Analysis Of Lao Tzu And Machiavelli's The Quality Of Prince

Good Essays
In Lao Tzu’s ‘‘Thought from the Tao-te Ching’’and Machiavelli’s ‘‘The Quality of prince’’, they both develop how an outstanding ruler should be by striking a balance between the people and the ruler. Lao Tzu believes since human nature is a part of the holistic universe, all human beings should follow the Way in order to be original people. If the ruler is enlightened by the
Way and Tao, he will not try to compete with others because the ruler realizes everything is ought to be moderate and appropriate for his people. Thus, Lao Tzu thinks that the ruler should be tolerant and flexible. However, Machiavelli insists that human nature is selfish and superficial. He analyzes how a great prince should be in political vision, but
…show more content…
These limitations will gradually weaken self- confidence of people. People will forget how to overcome their own destiny. What Machiavelli keeps stressing on is ambition .He apparently expresses the prince can take advantage of his reputation and morality to enrich his nation. In conclusion, Lao Tzu and Machiavelli both expound the ideal type of ruler and government from their viewpoint of human nature and morality. Lao Tzu thinks the Way is the origin of everything. Even the ruler has to follow the Way so that he will not try to control his people. Nevertheless, Machiavelli believes a successful sovereign should be powerful. No matter what kind of government they suggest to be, balance keeps a vital key to the ruler. Since the ancient and peaceful society no longer exist, Machiavelli‘s suggestion is more effective. The politicians should always modify the laws to govern the people properly. It is attempt to control the people to obey their rules. Although Lao Tzu’s theory is more beautiful and harmony, it is too ideal to practice. On contrary, Machiavelli gives people more practical and reasonable suggestion because people are now in a much more complex

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hereditary successors were born just like any other baby in the world. Just because their dad was good king does not mean that they will have the same passion for their people as their dad. That is why the people should elect who they want to represent them. Paine described the government as having the power to protect people against their own evil, life, liberty, and property. He believed that society has the right to govern and protect themselves until too much harm was caused and only then should the government be allowed to intervene.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One one hand, Hobbes discussed the necessity for a structure of government where an ultimate power would counteract the intrinsic selfishness of humans. Whereas, Montesquieu championed the idea of civic virtue arising from a society dedicated to liberty. Regardless of the specific nature of corruption, political corruption is a tiered concept because it does not end at the individual. Therefore, it is critical that the compounding effect of corruption should be curbed as as soon as possible. Wallis observed that “once independent, Americans worried continuously about their governments and how to design their political institutions to limit corruption” (Wallis 24).…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Individuals, Han Fei argues, should be given government positions only on their merits. By electing only deserving officials, the ruler ensures his power is properly preserved, as they will only act in the interest of the state. “When a man of true worth becomes a minister, he faces north before the sovereign, presents tokens of his allegiance, and banished from his mind the thought of all other loyalties.” (Han Feizi, 24) The deserving official understands his position in society and obeys all. Furthermore, Han Fei argues that rulers must use laws to uphold his ministers. Laws are the means of prohibiting error and ruling out selfish motives.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Confucius taught on an ideal ruler for the process of government. This ruler would be superior in their integrity and morality, and would be an example to others, in order to cultivate their own morality. A good ruler would seek to correct his subjects with love and concern rather than punishment and coercion. Furthermore, he explained that traditions were more important in molding the ideals of the people, rather than laws. He even put forth, “If the people be led by laws, and uniformity among them be sought by punishments, they will try to escape punishment and have no sense of shame.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He states that a prince must create a divided self. He says that the only way to create a long lasting fatherland is to be taught evil qualities and display them when beneficial for the state. For example, Machiavelli states that it is well documented that liberality is a good thing, but at times it is far better to seem liberal, but actually be miserly. “A Prince […] ought to care little though he incur the reproach of miserliness, for this is one of those vices which enable him to reign” (Machiavelli, 42). Even though being a penny pincher is not favorable, it enables the ruler to reign and make decisions that are difficult to make.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore). This belief is also present in the era due to the fact that in order to break these social classes and strict caste system there must be a government that supports this and keeps the people safe, it may seem as if it is going against humanism, however, it is not, this goes along with the idea that people are taking control of their own lives, in a safe environment. Which is Machiavelli’s point in The Prince, that what the prince is doing to the people is unjust by not allowing them to have their own personal freedoms and to be able to break from their positions Machiavelli’s ideas and beliefs are genuine, however the way he addresses the prince is…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to him, people would essentially give up their power to one ruler who in turn, the ruler would ensure they could live peacefully. The only right left to the people, after they give all their power to a ruler and agree to abide by those laws, is the right to not be killed. Similar to Machiavelli, Hobbes also believes that fear is key to maintain power and political authority…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, Locke criticizes Machiavelli’s work. For Locke, the government should encompass the manner of fair play and equity. In order for the government to survive, it must serve the best interest of the people. If it is not addressing the needs of the people, then the citizens have all the right to rebel and overthrow the government. Locke who believes that people are inherently good shares the same sentiment with Machiavelli who, on the other hand, believes that people should be controlled because there are inclinations that they become selfish and greedy.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Classical liberalist such as John Stuart Mill explained that the government should attempt to help the welfare of its people. Mill saw the problem with government and realized the change he wanted to see. Mill explain that because government is now responsible for people, the majority of society could use government to deny liberty to the minority or those who opposing views. This is a beneficial ideology to society because it will promote welfare to help people overcome obstacles. It is human nature to naturally be evil and we must have government to maintain and regulate society, in order to prevent citizens from trumping others rights.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Through fear, a prince’s power comes from his people being deterred from chaos through the recognition that there will be consequences rather than the abundance of the common people's love for their prince. That being said Machiavelli mentioned often throughout the text that a ruler if he wishes to keep the internal peace, must not be hated by the people he is ruling. Machiavelli does mention the ease in which a prince would be able to secure his place with his people for the common person if the new principality does not seem overly cruel in his role or take away privileges that have already been granted to the people or oppress them in any other manner. To reiterate, a negative reputation being acquired by a prince is of little consequence as long as he is not hated for his faults. For example, it is better for a prince to be perceived as frugal and have enough resources to support his state than generous and have to depend on others for support or worse have to…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays