Monarchies In The United States

Improved Essays
The Middle East has been known for being a hot spot of political turmoil and suppression. Surprisingly, however, there have been a group of nations who have been able to maintain their authoritarian regimes within their respective states, all of which then form the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). These states include Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, and Oman which will be discussed more specifically in this paper. All of the nations in the GCC take the form of monarchies and are the last remaining monarchies in the Middle East. In order to maintain its authoritarian government, Sultan Qaboos of Oman has led his nation to be classified as “not free” by the Freedom House, an organization that studies various countries’ levels of freedom …show more content…
Absolute Monarchy is a system in which a single ruler rules with complete command over the entire government. This is differentiated from a similar version of monarchy, Dynastic Monarchy, in which the ruler has the aid and help of his family, who in turn keep a check on such a ruler. Qaboos took over in a palace coup in 1970, rebelling against his father and instituting an Absolute Monarchy. The government of Oman is constituted of an absolute monarch and “since the legislative power resides in the monarch (Art. 42), the Oman Council (Art. 58) is an advisory institution rather than a full parliamentary body”. This body is part elected, the Majlis Al Shura, and part appointed by the Oman, the Majlis Al Dawla. This allows for some electoral process for the citizens, who, if 21 and above, were granted almost universal suffrage in 2003. However, this group is merely a consultation body and thus has no power whatsoever over the legislative duties or actions of the state, which rest solely in the hands of Qaboos. This leads to a lack of political parties, as they are outlawed in Oman, and thus the Omani government, and Qaboos himself, face no political opposition. This helps the regime maintain control over the people as there is no threat to its power nor an alternative leader for the people to get behind. Previously, although, there was the Popular Front for the Liberation of Oman which fought for the creation of a democratic state in Oman. This eventually disappeared from Omani politics altogether, or as Abdulla Habib, a fervent opponent of the government, said, “[the] Popular Front is finished and no longer represents a political or military threat to the government”. There are still calls for democracy however, but those calls do not grow into anything more than mere calls. On top of outlawing political parties, Qaboos does not have his family keep

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In American Sovereigns Fritz explains that the tensions between “alter and abolish” and “explicit and authentic acts” are essentially about the disagreement between the people and the new governments (both state and federal) on what constitutes as proper procedure on changing government. Fritz documented that many state constitutions included “alter and abolish” language as the American Revolution was still fresh in the people’s minds. These “alter and abolish”provisions connotated revolution as the means of change. However, no such “alter and abolish” provision exists in the U.S. Constitution from what I have read in the Constitution. Based upon that knowledge, I believe that the framers believed that the ability to amend the Constitution…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After a very traumatic experience with monarchies, the Voirpoua esd Flesil civilization decided not to have a monarchy for their government. Their government was a lot like our government today. Expect without a president. The people would choose representatives to work together to make the big decisions. Like declaration of war or relocation of the civilization.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The king kept the an army in the the colonies after the Seven year war without consent of the colonial legislatures. He forced them to do things without them actually being fully aware of why they were doing it. The king also rejected laws for example, he rejected the North Carolina law on setting up on court. Everything that colonist were forced to do was because the royal government had claimed all the power. The king had colonies house british troop that were stationed in America.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years leading up to the American Revolution, the colonies felt that British rule was oppressive. Events like the Stamp Act, passed by British Parliament in 1765, inflamed these feelings. Eventually, the colonies felt they needed to break free from British rule which led to the Declaration of Independence. Equal distribution of power would play a fundamental part in the system of Federalism. The three branches of government: the legislative, executive and judicial, exemplified this as each group had checks and balances to ensure no branch became too powerful.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A strong democracy is essential for a state’s freedoms, liberties, and its well being. In order to obtain these notions, a democracy must receive legitimacy from the people. Legitimacy is the concept in which the people believe and give their consent to the government for its right to rule. A democracy functions accordingly to people’s will, and legitimacy will only fortify a democracy as the people will be allowed to judge and express opinions to make final decisions regarding the status of government officials and their privilege to hold power and rule over the state and citizens. As a first time democracy, Xlandia can begin to build legitimacy as it “binds itself to the rule of law.”…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why England's Constitutional Monarchy is crucial to Western Civilization. By Kade Jett The United States of America has a constitution, which consist of rights for a citizen. This constitution was created for the people of the original thirteen colonies. The U.S.A fought for it’s freedom from the british in 1775 to 1783.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will look mainly at the Iranian Revolution and the impact of it on government and Islamist groups emerging. To start with, Gelvin points out two reasons for the emergence of social or political movements in the Middle East after they gained independence. The reasons he lists are nativism and demand for rights to be restored or improved upon. Nativism believe that to revive a community is to revert back to its defining traditions. The second reason is straightforward.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America’s Feudal System Thesis: Sharecropping provided former slaves, and poor whites, limited opportunity, unstable communities, and another means to control the newly created population. ¬ The end of slavery provided African Americans with a new start at life. Congressional support through Reconstruction hindered their success with the introduction of President Andrew Johnson.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The meaning and application of popular sovereignty has drastically changed due to many changed made to the constitution and many new laws put in place. In the beginning of the United State’s government, there were very few people that had a say in the government and could vote on changes to the government. Before many of the current amendments and laws were put into place, only old, white men that were property owners had an influence on the government. Popular sovereignty was very limited to a small amount of people in the United States, that often did not represent the majority of the country.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Recently our country has gone through the process of electing the 45th President of the United States. Although the country was split 50/50 on who to vote for Donald J. Trump came out victorious as the new President. After watching President Trump’s Inaugural Address I have come to the following conclusions about the topic of Popular Sovereignty. Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the people's rule, is the principle that the authority of a state and its government is created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives (Rule by the People), who are the source of all political power.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States Oligarchy

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages

    James M. Keating Dr. Paul Landow PSCI 8040 26 September 2014 Midterm Essay: The United States of an Oligarchy Introduction Based on common public discourse, left leaning circles from revolutionaries to communists love to point out the inconsistencies of democracy. The United States is always at the forefront of that conversation because of their overwhelming economic and military might (although the economic gulf that exists today is smaller than the decade following the Cold War). As the perceived democratic world leader, leftists ranging from Noam Chomsky (libertarian socialist) to Russell Brand (revolutionary), spend a majority of their time calling out the U.S. and the West for their tendency to appease to multinational corporations,…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Popular sovereignty is the idea that the authority of the state and its government is created and managed by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives who are the head of the political power. In essence, popular sovereignty is an idea which may not necessarily reflect or describe the reality of a political setting. Popular sovereignty is needed by each states in Agonistan. Majoritarian and Minoritarian argues that popular sovereignty demands for equal rights of all citizens as well as respect for the sovereign rights of nations. In short, popular sovereignty in the context of the situation in Agonistan implies that while having equal rights of all citizens, there should also be a soverignty with power and…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tawakkol Karman's Analysis

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tawakkol Karman describes the Arab Spring revolution movement, and demands support from around the world. Tawakkol Karman states that “our revolution is peaceful,” but “did not” receive the “international understanding,” and “support” (Karman 529, 530). By demonstrating that injustice still occurs in different places, the human rights activist expresses her wishes and hope for peaceful world, specifically for her country. Although some people consider Arab Spring is a peaceful movement, the others believe that this revolution caused a power void for terrorist groups to create chaos. In fact, Arab Spring revolution, as well as the others, question the purpose of violence and how the society defines the concept of…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism Vs Monarchy

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The world today has many forms of government such as absolute monarch, democracy, and dictatorship. In the past most of the world was monarch and still is today. Popular sovereignty was not introduced to the world until 1762 and did not take action until 1776 when America adopted it. However, it is quickly spreading throughout Europe today. Absolutism and popular sovereignty have many differences but are the two most common types of government on Earth.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From its creation, America has been a beacon of hope and freedom to many countries who have aspired to adopt their democratic values. Yet, these values have not always been sought after by other countries, and instead are sometimes imposed upon the ones who rarely accept them with open arms. The Middle East is a seamless example of countries exhibiting resistance to the American way of life and democracy; with many leaders rebelling against the notion due to religious reason. Particularly, Saudi Arabia has been a Middle Eastern Country that has had very close relationship the United States, and over time has adopted forms of its culture even though it clashes with their own. Saudi Arabia has become more Westernized and modernized with the discovery…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics