King Lear Stoicism Analysis

Improved Essays
Stoicism

To counter stoicism, the play presents itself first as a stoic world. Frye indicates in his essay that Albany and Edgar stands for the moralist (111); and Moretti in “Great Eclipse” argues that King Lear is in-between an old feudalist society and a new absolutist society. However, these characters does not stand for a vague, universal ethics; and feudalism, as a political concept, must have a reciprocal relationship with cultural doctrine as to integrate the social and the political. I suggest that stoicism, with its concrete pedagogy, makes the abstract concept of ethics and politics into practice. We cannot assert that Renaissance England is purely of stoicism for the Christianity also renders its influence, however, the stoicism
…show more content…
First, on the topic of love: Lear’s ignorance of himself results to the tragedy; both Harold Bloom and Stanley Cavell have argued that because of his love to Cordelia, whether an overflowing or avoiding kind, that he fails to keep himself upright. Whether it is a kind of love of overwhelming affection Cavell suggests, or the general love Bloom refers to, what matters is that he lacks self-knowledge of his own love. Epictetus, the stoic, has a moral story about the consequence of it, which is mentioned in Foucault’s lecture: there is a father runs away from his ill daughter because he is too upset by the condition of his daughter that he cannot bear the sight of her illness. Epictetus criticizes this attitude because the father forgets to follow the nature of family bond, but has too much affection towards his daughter as to forget recognizing himself as a father in the social frame. In Lear’s case, plot goes another way but much the same in depth: Lear is upset by Cordelia for he cannot bear her silence and rudeness; her refusal to express love in public hurts him. Cavell illustrates the twisted logic of Lear: his private love yields to public hatred. And this time the father expels the daughter so as to avoid her. Lear’s excessive affection leads to improper love and hate overlooking the social order. Epictetus had said, if one pay enough attention to what one …show more content…
“Care of the self” in stoicism is the first step towards caring others. Because, as abovementioned, in caring of oneself correctly one can know how to care and treat others properly. This principle can apply to the state, which contains the largest amount of others (Foucault 199). This principle constructs the basis of feudalism: one must know his nature and act accordingly; in the position of the king, then one should care the state. In the first scene we can see how Lear violates the principle: he succumbs to flattery. Here Foucault introduces two stoic concepts, anger and flattery, to illustrate the structure of power relation: the discussion of anger, in the context of Seneca and Plutarch, is about the superiority’s abuse of power to its inferior: father to his wife, children, and slaves; the Prince to his subjects. One’s anger means his uncontrollability of oneself, in case of authority, it means he fails to care himself and consequently exercise his power improperly (Foucault 374). Flattery, on the other hand, is the technique of the inferior: the flatterer gives false image to the superior as to take advantage of the power of the superior; the superior in this condition cannot recognize himself correctly (376). The discourses on anger, Foucault indicates, are originally the reaction to the political structural change of Rome from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Yet, the characters he creates, mostly Claudio, are easily mislead through one word, “disloyal.” Claudio was told by Don John that his lover was unfaithful. For her to be separated from the ideal woman fidelity causes Claudio to react deceitful and overprotective…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juliet’s rebellion enrages her father to a degree to which he becomes cruel and disbelieving of anything that she has to say. Therefore, when forsaking her identity by defying her father, Juliet causes a conflict of trust between the two of them, thereby putting Capulet in a suspicious state of mind. Likewise, Romeo’s broken identity results in a monstrous conflict. His determination for peace with Tybalt, is the opposite of what Mercutio- Romeo’s loyal friend- has in mind, who rather thinks of this approach, as “calm, dishonourable, vile submission!” (3.1.70). When Romeo tries to show love for Tybalt and refuses to fight, Mercutio’s fatal flaw, his hot-headedness, emerges.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sophacles uses this conflict to guide the audience in realising Creon’s complete tyrannical nature and misogyny. The audience are lead to despise Haemon and feel saddened by Antigone, the heroine’s fate. Creon’s fear of disobedience in his family leads him to completely reject Haemon as his son and cast him out; this act further signs Creon’s downfall in the context of the genre. Sophacles begins to foreshadow future events to reveal the consequences of Creon not listening to rational advice which is an element of tragedy that links the characters destiny with their…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The relationship ends and Lott now tries to come to terms with the loss of his love. Lott does this in two obvious stages: anger and sadness. These two opposing forces are very common reactions after a relationship ends. In sonnet LXXVI, he exclaims, “But she was selfish, frivolous, and vain—/Her soul untouch’d by any gentle strain—/Her eye unlit by any tender gleam—“. Lott is expressing his feeling of anger by exploring the nature of what he didn’t like about his lover.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Machiavelli 's The Prince it is clear that he has a negative view of human nature. Immanuel Kant’s ([1784] 2013) view on human nature in relation to enlightenment is that “Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large proportion of men, even when nature has hong emancipated them from the alien guidance (naturaliter majorettes) nevertheless gladly remain Immature for life”. From my knowledge on both philosophers I formulate the opinion that Kant’s views of a leader is an authority figure that embodies a teacher while Machiavelli 's view is a leader that is strictly a dictator, however, both philosophers make it apparent that people are in fact in need of a leader. I believe that with leadership comes the question of how much concern there should be on a subject’s opinion. Machiavelli suggests that a prince should concerned with a subjects opinion, but must remain cruel to avoid disobedience.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theme Of Flaws In Othello

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Othello’s opinions of Desdemona cause problems in their relationships and also facilitates Othello to want to kill her. He does not listen to what she has to say, and before he kills her, Desdemona asserts “Since guiltiness I know not, but yet I feel I fear” then Othello responds “Think on thy sins” (5.2.38-39), proving his disbelief of her honesty. When having a conversation with Emilia about Desdemona’s infidelity, Emilia becomes shocked that Othello does not trust her, asking “That she was false to wedlock?” to which Othello replies “Ay with Cassio” (5.2.142-143). Soon after, Emilia finds Desdemona’s dead body and realizes that Othello is the murderer. Emilia then becomes enraged at Othello, who realizes that he was wrong about his opinion of Desdemona’s disloyalty, and regrets killing Desdemona so much…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His disapproval of King Claudius caused him to need a stronger relationship causing him to unintentionally fall for his mother to satisfy this void. When Claudius married Gertrude, Hamlet showed a vast amount of anger and did not express many reasons behind the anger. This could be because he was upset that Claudius was taking her away from him, even if he was psychologically unaware of why he was feeling this anger. When Hamlet exclaims “She married. O, most wicked speed, to post with such dexterity to incestuous sheets!…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Steinbeck reinforces this dislike towards Curley as Curley’s wife is jealous of Lennie because he can “‘talk to people, but [she] can’t talk to nobody but Curley. Else he gets mad’” (Steinbeck 87). Steinbeck relates how Curley’s wife’s ethical choices are impacted by the actions of others in the way Curley disregards his wife, leaving her with the desire to find…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eddie’s unusual position of his fatherly figure along with his miss-developed feelings make him a recipe for disaster in Catherine’s life. His sexual emotions for her disable him from being able to give proper support to his niece. He applies his feelings towards his fatherly figure position, which ultimately leads to the downfall of the relationship, or the conversion from love to…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, Hamlet acts quite cruel unlike a usual hero. Hamlet is rude to Ophelia after she breaks up with him. He mocks her, and he calls her weak. Hamlet’s attitude towards his mother is also quite barbaric. Hamlet actually says to his mother that he “must be cruel only to be kind” (3.4.179) when he speaks harshly.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays