Hobbes discusses states of nature in theory, whereas Locke demonstrates examples of where they actually exist. Hobbes’ Locke’s state of nature both consists of the dangers of a state of nature. Both of these philosophers refer to men as being equal in this state. Hobbes states that “nature hath made men so equal in the faculties of mind and body…. the difference between man and man is not so considerable” (Wootton, 158). Locke defines nature as a “state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another” (Wootton, 288). Hobbes believes that the entire time that man is in a state of nature, he is in a state of war. He states that “if any two men cannot enjoy the same thing, they become enemies and in the way to their end…. endeavor to destroy or subdue one another” (Wootton, 158). Locke fears that within the “law of nature,” society may implement decisions, therefore resulting to a state of war. Although these two men have similarities, Locke and Hobbes’ state of nature also differ from one
Hobbes discusses states of nature in theory, whereas Locke demonstrates examples of where they actually exist. Hobbes’ Locke’s state of nature both consists of the dangers of a state of nature. Both of these philosophers refer to men as being equal in this state. Hobbes states that “nature hath made men so equal in the faculties of mind and body…. the difference between man and man is not so considerable” (Wootton, 158). Locke defines nature as a “state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another” (Wootton, 288). Hobbes believes that the entire time that man is in a state of nature, he is in a state of war. He states that “if any two men cannot enjoy the same thing, they become enemies and in the way to their end…. endeavor to destroy or subdue one another” (Wootton, 158). Locke fears that within the “law of nature,” society may implement decisions, therefore resulting to a state of war. Although these two men have similarities, Locke and Hobbes’ state of nature also differ from one