In today's society, individuals tend to rely on the opinions of different people. In the reading, "The Order of Things," written by Malcolm Gladwell, states that there are several problems with ranking systems in today's world. Although ranking systems provide helpful lists to scan the best choices of items, these systems cannot be reliable because of biases that are extremely subjective as the result of their own purpose. Gladwell claims that nowadays, people do not actually question these systems; therefore, most people stop digging into researchers, and the majority are not aware of the negative side of rankings. In fact, the author exposes different examples to support his argument.
Throughout the reading, Gladwell presents examples to narrow down the big issue. Gladwell's diction persuades the audience by evoking ethos to elaborate his syllogism. Most ranking systems are heterogeneous. A piece of arrogance can lie within the people who are …show more content…
It affects people’s way of thinking. Gladwell’s conclusions are clear and precise. Ranking systems should not include only the wealthiest colleges because they are not the only institutions in the country. Many people have different opinions, and there should be certain possibilities to weight the criteria of the rankings to balance this problem.
Concluding with this, Malcolm Gladwell supports his main claim about the biases of ranking systems by providing factual examples. Along with rhetorical devices, he persuades his audience that ranking systems could be indeed harmful. Most of the time, ranking systems are based on what the proxies say. Money is what makes an institution or anything increase in their rankings to become the best of the best. People should never put their trust into numbers that are not precisely measured. In fact, these systems are not assembled to find an accurate answer but to gather a piece of the big picture of
Throughout the reading, Gladwell presents examples to narrow down the big issue. Gladwell's diction persuades the audience by evoking ethos to elaborate his syllogism. Most ranking systems are heterogeneous. A piece of arrogance can lie within the people who are …show more content…
It affects people’s way of thinking. Gladwell’s conclusions are clear and precise. Ranking systems should not include only the wealthiest colleges because they are not the only institutions in the country. Many people have different opinions, and there should be certain possibilities to weight the criteria of the rankings to balance this problem.
Concluding with this, Malcolm Gladwell supports his main claim about the biases of ranking systems by providing factual examples. Along with rhetorical devices, he persuades his audience that ranking systems could be indeed harmful. Most of the time, ranking systems are based on what the proxies say. Money is what makes an institution or anything increase in their rankings to become the best of the best. People should never put their trust into numbers that are not precisely measured. In fact, these systems are not assembled to find an accurate answer but to gather a piece of the big picture of