The Morally Ambiguous Character In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Improved Essays
Frankenstein In Mary Shelley’s, Frankenstein, a morally ambiguous character plays a pivotal role. The creature could be viewed as either purely evil or purely good. The creature’s moral ambiguity plays a significant part to the work as a whole. When thinking over the creature, many could debate whether he is good or bad. Victor Frankenstein didn’t take very good care of the creature in the story/novel. He didn’t pay too much attention to him and didn’t teach the creature lessons needed to survive in their society. If the creature was taught the lessons needed maybe he wouldn’t have turned out as bad. That possibly could have made an impact on the decisions he made. The creatures poor decisions throughout the novel made him an easy target …show more content…
Making the creature look purely good. Besides many of the creatures poor decisions and choices, he still had a decent heart. Towards the beginning of the novel, the creature is wandering around the village and ends up stealing food from a family. However, when the creature finds out the family is poor and doesn’t have much, he goes out of his way to cut wood and provide for the family. Another piece of evidence that supports that the creature besides being purely evil was also purely good was the fact that he felt remorse for the death of Frankenstein. Even though Frankenstein and the creature were not close and all the creature wanted was revenge, he still wanted the love from Frankenstein. The creature’s ambiguity was very evident in the novel, Frankenstein. His ambiguity was also significant to the work as a whole. What made the creature morally ambiguous was the fact you couldn’t pinpoint exactly what he actually was. Throughout the novel what-ifs are common. For example, if Frankenstein would’ve created the creature, would the creature actually react the way he did? Would Frankenstein's wife still be alive? In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley portrays a morally ambiguous character. The creature could be looked at as being purely evil or purely bad. His ambiguity was a significant part of the work as a

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Mary Wollstonecraft argues that myths such as the Fall and Prometheus are designed ‘to persuade us that we are naturally inclined to evil’. Discuss this claim in relation to two texts from the course. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Angela Carter’s ‘The Bloody Chamber’ both discuss the nature of evil and whether or not ‘we are naturally inclined’ to it. These two texts both agree and disagree with Mary Wollstonecraft’s claim in various ways. The following essay will explore how these texts discuss the claim that ‘we are naturally inclined to evil’.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley uses parallelism between the lives of Victor Frankenstein and his monster to illustrate the coexistence of good and evil in all people, and that whether one is benevolent or malicious is a choice everyone must make. The novel is set during the early 1800’s in Western Europe, and it revolves around the war between the ingenious scientist Dr. Victor Frankenstein and his nameless reanimated creation. Through his perspective on the world, the monster (or as I’ll be calling him, Frankie,) chooses whether he will adopt a deportment of goodness or of wickedness. As he is created as a blank slate, he has no reason or motivation to initially be one or the other; however, he initially chooses kindness: “If any being felt emotions of benevolence towards me, I should return them a hundren and a hundredfold; for that one creature’s sake I would make peace with the whole land!”(Shelley 148).…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The innocent creature from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein just might not be as innocent or sane as one might think. The creature in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is without a doubt a psychopath or even a sociopath when looking at the details in his lifestyle, and the violent acts he committed throughout the novel. Furthermore, when analyzing the creature from the novel it demonstrates multiple psychopathic and sociopathic qualities, such as something like his impulsive behavior or how aggressive, it is, or how it showed absolutely no remorse for all the people it killed. Throughout the creature’s life is a hidden world of a psychopathic killer that can explain all of his actions from beginning to end, from the creature’s first kill to it’s supposed remorse, it felt for all the people he killed at the end of the story. Consequently, one may feel pity for the supposed innocent creature, Victor Frankenstein created, but when…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All of these murders however, came out of a lack of love and a cry for attention. The Creature knows no other way to reach out to Frankenstein and express his anger except through murder, which gives him power. Mary Shelley designed the novel in a way that made the reader sympathetic toward the Creature because of the rejection he felt, despite his best efforts to fit in. Also, Mary Shelley draws parallels between the Creature and Prometheus. Much like the Creature, the gods created Prometheus as the first human and abandoned him.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout Frankenstein, the creature demonstrates that it is a moral being. The creature is moral due to its practice of nonviolence. In his first contact with human society, the creature faces physical violence, as villagers attack him with stones. Rather than use his superior physical capabilities to fight with the villagers, the creature runs away, choosing the non-violent option. The villagers’ believe that the appearance of the creature, a harmless attribute, is justification for violence.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The monster’s flawed appearance caused his rejection, and his rejection brought about his revenge. The monster was abandoned by Dr. Frankenstein when he was first created. Because of Victor’s failure to accept the monster and raise him in a caring and nurturing environment, the monster was quickly harden by the rugged environment he was forced into. The villagers of the first village he encountered and the family he tried to befriend in cottage drove out the monster because of his grotesque appearance. Because humans “had spurned and rejected me [the monster]”, it burns the cottage and later strangles Frankenstein's nephew William.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ambition In Frankenstein

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Frankenstein, a novel written by Mary Shelley tells the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein and his creation of a monstrous creature. Throughout the novel we are able to witness the relationship between the monster and his creator while simultaneously following their individual paths as they cross one another. From each individual journey we see how appearance, ambition, lack of compassion, affection, grief and horror contribute to each story and play a leading effect in the perspective of monster and man. Victor, an ambitious scientist who dreams of making human kind better, creates a figure, later known as the creature, with intentions of helping to “banish disease from the human frame” (Shelley 23). He wants to save…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mary Shelley’s book, Frankenstein, proffers multiple meanings of the monster that can be drawn upon from the text depending on one’s perspective and analysis on the book. The book can be seen as a true story with a real monster who murdered Victor Frankenstein’s family for the monster’s want for revenge. However, this one side is only the surface of what the story is truly about. It only gives a one-dimensional view that everyone should be able to grasp from their first read of the book for personal enjoyment. Once someone ponders on the question “What if the monster is imaginary, a fictitious creature created by Victor or Walton?”…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is plausible to say that Victor Frankenstein’s actions instilled in the creature the vengeance he so dearly seeks. However, after the creature commits some of these acts of retribution, a sense of revenge is also instilled in Frankenstein, perpetuating this never ending cycle of revenge in the story. Shortly after the creature’s murders, Frankenstein thinks “I was possessed by a maddening rage when I thought of him, and desired and ardently prayed that I might have him within my grasp to a great and signal revenge on his cursed head" (Shelley, 202). In this moment, Frankenstein is willing to do anything to find the creature and avenge all of its wrongdoings. Afterwards, Victor Frankenstein’s sole purpose in life becomes to get revenge for everyone that the creature has taken away from him.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main topics of Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein appears as the desire for power. One character that shows its desire for power in Frankenstein is the creature, which Victor Frankenstein brought to life after almost two years of working only to flee in terror of it.. The creature shows this desire for power throughout the novel, especially when it begins to kill the people that Victor Frankenstein cares about. The creature almost immediately obtains its freedom at the beginning of the novel, when Victor Frankenstein flees from it in the laboratory after bringing it to life. The creature gains power over Victor Frankenstein’s life and influences starts to influence it after murdering William, Victor’s younger brother. By the time that William is murdered the monster appears to have a strong dislike for his creator and wishes to harm him and his family, resulting in William’s death.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Frankenstein’s course of action is arguably due to his parent’s emphasis on beauty early in the book and the detachment he experienced throughout his childhood from his parents. Nonetheless, Frankenstein’s refusal to be the father he has to be is absolutely atrocious. Just because the Creature does not meet Frankenstein’s beauty standards he decides to leave the Creature, his son, as a social outcast, longing for communication and love from others around him. Later the Creature successfully saves a drowning girl out of the goodness of his heart, but because of his appearance, is shot in the shoulder. The Creature understandably has a fit of rage, “This was then the reward of [the Creature’s] benevolence! ……

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All writers contribute to their chosen genres, either by adopting generic conventions or by exploring these conventions and adapting them to create new aspect of their genre, or even a new genre altogether. Mary Shelley and William Shakespeare exemplify these ideas of adoption and adaptation. Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is a classically gothic novel, it incorporates the supernatural with the realistic to create a horrific plot with deep psychological characters who’s actions question societal norms, morality and humanity. The text adopts but also adapts motifs of doppelgangers, forbidden knowledge and heroism. Shakespeare was a literary pioneer in almost every aspect and the genres of his plays were no different.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout life, positive and negative aspects of nature are expressed in a variety of ways. However, the tension between these two ideas is able to cause destruction and deprivation if overexpressed. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, both of these traits are conveyed through the characters of Dr. Victor Frankenstein and the artificial life that he creates. Both characters express a determined personality type and crave acceptance but convey it in various ways which emphasizes Shelley’s true opinion of human nature: how you are raised affects how you react in the future. Victor is an egotistical and ambitious scientist who is obsessed with life and how it’s created.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maryssa Smith Professor Nancy Cassano English 1302 March 11, 2015 Frankenstein: Man or Monster When reading “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley, one is inevitably placed in a position of judgement. The two main characters, Victor Frankenstein and the Monster seem to be in direct opposition at first glance. But the further you read the more blurred the lines of character separation become, until ultimately, the roles are reversed and you find yourself drawn in by the vulnerability and humanitarian of the Monster and you are convinced that Frankenstein himself is the real monster.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The monster is inherently “benevolent and good,” but his lonesome journey transforms him into a “fiend” (Shelley 87). The monster describes himself saying, “ ‘My heart was fashioned to be susceptible of love and sympathy; and, when wrenched by misery to vice and hatred, it did not endure the violence of the change without torture, such as you cannot even imagine’ ” (Shelley 209-210). Created with an instinctive need for nurture from his creator, the monster was not capable of living alone in his society. In Stephen Gould’s view, “Frankenstein 's creature… is, rather, born capable of goodness, even with an inclination toward kindness, should circumstances of his upbringing call forth this favored response.”…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays