Human Nature In Aristotle's Politics

Superior Essays
In Aristotle’s Politics, human nature is the driving force behind the formation of community, political practice, government, and moral code. Ability to speak and communicate efficiently sets human apart from the rest of the animal kingdom, paving the way to revealing “the advantageous and the harmful, and hence also the just and unjust.” (1, 2) In other words, the inherent ability to express and give and receive feedback creates the foundation of fundamental ideas and rules upon which cities or countries and their governments are built. Notions of selfishness portray individuals in a negative fashion, but one that unites them through an instinctive tendency to come together “for the sake of living.” (1, 2) Dichotomy between classes poses a …show more content…
(6,2) The implications of human nature above shape the overall idea that our inherent desire to pursue happiness and what is best for ourselves. Following this train of thought, it may be concluded that through history and a Darwinian-like evolution of politics and governments, democracy was born. Winston Churchill’s famous phrase, “Democracy is the worst from of government, except for all the others” sums this notion. Human nature drives us to achieve the best outcome, thus through deliberate and accidental experimentation alike, one form of political system prevails above the rest, and that has landed us as the feet of democratic practice. Even still, many concerns exist within such a system; how is justice and virtue achieved, who even decides exactly what is just and what is not? Today we still find that these questions remain unanswered in some respect. The recent disputes regarding police brutality pose serious and significant concerns about the current practice of upholding justice in our country. For justice to be exactly that, just, it must be wholly indiscriminant and uphold the ethical values upon which the country is founded, freedom and equality for all. This time of great distress along with countless events of similar proportions throughout history are exactly what promotes change in politics and slowly push us closer to a “perfect” society. Although a utopian society may never be attained due to the human tendency to want more and better things, these events are important in that they provide the entire community, both the rulers and the ruled, with a reality check and an update of sorts, on the constantly evolving ideas and opinions of the very individuals that mold society. However displeasing the riots or violent the debates, they are ultimately imperative and beneficial in the long run for the betterment of our political systems. “That the same way of life must

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 5 Of Dahl Summary

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    54) In order for citizens to behave as morally responsible, the democratic process most maximize opportunity to live under laws that the citizens think are important as well. The next point is “Democracy fosters human development more fully than any feasible alternative.” (Dahl, pg. 55) this is absolutely true, citizens must be able to protect their own interests and have a say in important decisions. The ability to engage in open discussions with others about issues is important because it give people an opportunity to have their voices heard.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers are often criticized for their ideas because people in the society we live In are afraid of change. Aristotle is a human who did nothing to harm people but spread his philosophy about the “true” and “corrupt” government, as he believed that his philosophy would provide the “best opportunity to lead a good life.” (Atkinson 43) His ideas ridiculed, Aristotle tried to teach people that citizens under a defective government will become interested with the pursuits of a ruler, but not the pursuits of a ruling class. Aristotle founded a school of his own, where people would learn and ponder about a true form of government, but the world we live in has pushed aside the ideas of what Aristotle believed was a corrupt government.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Best Government According to Waterman Lecture Notes, (1-3), Aristotle felt that the best government was the monarchy, a political system in which a state is ruled by a monarch, especially a king or queen, (governed by one)and by hereditary rights, followed by the aristocracy (governed by few) , people of the highest social or people of noble families or the highest social class, and that these type or class of people are the very best person or people, would most justly and effectively rule the society. Aristotle believed that almost all of the virtues relate to how we live with one another. We need other people to be generous or courageous towards (Waterman Lecture Notes1-3). According to Roochnik (220), Aristotle base his political science on a belief “that the city-state is the overarching organization of a variety of smaller organizations such as the family, the household, and the village in the city –state”, three levels; “Protection – From both natural forces and human and animal predators, Economic Cooperation – We benefit from skilled people learning various trades so everyone doesn’t have to do everything for oneself and, Ability to Live and…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maimonides’ theologically-inspired interpretation of rule-utilitarianism draws in foundation from a precept he devotes much ink to settling the merits of: The True Law [the six hundred and thirteen commandments of the Torah] … give[s] us the twofold perfection. It aims first at the establishment of good mutual relations among men by removing injustice and creating the noblest feelings. In this way the people … stay and continue in one condition, and every one can acquire his first perfection [well-being of the body].…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Politics and ethics are two vital components of a functioning society. When these two components are carefully balanced a sate/society can remain organized and fair to its citizens. In a realistic society the idea of what political ethics and human nature consist of varies, but in an idealistic society political ethics and human nature possess a common ground. Political ethics and human nature were a mutual understanding at some point but as societies grew, citizens began to think as individuals instead of as a collective. As a result of this self-serving behavior, inequality and the mistreatment of others quickly followed.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Government, on the other hand is a ‘necessary evil,’ and is existent only to stray away immoral behavior. As populations grow, governance through elections deems necessary for the stability of a society. Thomas…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Rhetoric Analysis

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates as one of the founders of Western philosophy opened a new chapter for the humankind. He considers rhetoric as a form of deception which only casually informs people for the sake of arguing for egotistical motives. He initially has started questioning almost everything around him and was looking for logical answers. So, as a person, who believed in the reasons he did not want to accept any position without a thought. Socrates believed that the art of rhetoric does not require lots of research and in-depth knowledge.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kallipolis is a perfectly structured society in which justice is achieved at the social and interpersonal realms. It is ruled by a philosopher king, who maintain the peace and harmony in the ideal society. According to Plato in The Republic, the philosopher king possesses the qualities to be the rightful king to rule in Kallipolis. Philosophers are qualified to rule because they have a understanding of the Forms or the truth, their wisdom allows them to understand justice and their knowledge makes them superior than others. However, a philosopher can be a tyrant in disguise.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Aristotle's Politics, translated by Carnes Lord, a city containing three parts, the rich, the poor and the middle thrives the most in comparison to other regimes. The middle class acts in a way that benefits themselves without causing disruption to the society. They balance out the rich and the poor by preventing one side from taking too much control. Book V, chapter 11, starts by pointing out this division into three parts (1295a) and concludes the section with how the middle stabilizes society (1296b). From the beginning of the section, Aristotle displays the virtue of the middle since they are a mean that the society uses to provide a third entity that is not rich or poor.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature and politics are inseparable. Raw, overpowering, and mighty, human nature is the dynamic force that drives political discourse. While Sophocles’ Antigone and Thucydides’ On Justice, Power, and Human Nature appear to be simply two independent works of antiquity, both convey timeless teaching on human nature. These interconnected lessons are relevant in modern political leadership and serve as a guide for moderation, justice, and engagement.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critique logic of Aristotle understands of the nature(s) of the human soul. According to Aristotle, human nature refers to the unique characteristics in a human being. Some of these characteristics include the way of thinking, feeling and acting. These characteristics are in human beings, and they occur naturally, independently of the influence of culture.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s The Republic, he posits that the perfect city will be virtually homogenous, and that there can be no division in the citizens of the city if it is to succeed. Aristotle, on the other hand, claims in his Politics that the perfect city will be as distant from that of Plato’s as possible, and instead will have a variety of different people within it. As Aristotle’s argument evolves, however, he determines that the citizens of a city should still be similar in a variety of ways and that the city must have some unity in order to thrive. Plato’s view of unity within his republic in speech is relatively simple. He argues that if there is any division within a city, it will not be ideal.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays