Similarities Between Great Britain And France

Superior Essays
What was more damaging to the interests of Great Britain and France, the remilitarization of the Rhineland or the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War?

When looking upon the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War and the Remilitarisation of the Rhineland through the perspective of a 1940’s British or French politician, you can see clearly how the former was to be prioritised. This was a war that had gripped a whole nation and the rapid military intervention by Germany and Italy soon meant that a seemingly civil matter, had in fact developed into full scale warfare. This ensured that the impact of the Civil War on Britain and France could not be disregarded. The matter had become a high priority within the British government, with it debated continuously
…show more content…
They believed the Remilitarisation of the Rhineland would actually have little damaging effect upon British interests as long as Germany would realign its aggressive policies. In the short term the remilitarisation would cause little harm to Britain and the view was shared by the British public who simply saw the rearmament of the Rhineland as a Country simply claiming reclaiming territory of its own. This opinion in Britain had its origins from the 1920’s, because while Britain had quite significantly reduced its armed forces, France and other Eastern European Countries had refused to follow suit. Therefore their was a deeply entrenched feeling of sympathy for Germany, as while it had been made to disarm it was surrounded by Countries that had not done so. However it is clear that Britain underrated Hitler’s larger intentions and the Remilitarisation of the Rhineland actually caused Hitler to gain a great strategic location that would benefit him largely during the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Brinkley (2011) there were several major areas of disagreement between the American Colonists and the British. Great Britain had taken on huge amounts of debt from the 7 years’ war. There were several different thoughts on how to recuperate this money but in the end King George III relied on his newly appointed prime minister George Grenville to devise a…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The colonists believed in actual representation, meaning that the colonists believed the representatives that they elected to represent them directly. Actual representation made sense to the colonists because it was more of a reality in America. Although both the colonists and the British believed in the concept of no taxation without representation, they still weren't able to agree on the meaning of representation. On their views of taxation, the British believed that they had the right to levy all the taxes necessary for the colonies.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the year of 1763, the British Empire was similar to the French empire when administering its colony. For the French empire, a few of the colonist had begun to settled in 1605, where they marked territories in Canada and in Louisiana. Also, they had allianced with the Native Americans, as well as keeping a fur trade, religious restrictions, and limited immigration in order to maintain balance of power in North America. In the British empire, it allowed for Americans to elect legislative assemblies. However, only males with an amount of property could vote, and it was during the eighteenth century when property was starting widespread across America.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Spanish Civil War Analysis

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Spanish Civil War in 1936-1939 is a historically complex event interwoven in both internal and foreign agendas. This was manifest in the involvement of various factions from militia, unions, and parties of different standings and ambitions. Not less important was the overt interest of other countries in the Spanish national affairs, such as the direct intervention of Germany and Italy or the non-intervention stance of Britain and France; an aspect which would ultimately decide the outcome of the civil war itself. The war is predominantly recorded as a fight between the Right-winged Nationalists and the Left-winged Republicans, the Conservatives versus the Liberals, and to many, Spanish Civil War had been seen ultimately as a warfare waged…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Treaty of Versaille was a harsh blow to Germany, not only to it’s ego but also its economy. The terms for Germany were not something they could easily comply to. The Versailles treaty included payments of 367 billion dollars in U.S. currency. However Germany could not pay these fees because the economy was doing so poorly.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War II: A Different Look Imagine a world in which America had actually lost World War II. Consider the impact the Nazi’s would have had on the world if they were to win. It can be hard to determine as there can be multiple scenarios to how this would play out. Along with this, there is no true way to determine what would have happened. The book, “The Man in The High Castle” takes a look at what the world would be like if the Axis powers had won World War II.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondary Sources

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A secondary source, this book is written by Anthony Beevor, A British military Historian, It is originally published in 2006. Its purpose was to revise previous interpretations and recount the events that happened in the Spanish civil war. The focus of the book is on 2 Chapters, one being chapter 17: The battle of Madrid and Chapter and Chapter 33: The fall of Catalonia, both chapters depicts to different key battles that uses the Guerra Celere(rapid war)that results to the loss of territory for the republicans and describe how the strategy of rapid and major offensive were used. The author uses a number of sources to produce an accurate historical account of the events happening during the Spanish civil war, therefore it can be said that the source chance of being biased is little. The source is…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the late 1700s and early 1800s, revolutionary spirit was everywhere. The world was shocked at the success of the American Revolution, in which the oppressed colonies gained independence from Britain. This success, along with several other causes, motivated the oppressed lower class of France to have their own revolution. Shortly after the French Revolution, Haiti, a French colony, was inspired by the same ideals and had one of their own. The French Revolution and the Haitian Revolution are very similar in the ideals that drove them, the way they were carried out, and the things they achieved both through the revolutions themselves and their legacies today.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between the years 1750 - 1914, the American Revolution, French Revolution, and Haitian Revolution were all similar due to what sparked the revolutions and the social groups during, yet differed in the outcome of the revolutions. Between the years 1750 and 1914 the American Revolution the French Revolution and Haitian Revolution were all similar due to what sparked the revolution. The beginning of the start of these revolutions were mainly due to the over taxation of put in place by political leaders for example Parliament in the case of the British American colonists and King Louis XVI and the nobles in the French Revolution and Haitian Revolution. Over taxation came from the 7 years war in which the British and French fought.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After many centuries of lengthy battles and reciprocal acts of treachery Britain and France have reached an historic agreement to go to war together in future, at the same time, in the same place and, if necessary, on the same side. No more sinking each other's ships or shooting each other's men in the…

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foreign intervention played a major role in the Spanish Civil War. One of the main reasons why the Nationalists were victorious was because the foreign powers provided the them with weapons, soldiers, military advisers and economic support. On another note, the establishment of the Non-Intervention Committee, which was signed by Britain, France and the United States, banned international support for the Republicans. Therefore, the Nationalists gained an advantage over the Republics, due to the support of Germany and Italy. The unbalance of foreign intervention was caused by the fact that both Germany and Italy provided great amount of support by sending the Nationalists men, tanks and aircrafts.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the aggression of the dictators in Europe the Democratic European leaders wanted to find a solution to the growing problem. Hitler and Mussolini violated the Treaty of Versailles and built up their armies to invade other countries. Italy invaded Ethiopia to start another Italian empire. Germany built up its army, created a new air force, the Luftwaffe, and sent troops into the Rhineland. Japan left the League of Nations and invaded Manchuria.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sidney Bradshaw Fay and Fritz Fischer both wrote about the origin of World War One in a time of German historiography controversy. Both of these men took the same event and analyzed it to come to different conclusions. Both men, though very similar in their amount of research and thought process, looked through different lenses at the same problem. Fritz Fischer was a native German, but he believed World War One was completely caused by Imperial Germany.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is well known that Adolf Hitler is a master of persuasion and in his Reichstag speech of December 11, 1941, he shows why. In this speech he gives reasons for the outbreak of war in September 1939, explains why he decided to attack the Soviet Union in June 1941, and announces that Germany was now in a war against the United States. Throughout this speech, he was able to maintain an air of righteousness while successfully manipulating his people into fighting for him. To accomplish this task, he cunningly uses a persuasive format for organizing his points, tone, and rhetoric devices, such as pathos, false dilemmas, and ethos, to gain support and loyalty of the German nation and maintain it.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The pursuit of national interest is always in the formula for the calculations of the rational decisions made by a nation. National interest is something each nation is thinking about when they go into war. World War I was the sacrifice of millions of lives to fulfill each nation’s national interest. William Kirby argues that, countries enter war because of their “rational calculations and national interests”. The source points out how the purpose of war is not irrational, it is rationalized by the beliefs of a nation and the benefits of military conflict.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays