn’t need the government to be against him

Related Documents