The Pros And Cons Of Durkheim

History has been proven that there have been a lot of means that has brought human beings together and some of this means are religion, politics, education etc. Nature has been the main thing that controls human existence on the planet and every development and increase in human life has come into existence as a result of production. Men have been able to distinguish themselves from animal producing their means of subsistence which is within their existence and through this process which we term mode of production has led to an increase in a population where there is the need for one to control the means of production which has brought a lot of bureaucracy in this world. As a result of this came from those who own the wealth who are called …show more content…
The togetherness of the people in such a situation is what Durkheim has termed its collective consciousness. He made a profound statement that has been a challenge to the entire world, “Durkheim said there a whole host of the act which has been and still is regarded as a crime without in themselves being harmful to the society” (pg.32). There are a lot of things that people do and do not consider them as crimes but can end you up in jail or go to the panel of law. He established a lot of examples which constituted a danger to society in a file share Durkheim was trying to prove to the society is that one of the routines that can unite people together is when something happens that has to deal with the judiciary of the state and at the same time goes against the society. All he was trying to establish is since we live under a constitution of the state which composed of human beings there is the need to abide by the rule of law. Solidarity