Atheism Vs Religion

Improved Essays
Introduction
Atheism can be defined as a belief system that negates the existence of gods. Atheists believe that there is no god. Religion on the other hand is hinged on the belief in the existence of gods who are considered to be influential in the lives of the believers. There exists the idea that eventually, atheism will become more prominent than religion and this can be attributed to various factors. This essay intends to prove the idea that atheism would eventually trump over religion.
These arguments for the dominance of atheism can be categorized under philosophical, historical and social perspectives. One of the chief reasons is the lack of empirical proof of the existence of god. People have overtime assumed this existence based
…show more content…
This further opposes the inclusivity that should encompass the worship of a god as presented by religion. This ideology in a way strengthens the argument of the atheists against religion. The existence of god is seen as a subjective experience where different people have experienced god through different ways for instance through dreams, visions while some have only seen him through the angels (Honderich, 1995). This further negates the assumptions of religion. Questions have also arisen concerning the origin of god where people have found it hard to believe that god might have arisen from nothing. As the Christians claim that god is the creator, then one is bound to ask about who created the god who created everything (Hancock, 1996).
Omniscience is also a paradox that atheists find very contradictory. This is based on the idea that this god knows everything and by so doing, he cannot forget but the paradox is that by forgetting some things, then he does not then know everything as claimed. For example, when god forgets his people and lets them suffer then it is true that he does not indeed exist (Drachman,
…show more content…
They further posit that religion passes very important teachings that impact positively in all aspects of human existence. Believers have also resorted to using nature as a clear evidence of the existence of a more supernatural being that must have created all the elements such as lakes, rivers and other features. There is also the argument based on consciousness which argues that based on some of the great phenomena that we encounter in the universe then our minds cannot fail to relate them to powers beyond human understanding for example the earthquakes and other phenomena (Honderich,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dawkins claims, “they appeal to faith” and “faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because the lack of evidence” (e). Dawkins is explaining the phenomenon that we call faith. He describes that people back-up religion with faith even though faith shows a lack of evidence. We must therefore question whether faith is good enough to be evidence of Gods existence. My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCloskey wrote a paper, “On Being an Atheist” in 1968. This paper was his way of trying to prove that there is no God. He compares a lot with atheist and theists ways of looking at how people believe in God and that he does not believe that there is a God with some of the ways that the world functions. An atheist is someone who does not believe, but he makes it seem like it is easier to be an atheist where he feels that theists are just miserable. He contends that theists really do not believe in the proofs, but turn to religion for other reasons.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence. Therefore, their support for the theory is not based on the lacking existence of God, but lack of knowledge to support the existence of God (Hick J. H., 1983). The religious belief that God exists is a common interest for all the religions, but none has a concrete way to explain…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    H. J. McCloskey wrote the article “ On Being an Atheist”. This very interesting article gave his personal opinion on why he did not believe in God. In his article he gives his opinions of the cosmological, and teleological arguments. The main argument he makes in his article is about the evil and hardship in the world which is suppose to be created by a caring and loving God. Though H.j Mcloskey wanted to have proof and contrary to his opinions of the cosmological and theological arguments along with his case for the problem of evil, his article only points to the fact that the only logical explanation for the creation of the world is the existence of a great architect which is God.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Noah Porter paraphrases Eph 2:12 as "Hopeless because Godless." Agnostics may say that they do not deny the existence of God. Whether they claim unknowableness of God or that the existence of God is unknown, in either case, they do not know God and hence they are in a Godless situation, and the above phrase may describe agnostics' condition. Porter cleverly points out that the ignorance of God, which was regarded as a sin, "is now taught as a necessity of reason" and "the unknowableness of God has been formulated as a philosophy." Thomas.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Significant evidence for God’s existence has failed to settle the ongoing debate regarding whether or not God exists. Philosophers have formulated theories to either prove or disprove God’s existence. Evidently, there is not a correct theory since God’s existence can actually ever be proven, however, there are philosophers who are more successful in arguing for their views of God’s existence compared to other philosophers. Thomas Aquinas, a renowned philosopher and regarded as one of the greatest Christian theologians, philosophized about the existence of God. Aquinas’ five ways thoroughly explain how God exists by noting how certain notions in our universe cannot work solely on their own.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that true knowledge can be based only on facts, and any idea which is not supported by a valid scientific argument should perish. Since religion cannot provide a reasonable answer to criticism, it is often beaten by anyone who identifies the inconsistency between the shared views of the church and gathered facts from science. But is there any solution to such a significant problem which will end the numerous and meaningless arguments? During the 19th century the idea that there was a contradiction between the scientific knowledge and religious faith was widespread amongst the people. It is not a secret that science and religion are quite opposite especially in their explanations of why we must do things in a particular…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, it backfired greatly due to the lack of positive evidences and the many contradictory principles that could not be reconciled. Christianity simply could not be thought of scientifically, as the Church stated, God is all-powerful thus he cannot be confined to the laws of nature that we know of. The scientific context only served to highlight the flaws of Christianity, which skeptics immediately used to discredit the Christian community’s beliefs. To make-up for those flaws, the Church tried to erase the Devil, thus removing the contradiction of good and evil within God. However, by doing so, ecclesiastics had to build a complex argumentation to avoid mention the principle of the Devil and became lost in it, creating more confusion than clarification.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    God he believed could no be all good or all powerful if evil existed. He rejected counter argument such as god needing evil as he stated that this contradicted the argument that god was omnipotent. He also rejected the idea that human free will was an explanation for evil because this would also make god no longer all powerful or all good in his…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Being An Atheist

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In an article titled, “On Being an Atheist” McCloskey enumerates his belief that theism is not the comfortable belief system that most theists believe it to be. In this article, he addresses three common arguments, he refers to them as proofs, that theism claims as justification for its belief in God as the supreme being that created the universe. Although McCloskey attempted to disprove theism by addressing issues within the belief system, his arguments are still inconclusive and do not definitively disprove theism. There is one issue within McCloskey’s article that can benefit from some clarification before other arguments can be made. In his article, McCloskey often uses "proofs" to refer to the justification that theists use.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics