Optional Protocol To The Convention Against Torture

Improved Essays
The Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture came into force in 2006, many nations have only recently ratified it and are still working on execution. The OPCAT is significant because it is a fundamental concept within the UN human rights system because it established a concrete structure of systematic and unannounced visits to detention centers. This has a huge emphasizes on prevention of inhumane treatment, instead of deferring to construct punishment after violations have already occurred.
When a state ratifies the OPCAT, its focal responsibility is to set up an independent National Preventive Mechanism (NPM). The OPCAT does not specifically structure or outline a model for NPMs, it is up to each State to decide what is greatest
…show more content…
In 1976 a journal published an article by Jean-Jacques Gautier named “A new weapon against torture.” The article summarizes a proposal for an international agreement to establish a system of unannounced visits to places of imprisonment. His idea was to prevent cruel and inhumane conduct by opening up the doors of all places of detention to outside monitoring, rather than react to matters after they had already happened. This later became known as the Gautier proposal, one of the most influential articles on the prevention of torture. There were many reactions to his idea, many supporting it and wanting to put the proposal into action. Of course, there was opposition too, some responded to the idea saying it was too optimistic. In 1977 Jean-Jacques Gautier founded the Swiss Committee against Torture, which advanced to become the APT, which was a stand to encourage the prevention of …show more content…
Four years later the UN General Assembly adopted the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture with one hundred twenty-seven states in favor, four states against, and forty-two abstentions.
The first regional instrument for the prohibition and prevention of torture was in 2002 when the African Commission adopted The Robben Island Guidelines. This document was comprised of concrete guidance for the African States, as well as providing reparations for any victims of torture or inhuman treatment.
The Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture gained fifteen states parties by December 2005 and has since seen considerable development in the last decade. By 2006, it had jumped to twenty ratifications and entered into force. This is when the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture elected its first ten members. By the end of 2006, there were National Preventive Mechanisms (NPM) designated in four countries and the OPCAT had thirty State Parties. By the next year, fourteen countries had developed preventive mechanisms. In 2016, the OPCAT had eighty-one States ratified and sixty-four National Preventive Mechanisms in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Term Torture

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term “Torture” derives from the Latin word “tortus” meaning “twisted. Torture involves the intentional infliction of physical or mental pain on a person to fulfill some desire of the perpetrator or to compel some action from the victim. The following are some general definitions of torture. 1. Torture is the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Attack referring to execution without judgment, torture, and assaults upon personal dignity. The first Geneva Convention also granted prisoners the right to proper medical treatment and care (“Geneva Conventions,” n.d.). The second Geneva Convention served as an extension of the first one by granting the same rights to shipwrecked soldiers and other naval forces. These first Geneva Convention occurred in 1864, and the original purpose was to ensure the welfare of wounded soldiers (Beehner, 2006). Then after WWII, the Geneva Conventions occurred once more to add some further rights to prisoners of war so that conditions such as those encountered in WWII would never again…

    • 1027 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why? why does Australia do this? As a nation we are meant to be free, but then as soon as people arrive here to be in a safe environment they are thrown into detention centres onto remotes islands such as Manus. If these people are running from dangerous and unhealthy situations, then why are they being put into similar situations in another country. The three topics that are being covered include: how Australia doesn’t protect the human rights, what the rights towards refugees and asylum seekers are and how the rights towards refugees and asylum seekers are violated and finally what is currently being done to stop Australia from violating these rights?…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When hearing about torture, whether on the news or in an article, we as Americans do not consider the lasting effects it has on people. Physical and psychological torture is mainly employed as war tactics, to get information out of people. Torture is not a concept that is talked about on a day to day basis, because of the many freedoms we experience as Americans. In the article The Case for Torture, Michael Levin portrays torture as something that should be permissible.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The thesis of this essay is clear and ridiculous. The argument that public torture is a more suitable substitute to prison time is so inhumane and primitive; it makes me wonder whether or not the author is being sincere in his essay. He supports his arguments by listing victims of these severe punishments and the ordeals that they endured.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Parry 2010). There are other cases, when people, who are so much committed to their religious ideology for example, would prefer to die because of pain or injures and would not agree to talk. In such cases tortures could also be hardly considered to be effective, as they practically lead to a murder of an individual and nothing more. Often tortures are seen as rather effective as preventive means, when they are applied towards dissidents or guerrillas with the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust was a time when people such as Jews, Roma, Slavs, homosexuals, and people with disabilities were targeted for genocide by Nazi Germany. The Germans treated these people like they were animals. During this time, there were a lot of cruel and inhuman things that the Germans did to the specific groups of people targeted. The Germans accused them for for many things such as their failing economy. Articles Five, Twelve, and Eighteen of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are just three of the arcticles violated during the Holocaust.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Bedard, Nelson, Spaziano, 2013) While other laws have been put in place to deal with human rights abuses, there are still many that argue the ATS is relevant, and should still be considered in certain…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punishment In The 1800s

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The punishments for crimes have changed a lot since the 1800s, this paper will show how and why they have changed. Some people call the types of punishments they were given torture, “most americans have expressed shock and disbelief that american citizens could inflict such terrible tortures on other human beings”.(Einloft 2) .Some of these instances are used to ” Foreign critics of the United States have claimed that the acts of torture demonstrate the United States' racism, imperialism, and hypocrisy, and some have used the incidents to devalue Western conceptions of human rights in general”.(Einloft 2) One of the main reasons they say torture or hanging was used is because crime rates were rising and there was not enough space in prisons…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How do you determine if and when the use of torture would be ethical? Let’s begin by examining the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances on the moral and ethical use of torture. John Stuart Mills’ theory on the ethical of the use of torture is that it is acceptable if it brings happiness and/or pleasure to the majority of people than if the torture were not carried out. One example he gives to support that theory is, if a terrorist has information that will prevent an act of terror that would result in the death of hundreds of innocent people and by obtaining this information thru an act of torture, it would likely save those lives he would agree…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, however, different forms of inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment as well as torture are practised in all parts of the world, including highly industrialised and developed countries. Despite the fact that society is evolving, the effect of torture remains the same: such violations of human rights result in serious harm to the human being, to his physical and mental immunity, and requires a lot of effort to make it stop. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” . For many years international legal institutions have been developing, improving and consolidating different ways of resolving the problem. At…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Desperate Times Would you ever hurt someone? What if hurting that someone meant that you would be seen as a hero amongst many? What if hurting someone meant that you were able to save innocent lives? What if hurting someone meant that you lost a piece of yourself and what it means to be human? `The topic at hand is if it is ever justifiable to torture someone under any circumstance.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction On July 17, 1998 South Africa signed and proceeded to ratify, the Rome Statute of the International Court (Plessis, 2007). South Africa was one of the earliest supporters for setting up the court that would be known to try extreme cases of human rights violations. The International Criminal Court (ICC) was in fact created to take care of any atrocities and punishing them within the international borders, ones that cannot be dealt with within their own territories. The ICC stands as a last resort to any criminal events still standing, within the realm of where its jurisdiction lies (Plessis, 2007).…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays