Fast Fashion Industry Analysis

Improved Essays
“Fast fashion isn’t free. Someone, somewhere is paying” a famous quote by Lucy Siegle. Fashion has been a major theme of this century, and has become a way of individual’s expressing themselves and has turned into a recreational activity, but no one actually thinks about what cost society pays for this. Many clothing items bought in the United States today, happen to be manufactured in other countries. The price of clothing has many effects on the world, and might be cheaper in the US because people die in other countries to make it. Mankind could fix these issues by raising awareness of the well-being of workers in other countries, not just theirs. Throughout time, the popularity of shopping has risen, but the economic and worldwide effects …show more content…
The industry majorly affects the country, but the country also has various effects on other countries. An example of how the fashion industry affects the United States happens to be that it brings in $19 billion a year. The garment industry has almost doubled in size since 2011, and is worth about $20 billion a year. In 2011, the industry got its highest export of $4 billion. (Counting) The US also majorly affects other countries through the fashion industry, in mostly negative ways. Other countries have much lower working conditions because of the low cost on clothes made for the US. A company called True Religion, who produces its jeans in California claims that they could sell $300 jeans for $40 if they were made in China. (Real Cost 3) Many major companies are trying to avoid paying taxes, causing garment workers to be paid less. (Counting) Society is working on fixing this issue, but do not yet have a definite solution. Workers may abandon the clothes made in Bangladesh because there happen to be safety issues in the factories similar to sweatshop conditions. An interview suggestion: set a basis on minimum wage that has to be followed so there is no debate about what is right. (Counting) Thanks to the United States, factory conditions have improved over the past 10 years. They are starting to insure regular checks around factories, and continue to work on improving garment workers’ working …show more content…
These workers, in return, receive bad working conditions. In the 1970’s clothing companies started moving their factories to China, India, Bangladesh, Mexico, and other nations where labor is less expensive. (Real Cost 1) Negative impacts occur at every stage from those who grow the cotton to the garment workers. For making a $100 pair of jeans, the factory workers only receive 50 cents. (Environmental 16) Clothing workers in China make $1.26 an hour and in Cambodia, workers make just 52 cents. (Real Cost 3) Safety inspections are rare in these factories because they take both time and money. (Real Cost 2) Although, enforcement of regulations is usually the government’s responsibility. The companies that sell the clothes in the US profit the most from the cheap labor. On average, Americans purchase about 68 pieces of clothing per year. (Real Cost 3) Ben Ramsden, who is a founder of Pants to Poverty and Pi Foundation wants to fix these issues in other countries and said “it is our hope to launch this process and support its emergence as a new standard for corporate reporting. (Environmental 17)
In conclusion, the price of clothing has many effects on the world, and might be cheaper in the US because people die in other countries to make it. The US benefits in various ways from the fashion industry, but takes a toll on both, other countries, and causes environmental

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One piece of the information that surprised me was that Apple could earn eighty dollars while the Taiwan company in mainland China could only earn four dollars when the 299 dollars iPod is sold. It is surprising how little money that the Taiwan company can earn even though almost all the hard work are done by the factory. Since the company can only earn a small percentage of the total income, it is less likely for workers to have a higher wage. 5. The film does change my opinion about the US/China relationship in some extent.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Effects Of Outsourcing

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before Nike, jobs were “10 to 14 hours a day in the burning sun or the intensive rain” (189). Those horrible conditions compared to an air conditioned factory with regular work hours are a major improvements for the county. The Nike Vietnamese workers also get paid 54 dollars a month, which is so high “that they are almost luring doctors and teachers away from their important jobs” (189). The Vietnamese people look to be making little money, but compared to farming, they are making extraordinary sums of money. Even people who get paid higher in Vietnamese society consider working in factories.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Fashion Industry

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Businesses can take advantage of things like this because it relieves them of responsibility of giving benefits and they save money because they don’t have to pay the higher minimum wages in the United States. Yes there are so many positive aspects to outsourcing specifically in the fashion industry. Manufactures and designers can send employment to other people in these poorer countries. Also manufacturers can mass produce more of a product to increase sales. But the pros of outsourcing the industry is outweighed by…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sadly in each of these incidents innocent factory workers lives were lost because of poor labor laws. In the Bangladesh incident there were 1,100 deaths and 2,500+ injuries, as stated in the article The High Price of Cheap Fashion. The workers in the Bangladesh factories are unsafe, they work long hours and only get paid about $2 a day. The effect of the workers being paid so little is that clothing is cheaper to make in foreign countries. In 1990 50% of clothes sold in the U.S. were made in the U.S., currently only 2% of clothing is made here.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The growing affordability and availability of fashion is shortening the life of clothing. According to journalist Elizabeth L. Cline, the average American buys 64 items of clothing per year but spends only 3% of his or her income on clothing—the lowest percentage to date.3 Since the low-cost of garments impacts a consumer’s income minimally, it persuades the consumer to believe that clothing is invaluable and not durable. Clothing then becomes something that is purchased causally and disposed of…

    • 1872 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, what is the opportunity cost that comes with Nike choosing the work labor in another country versus work labor in America. First the laws and wages of society range widely different in various countries, other countries like China, Philippines, and Indonesia are willing to do the work for a cheaper cost because of the cost of living in another country or simply because they require the money at any cost due to their poor economy. Secondly big companies like Nike avoid paying higher prices in the product, so they can buy the material to make the merchandise for cheaper in another country and charge you what you think are good low prices but for them is a good profit. The other side the opportunity cost is that Nike will state it creates jobs for thousands of people in poor economies, it creates a relationship with struggling economies and brings business flow to that country or that it even gives the country recognition due to the big label name it carries throughout the world. The choice is obvious for Nike but are they doing this trade ethical once again?…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My point is that if the Nike pays the Vietnamese workers the same amount in America, they may turn out to be millionaires in Vietnam. Norberg once said “If I was an anti-globalist, I would stop complaining about Nike’s bad wage. If there is a problem, it is that is wages are too high, so that they are almost luring doctors and teacher away from their important jobs.” In other words, why should I be a doctor, a teacher and etc. if I can just work for Nike and get paid more? This is why I think is reasonable to pay in Vietnamese currency, which translate to only fifty four U.S dollars a…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many negative long term effects of providing the lowest prices at Wal-Mart through their corporate methodology. President Obama stated that, “The battle to engage Wal-Mart and force them to examine their corporate values and policies is absolutely vital to America today” (Lichtenstein, 304). Wal-Mart’s history of paying its employees low wages and importing cheap products from China has given them a large advantage over other retail and grocery merchants in America. Wal-Mart consistently forces other companies out of business and causes job loss across the country (Rowell). In the decade following Wal-Mart’s move into Iowa 7,326 businesses were lost (Rowell).…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If they try to unionise and strike for better human treatment and higher wages, the management as well as the government deals with them strictly. This could even result in the workers losing their jobs. Nike has endured many criticism and these criticisms are not only limited to foreign companies. Nike’s advert have motivated the athletic youths in the United States to invest in the brand. Talking about underprivileged youth that sees sports as the pathway out of poverty, Nike sells these youth sneakers for about $150 while it pays the Vietnam worker $1.60 a day.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He argued against mercantilism, which is a belief in the benefits of profitable trading. Mercantilism theory tells us that people should try to buy very few things so that they spend less money, but sell as much products as they can to get more money from the other countries. Adam Smith thinks that the specialization of labor in different industries and countries can make more money by producing certain things. For example, China can make more money if they sell clothes because people will buy it from them since it’s cheaper there. Similarly, the United States can also make money if they produce technologies because the United States specializes in that production.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics