The impact of immigration has been felt throughout the world, particularly in developed countries. Consequently, the diverse nature of people has led to the differentiation of both opportunities and challenges relating to the definition of the impeding economic inclusion and active citizenship of immigrants. As a result, certain challenges have been noted in relation to the particular differences between the immigrants and the natives. Some of them are inclusive of mistrust, segregation and employment. It is therefore vital for assessments to focus on the effects of immigration on social cohesion and other practices. This is particular felt by the natives who perceive them as competition to their personal and communal development. The social
…show more content…
Dobria et al (2013) and her colleagues propose an acute structure for the assessment of the attitudes directed towards immigrants in the context of immigration, social capital and social cohesion. Their argument is that the conception of the ambivalent attitudes towards the immigrant factions are a display of the disparate array within the social construct, value-based activity and the predominant sociopolitical climate. Dobria applies the theory of item response as well as multiple regression tool in her study. She identifies and associates the stereotypes of varied immigrant factions to faction based policy attitudes. There is a need for social capital and public policy tools to be considered in achieving social cohesion as it should integrate an indebtedness to the alternating ideas pertaining to social capital and its roots in a coarse immigration …show more content…
In the authors’ work, an empirical study is conducted to test the relationship between current studies and ideological events relating to inter-faction attitudes. According to Emily and her colleagues, there is a minimal difference between natives and migrants (Emily et al, 2013). She further provides an overview of the risk of protective factors such as conflicting roles and discrimination between ethnic lines that has caused variations in the indigenous structure and therefore resulted to deteriorating socioeconomic intensities. The main challenge facing young migrants is a response to the needs of the social services immigrants through the designation of suitable programs that can subsidize towards a positive psychological and socio-cultural
Dobria et al (2013) and her colleagues propose an acute structure for the assessment of the attitudes directed towards immigrants in the context of immigration, social capital and social cohesion. Their argument is that the conception of the ambivalent attitudes towards the immigrant factions are a display of the disparate array within the social construct, value-based activity and the predominant sociopolitical climate. Dobria applies the theory of item response as well as multiple regression tool in her study. She identifies and associates the stereotypes of varied immigrant factions to faction based policy attitudes. There is a need for social capital and public policy tools to be considered in achieving social cohesion as it should integrate an indebtedness to the alternating ideas pertaining to social capital and its roots in a coarse immigration …show more content…
In the authors’ work, an empirical study is conducted to test the relationship between current studies and ideological events relating to inter-faction attitudes. According to Emily and her colleagues, there is a minimal difference between natives and migrants (Emily et al, 2013). She further provides an overview of the risk of protective factors such as conflicting roles and discrimination between ethnic lines that has caused variations in the indigenous structure and therefore resulted to deteriorating socioeconomic intensities. The main challenge facing young migrants is a response to the needs of the social services immigrants through the designation of suitable programs that can subsidize towards a positive psychological and socio-cultural