Her doctors contemplated using Dr. Snow but due to Professor Charles Meigs advising against chloroform, prudence won and the Queen was denied chloroform (Poovey, 1986). Perspectives changed and doctors became increasingly confident with chloroform, furthermore when the Queen asked for chloroform it was provided to her with the support of Prince Albert and Dr. Snow. During the birth itself chloroform meet the Queen’s expectations and her recovery was quick compared to previous births (Snow, 2008). Despite this the Lancet declared chloroform to be evil and stating in an article that “in no case could it be justified or administer chloroform in a perfectly normal labour, but the responsibility of advocating such a proceeding in the case of the Sovereign of these realms would indeed be tremendous” (Snow, 2008). Although many still argued the uses of chloroform during births, however the debate disappeared and the Royal Seal of approval established chloroform as “one of the best blessings of time” (Ramsay,
Her doctors contemplated using Dr. Snow but due to Professor Charles Meigs advising against chloroform, prudence won and the Queen was denied chloroform (Poovey, 1986). Perspectives changed and doctors became increasingly confident with chloroform, furthermore when the Queen asked for chloroform it was provided to her with the support of Prince Albert and Dr. Snow. During the birth itself chloroform meet the Queen’s expectations and her recovery was quick compared to previous births (Snow, 2008). Despite this the Lancet declared chloroform to be evil and stating in an article that “in no case could it be justified or administer chloroform in a perfectly normal labour, but the responsibility of advocating such a proceeding in the case of the Sovereign of these realms would indeed be tremendous” (Snow, 2008). Although many still argued the uses of chloroform during births, however the debate disappeared and the Royal Seal of approval established chloroform as “one of the best blessings of time” (Ramsay,