The Prince Analytical Essay

Improved Essays
The Prince does not have characters that you would typically see in a novel. Instead, Machiavelli uses real people from current and past political situations as examples. As strange as it is, Machiavelli, the author, is actually a character, specifically the protagonist and the narrator, in “The Prince”. Machiavelli was a Italian diplomat. He was fired and thus, wrote The Prince during his exile (Shmoop). Machiavelli almost makes himself out as a magnificent human-being for constructing this plan on how to appropriately take-over a country and properly rule it. Readers of the novel often classify Machiavelli as an immoral, diabolical man, which is indeed apparent in this novel, but it should be taken into consideration that Machiavelli had just been fired from his dream job, jailed, tortured, and exiled. …show more content…
While the Medici family’s return was the reason of the firing of Machiavelli, he also dedicated The Prince to Lorenzo "Il Magnifico" de' Medici, and he also deemed them as the “saviors” of Florence. In the twenty-sixth chapter, the last chapter, Machiavelli pleads Lorenzo de' Medici to take reign of Italy. While Machiavelli was quite angry that the Medici family had fired and exiled him, he thought that they were the only hope for Florence’s future (Cliff Notes). The Prince is a novel that is full of examples of actual events that had taken place and therefore, there are numerous secondary characters throughout the book. Cesare Borgia is the single-most important secondary character. Machiavelli mentions Borgia multiple times throughout the novel. It is quite apparent that Machiavelli greatly admires Borgia. Borgia is Machiavelli’s main example of a prince who has great prowess in leading a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli is smart and a strategic author. There are many ways on how to interpret his famous work, “The Prince”. It is intriguing that Machiavelli did not provide a title for the book. In doing so, Machiavelli shows his strategic writing to challenge the reader. To read the book and accept it in a literal sense is questionable.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He analyzes how a great prince should be in political vision, but…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli Bad

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout history there have been many different types of leaders. Some are considered bad while others are considered good. All of these assumptions are based on how the people under and around the ruler perceives him. If they feel that he has unwanted qualities and has bad judgement then he is considered bad whilst if he is humble and always putting the people first then he is perceived as good. Machiavelli is a man whom went through many hardships in his life.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Prince was written by Niccolo Machiavelli in the early 16th century in order to once again get into favor of the ruling family of Florence: The Medici’s. Publically, the goal of The Prince was to inform a ruler (Lorenzo de’ Medici) how to maintain power and stay in good favor of the subjects they rule over. Because of the many contradictions between The Prince and The Discourses, countless scholars have been perplexed by what Machiavelli’s true intentions were. Although it seems like Machiavelli is writing a set of instructions for Lorenzo de’ Medici to become a good prince, I believe that he is trying to sabotage Leonardo in order to reinstitute a republic. Throughout his letter to Lorenzo, Machiavelli proposes many ideas that on the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While in office, Machiavelli saw how Cesaré Borgia ferociously came to power and he admired him for it. He loved how ruthless and successful Cesaré was in maintaining his newly established principality Although this prince would not be able to hold onto power, once his father died. His brilliance in coming to power is what Machiavelli focuses on in his manuscript. He often demonstrates the need to be cruel, but at the same time to do it fast, so that the people’s hatred will be brief. Cesaré was brutal all at once and did not allow his enemies to plot or conspire around him.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aside from the historical evidence pointed out already in the book which give us instant examples of how his rules are true, understanding motives, successes, and failures of kings and leaders and even outcomes of war is possible through a “machiavellian”…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicola Machiavelli’s book “The Prince” consists of theories and experiential advice on what are the true makings of an ideal prince and an effective government based on the life of Cesare Borgia. According to Machiavelli a good ruler should be ruthless and at times unethical in order to maintain power. In addition he stated that preparations for war should be the foremost occupation of a successful leader. Most importantly a successful prince should exhibit virtue. The first most emphasized characteristic in Machiavelli’s theory of an ideal prince is power.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Applying Niccolò Machiavelli’s Principles in The Prince to Tiffany & Co. Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat and philosopher, wrote The Prince during the period when the Medici family returned to power during the 16th century. In this book, Machiavelli describes and explains different points of advice for a prince to become a successful and reputable ruler. The Prince can be considered as a handbook for princes, and even after Machiavelli’s death in 1527, these ideas of guidance still holds true until today. The ideas presented in the book can also be applied in the modern business world for companies to follow.…

    • 2199 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another reason I think that this work should be taught is not only its political guidance but also the reactions it produces from its readers. While many see Machiavelli’s work as cynical and heartless others see his reasoning as realistic and factual. This reading offers a great opportunity for discussion amongst students as they discuss their…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays