Making the creature look purely good. Besides many of the creatures poor decisions and choices, he still had a decent heart. Towards the beginning of the novel, the creature is wandering around the village and ends up stealing food from a family. However, when the creature finds out the family is poor and doesn’t have much, he goes out of his way to cut wood and provide for the family. Another piece of evidence that supports that the creature besides being purely evil was also purely good was the fact that he felt remorse for the death of Frankenstein. Even though Frankenstein and the creature were not close and all the creature wanted was revenge, he still wanted the love from Frankenstein. The creature’s ambiguity was very evident in the novel, Frankenstein. His ambiguity was also significant to the work as a whole. What made the creature morally ambiguous was the fact you couldn’t pinpoint exactly what he actually was. Throughout the novel what-ifs are common. For example, if Frankenstein would’ve created the creature, would the creature actually react the way he did? Would Frankenstein's wife still be alive? In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley portrays a morally ambiguous character. The creature could be looked at as being purely evil or purely bad. His ambiguity was a significant part of the work as a
Making the creature look purely good. Besides many of the creatures poor decisions and choices, he still had a decent heart. Towards the beginning of the novel, the creature is wandering around the village and ends up stealing food from a family. However, when the creature finds out the family is poor and doesn’t have much, he goes out of his way to cut wood and provide for the family. Another piece of evidence that supports that the creature besides being purely evil was also purely good was the fact that he felt remorse for the death of Frankenstein. Even though Frankenstein and the creature were not close and all the creature wanted was revenge, he still wanted the love from Frankenstein. The creature’s ambiguity was very evident in the novel, Frankenstein. His ambiguity was also significant to the work as a whole. What made the creature morally ambiguous was the fact you couldn’t pinpoint exactly what he actually was. Throughout the novel what-ifs are common. For example, if Frankenstein would’ve created the creature, would the creature actually react the way he did? Would Frankenstein's wife still be alive? In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley portrays a morally ambiguous character. The creature could be looked at as being purely evil or purely bad. His ambiguity was a significant part of the work as a