The Freedom Of The United States ' Restraints On Freedom Essay

1497 Words Nov 21st, 2016 6 Pages
Pope John Paul II said “freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought”. Meaning someone may not agree with everything they are legally authorized to do, but they still have that right to do it if they please. Most believe that the United States’ restraints on freedom are slim, nevertheless there is still one major controversy people like to argue. The freedom to use drugs. What one does in their personal life and home, including the use of drugs, should be accepted as morally permissible as long as no direct harm is done to others. Whether it be because of privacy, Utilitarianism, Mill’s Harm Principle, or just freedom in general, people have the liberty to fulfill their life to the standard they choose. One of the perks of residing in the United States is our freedom. In the very 1st Amendment it specifies that we have the freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly. And in the 4th Amendment it talks about how we have the right to privacy without search and seizure. Therefore, people should be allowed to use that privacy and freedom to their advantage and use drugs if that’s what they choose to partake in. As long as using drugs is not leading to direct harm being enforced onto other people, then what one does in their own home should not be anyone else’s business, let alone illegal. Adults should be available to choose what they do in the privacy of their home, as long as no direct harm is being enforced. Along…

Related Documents