John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism provides the reader with a meaning behind the value of utilitarianism as a moral theory. Mill defines the utilitarianism theory as one that state's “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (p. 90). Many utilitarians look at utility as pleasure, with the absence of pain. He presents utilitarianism as a view that utilitarians perceive to be the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. This is implied by the theory that the right action is accepted in terms of the consequences produced. Mill believes everything is derived from this desire for happiness, and it is the sole basis of morality. Derived from this …show more content…
Mill argues there is a way to separate higher and lower quality pleasures. He offers the principle of utility to claim some kinds of pleasures are more desirable and more valuable than others. He states that human pleasures are much more superior than animalistic ones, but once people are made aware of their higher pleasures in life it will be evident those people would want to cultivate those pleasures. He says it is considered a higher quality if people would choose it over another pleasure even if the higher pleasure included pain or could be traded for a higher quantity of a lower pleasure. In this utilitarian view, higher pleasures are usually more intellectual pleasures that might require a higher understanding or individual intellect. Lower pleasures may be viewed as more sensual pleasures that can be more easily obtained by man. He believes the highest good is what produces the most pleasure for a person. Mill goes on to dispute that people will always prefer the pleasure that ends with a higher quality over any quantity of lower …show more content…
He argues, people who enjoy higher pleasures over lower are often less content with their lives, but their pleasure is still of a higher quality than someone who enjoys lower quality pleasures. However, people who choose lower pleasures are often more content in life. He contends people that are less content compared to others amounts from the simple fact that they have a deeper, more coherent understanding of the world around them. Mill then goes on to claim that there are people who have experienced both the high and low pleasures in life. He suggests these people are more qualified to judge a pleasure’s overall quality rather than someone who has only experienced the low pleasures in life. Mill declares these people, who are more familiar with those higher pleasures, then undoubtedly have an increased value for high intellect, feelings, imagination, and moral sentiments that are included with the higher pleasures. Mill states, the remarkably lower pleasures only take into account the pure physicality of the pleasure taken part in, unlike higher pleasures. Therefore, higher pleasures are far more superior in quality and naturally more desirable to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    These two pleasures also differ in worth. According to Utilitarianism intellectual pleasures are worthy of being desired and pursued more than animal pleasures therefore they are of higher value than physical pleasures. Intellectual and physical pleasures are According to Mill, a pleasure is of higher quality if one that experienced both would prefer it over the other. Mill contends, it is an "unquestionable fact" that, given equal access to all kinds of pleasures, people will prefer those that appeal to their "higher" faculties (No Philosophy of Swine). Intellectual pleasures are of higher character than physical pleasures because physical pleasures are seen to be animalistic.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This choice will be linked with quality pleasure if the subject would not chose the other pleasure given the fact that more of that option may be given. Society tends to gravitate towards pleasures that acquire a higher aptitude. Those that seek this usually do not get the full bliss from what life has to offer only because being too informed about anything, and/or everything can decrease the spontaneous aspect of what the world has to offer. This is where we coin the phrase, “Ignorance is bliss.” I completely agree with the distinctions made by Mill between the quantity of pleasures and quality of pleasures. In addition I also agree that the quality of pleasures surpasses the quantity aspect.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human nature is the characteristics and feelings all shared by human beings. In human nature, utilitarianism views that actions are only morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much happiness as any other available act. It is composed of the value theory and the theory of right action. The value theory emphasizes that the only thing valuable in its own right is happiness and the absence of suffering. Whereas, The theory of right action maximizes value and produces the most expected value.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this excerpt, Glaucon contemplates the idea that injustice is potentially more powerful and more beneficial than justice. Philosophers such as Glaucon would argue that in order to maximize personal gain, it would be more reasonable for everyone to act…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bentham's Utilitarianism

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Mill, intellectual pleasures are of greater quality than physical pleasures, and that is another supporting reason as to why they are of higher value. A person who has experienced both types of pleasures always chooses intellectual pleasures over physical pleasures because it brings a stronger happiness. According to Utilitarianism, “whichever pleasure brings the most happiness is considered the greatest pleasure”. Intellectual pleasures bring a person a greater amount of happiness because intellectual pleasures are…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is what is right or wrong, as it relates to happiness. That is, it is right that promotes happiness, which is an increase of pleasure, and a reduction of pain. That which is wrong reduces, or deprives happiness, by its absence of pleasure and its presence of pain. Mill then went on to discuss difference qualities of pleasure, having higher and lower pleasure. He points out that some pleasures ae more desirable than others, and that most utilitarian writers prefer mental pleasures over bodily.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mills rated fun and non-educational things lower because he said lower pleasures don't bring you the same kind of happiness a higher pleasure does. You feel a lot happier when you gain a skill by practicing and putting in time to a pleasure rather then watching a movie or listening to music which will only make you happy for a short term. Meanwhile Bentham says as long as the pleasure makes you happy do it. Like Bentham, Mills also developed a theory called Rule Utilitarianism. Rule Utilitarianism the action is right as it conforms to a rule that often leads to the “greatest good”.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Higher scoring countries will have the beliefs that success is and individual task and an individual reward. They believe that “people are most productive when working alone.” (Hofstede, G. 2001) Lower scoring countries adopt a more collective style of thinking and believe that the success of the group is more important. Generally, these lower scoring countries will make more sacrifices and the needs of the group are more important than the…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays