The Quest For Justice In The First 48

Improved Essays
(INSERT TOPIC SENTENCE). In the Criminal Justice System, Miranda rights are one of the most important elements when making an arrest. When a law enforcement officer makes an arrest and decides to question the suspect, they must read the Miranda rights out loud. If the individual starts talking and incriminating itself before the police officers informs them about the Miranda rights, the information provided from the suspect will be inadmissible in court. According to Cole, Smith, and DeJong (2016), the Miranda rights are as follows:
Suspect must be told that (1) they have the right to remain silent; (2) if they decide to make a statement, it can and will be used against them in court; (3) they have the right to an attorney present during
…show more content…
One english concept from the episode of The First 48 was the use of “pathos”, which is the art of persuasion by use of emotion. The specific pathos that was used in this episode is intended to make the viewer feel sorrow and sympathy. The producer of this episode chose to emphasize the sadness of the loss of the lives of Yayehyirad Lemma and Yenenesh Desta to engage the viewer and force the viewer to mourn the loss of the lives along with the family and friends. The episode showed the victim 's friends, family and neighbors crying, and even mentions for a lengthy amount of time the murdered couple’s baby who no longer has parents. (INSERT PARAPHRASE WITH CITATION). This display was intentional, and was meant to compel the viewer to mourn the death of this couple with the loved ones. In english, pathos can be a major part of persuasive writing. Pathos can be used in many diFferent situations to make the viewer or reader feel many different things. The use of pathos can completely alter the way a consumer views a product. This often times can be scene in persuasive writing papers, when the writer causes the reader to feel a strong emotion in order to get his/her point across. The use of pathos can make …show more content…
Just as criminal justice and english concepts frequently relate to “real world” scenarios, criminal justice and english relate to each other in many ways as well. One significant way they relate to each other is with the idea of claims and evidence. In english, if someone makes a claim such as, “the girl is pretty”, the author must then backup that claim with evidence, possibly by describing exactly what makes the girl “pretty”. In criminal justice however, a claim may be “Michael killed Sally”. Just like in english, this claim will then need to have sufficient evidence to prove it to be true. This evidence could be physical/forensic (hair, fingerprints etc.), direct (testimony) or circumstantial, but is required to prove someone guilty of committing a crime. The episode of The First 48 uses claims and evidence as well. One claim that the episode makes is that Jeffrey Antal and Robert Franks do not get along. A neighbor and friend of Jeffrey used a simile in the way he described the relationship between Jeffrey and Robert, saying that they were “like two sticks of dynamite” (INSERT TIMESTAMP AND CITATION). The use of this simile to describe the relationship between these men gives the viewer a better grasp on how violent these men may be. The evidence to undeniably prove that these two men did not get along comes from the fact that Robert killed Jeff

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the courts tend to attach significant importance to a suspect’s confession regardless if its true or not (Kassin, et al., 2010). Therefore, interrogators should ensure that innocent people are not coerced into providing a false confession. Every individual charged with an offense is required due process through the courts (Gudjonsson & Pearse, 2011). However, the Reid technique exploits suspects vulnerability through manipulative and confrontational tactics (Gudjonsson & Pearse, 2011). This technique is guilt presumptive and is used to break down the suspects resistance and denial…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sex Rape Case Study

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Analyze the importance of the evidentiary examination of the victims of a sex crime. Address what goes into preserving this type of evidence for court. An evidentiary examination must be performed in the event a sexual assault has taken place. Although reliable the examination is not without its draw backs and needs to be conducted by qualified personnel and the evidence has to be handled properly to lessen or avoid courtroom challenges. The victim’s body is the primary crime scene in sexual assault cases.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Interrogation Case Study

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is then up to the interrogator to read the body language of the suspect and sift through for the truth (Dixon, 2010). The Reid technique is widely used, some researchers believe that all interrogation tactics can be broken up into two categories, minimization and maximization. Minimization refers to when the interrogator displays sympathy and provides the suspect with moral justification for the crime committed, in a gently and subtle for of persuasion (Chapman, 2013; Narchet, Meissner, & Russano, 2011). Maximization, on the other hand, is more aggressive as the interrogator displays a solid belief in the suspect’s guilt and tries to assert that any attempt to deny guilt will fail (Chapman, 2013). Research has shown that use of minimization and maximization, as well as other manipulative techniques, can increase the chance of a false confession being obtained (Narchet et al.,…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court decision declaring that suspects in custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and be represented during questioning” (Cole, Smith, DeJong, 2014). That quote is the definition of Miranda v. Arizona from an introduction to criminal justice book. It is important to note that this is how the Miranda v. Arizona case is being taught to future criminal justice employees. The book also mentions that some police officers are trained to interrogate suspects to talk despite reading them their Miranda rights, which morally isn’t right. Officers are gaining information the improper way especially since society don’t fully understand their rights.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This information gave officers’ probable cause for an arrest. In this case the two suspects were arrested in the commission of a felony. Suspect number one was charged with breaking and entering an occupied residence. Suspect number two was charged with breaking and entering, and grand theft auto. Although an arrest takes away a person’s fundamental right to freedom, police must still follow proper protocol to carry out a legal arrest.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He suggests, “motions for retrial based on false testimony presented by prosecution witnesses should be governed by a standard drawn from newly discovered evidence and prosecutorial misconduct” (p. 52). He also explains how a proper test for courtroom misconduct is more likely achievable if there is a great chance that the jury is aware of the false testimony and would avoid convicting the defendant. By acknowledging the challenges that the system faces in dealing with courtroom misconduct, the author indicates that there is a need to hold professional members of the court with a greater amount of accountability. Although there is the potential consequence for retrial, some attorneys…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Repeating that traumatic event onto another being is a choice made. In any criminal case, one must have the means, motive, and the opportunity when someone arrests another individual they do not claim that they murdered that person due to being related by a criminal that would be pathetic. People do not commit any crimes unless they are willing to do so on their terms, not from genetics. Many studies have discussed the whole ideology of rape even however, “the researchers who led the work, to a certain degree—warn that the study has some serious limitations.” (Emily Underwood). Also, “Most studies point to early life experiences, such as childhood abuse, as the most important risk factor for becoming a perpetrator of abuse in adulthood.” (Emily Underwood).…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lineups are part of an identification process and based on an eyewitness identification, which could be a problem a criminal can be either guilty or innocent which his/her freedom could be placed in jeopardy (Walker, 2013). Being a one of a kind element, eyewitness identification proof can lead to unreliability factors, which is different from any other types of proof. Yet eyewitness identification places a powerful effect on the jury and judicial system (Walker, 2013). Relevant Court Case…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police question suspects and witnesses for two reasons, to gather information about the crime and to try to get a suspect to confess if they believe the individual is guilty. This is where Miranda rights are important. The Constitution guarantees certain rights including the following. The right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney, either one that is appointed by the state or one that is privately hired. To start with the first line of the Miranda statement “You have the right to remain silent”.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crime Control Model

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The due process model is able to maintain the reliable fact-finding techniques, it also can incorporate prophylactic and deterrent mechanisms. However, the release of the factually guilty and even blotting of the illegality might be existent in cases, thus it would still have evidence in identifying the adjudicative accused person’s guilty by fact-finders. Consequently, it is necessary to produce adequate pressure by penalizing errant police and prosecutors within criminal processes, the finding of facts is not only the factor to convict a person’s guilty, but also necessarily by appropriate legal…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays