The Four Pillars Of The Juvenile Justice System

Decent Essays
Law / Criminal Justice
Course name:
Student name:
Instructor’s name
August 27, 2017

Question:
Please identify and explain the three conceptual pillars of the juvenile justice system (age of responsibility, loco parentis and parens patriae)
Answer:
Juvenile justice is the area of criminal law applicable to persons not old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts. In most states, the age for criminal culpability is set at 18 years. Juvenile law is mainly governed by state law and most states have enacted a juvenile code. The main goal of the juvenile justice system is rehabilitation rather than punishment
The juvenile system was erected upon 3 conceptual pillars:
1. Age of Responsibility :
It is at what age is a person responsible for his or her conduct. It all depends on what the offense is and in what state. Every state is different for purpose of criminal prosecution. Usually, it is between ages of 16 to 18 years and older.
…show more content…
If they were convicted, they would be sentenced like adults.
2. Parens Patriae: The state is the supreme guardian of all children within its jurisdiction, and state courts have the inherent power to intervene to protect the best interests of children whose welfare is jeopardized by controversies between parents. This inherent power is generally supplemented by legislative acts that define the scope of child protection in a state. This concept is used to explain the state's duty to protect minors who lack proper care and custody from their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequently, they are more prone to risk taking and peer influence than adults; they think less about their future and express their emotions in more volatile ways. The juvenile system recognizes this distinct adolescent nature, and allows for recovery through developmentally appropriate programs, making young adults under eighteen better suited for the juvenile system rather than the adult system. However, when young law-breakers murder or rape someone, it is much more difficult call on whether they should be tried as adults or juveniles. The decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, depending on the severity, motive, and nature of the crimes. For example, a sixteen-year-old boy murdering his father to protect his sister warrants a different analysis than a case of a remorseless sixteen-year-old boy who murdered a mother and her two young children to steal a car.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Development of Juvenile Justice is a response to youth who committed crimes is split between two desires, the focus on rehabilitation and intervention and on the other side of the extreme is punishment, the want to care for the public good rather than the delinquent with a more punitive hand. In Rethinking Juvenile Justice, Elizabeth S. Scott and Laurence Steinberg have wrote about this issue. The two authors start at the legal framework for youth justice in the United States and how it developed with foresight and clear evidence. Making policies on moment emotion rather with logic and analyzed information.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From the time the juvenile court has developed, a lot of ethical questions have been raised. The biggest ethical issue right now in the juvenile justice system is kids being charged as adults. Juveniles are being treated as adults. For example, sometimes they don't even know that their actions are not acceptable and that they are a crime. An 8 or 10 year old will not know that hurting someone physically or killing them is a crime and they end up in jail.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Historically, children over 14 were presumptively culpable for their crimes. In the late 19th century, juvenile justice reformers advocated for the creation of a separate judicial system that emphasized rehabilitation rather than punishment, and judicial discretion rather than procedural formality. This movement was driven by concerns that juvenile offenders were different than adult offenders, and might benefit from alternative forms of judicial processing (Tanenhaus 2004, 2002). The juvenile court system spread rapidly throughout the United States. Growing fears of juvenile crime and skepticism about rehabilitation led many states to reconsider the thought of processing serious juvenile offenders in what appeared to be a lenient juvenile justice system (Feld, 1999).…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile law is typically governed by the state and most states set the age for criminal culpability at eighteen (deferring between seventeen and nineteen in some cases) (Walsh, 2016). The founders of the juvenile court saw it as “a system of justice that would protect youth from potential harms of adult court and that seek to not only punish but also to advance the ‘best interests’ of youth.” The juvenile court, unlike adult court, is guided by parens patriae, which is Latin for “state as parent.” The juvenile court is set up to act as the parent and it can punish and dismiss cases how it seems is appropriate, while also seeking to help juveniles in a way that can lead them to live productive lives (Mears, Kuch, Lindsey, Siennick, Pesta, Greenwald & Bloomberg,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the criminal justice system, there are many varying elements that contribute to the process through which accused offenders are counseled. As is expected, there are also numerous moral and ethical disputes that come with the territory, such as whether or not children, or 'juveniles', should be tried as adults in court for the violent crimes they commit. Some may say any child over the age of five should know the difference between right and wrong; for an individual to plan out a crime and act on it, the punishment should fit the offense, no matter the age. However, there is a thin line between vice and neurosis when it comes to juveniles. The incarceration of individuals under the age of sixteen at adult correctional facilities…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Meanwhile, children are given full responsibility for their case. By the same token, these juveniles must decide what to tell the police and defense attorneys. Juveniles must decide whether or not to follow the attorney's instructions, to testify, supply information regarding the prosecution, and whether to proceed to trial or plea bargain. Most children would not understand what to prepare or how to respond in such situation, let alone be able to comprehend the legal responsibilities. In extremely rare cases do courts consider whether children lack the maturity or development to stand trial due to their age.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles It is estimated by the Justice Department, that more than 10 percent of homicides are committed by minors (Khan). When an adolescent commits a serious crime, he or she is most likely charged as a minor, meaning they don’t have to serve jail time and instead are sent to a juvenile detention or rehabilitation center. The problem with charging kids based on age is that each person matures at different rates and times, like Cameron Williams who ran from the police after shooting one. The Jordan Brown case which involved an eleven year old who killed Kenzie Houk.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The juvenile corrections have undergone considerable transformation as the criminal justice system started to change in the 20th century. Major changes affected fields such as diversion, decriminalization, deinstitutionalization, and due process. A contributing factor to the harsh penalties of juveniles is a failure to address any of the social problems that are closely related to the causes of the delinquency. Those social problems are poverty, underemployment, family disorganization, and substance abuse. Juvenile offenders differ from adult offenders, thus are treated differently, but the policies in the United States are changing about qualifications of when a young criminal is considered and treated as a juvenile.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Juvenile Court System

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States juvenile court system has come a long way throughout the years. There has been many significant cases in the juvenile system that set the standard for what the system is now. Cases such as Kent vs. United States, In re Gault, and In re Winship are examples of major cases that challenged state rulings and later changed the technicalities of future, similar cases because they called upon the Supreme Court to change or state the rules. These three cases built some of the framework on what the juvenile justice system is today.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 100 years ago, the juvenile justice system was established in order to divert youthful offenders from the courts harsh punishments which has long lasting effects. The juvenile justice system focused and encouraged rehabilitation based on a juveniles individual needs. This system created for minors was to differ from those of the adult courts in a number of ways. Instead of focusing on the criminal act that had brought the juvenile offender into the court room in the first place, this system was designed to focus on the minor or juvenile as a person who was in need of assistance.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults for it is wrong to hold adolescents, under the legal age, to adult standards. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. These juveniles should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated in a positive manner, for they tend to come from troubled households and violent neighborhoods. In over half of the cases these troubled kids don’t know any different way than a life of crime when surrounded by both social and environmental factors that influence their delinquent actions. One must commemorate that juveniles are mentally underdeveloped, and still have time to innovate if their issues are dealt with precisely and accurately.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The juvenile justice system is based on the Juvenile Justice Act 1975, the Juvenile Justice Regulation 1969, the Law of Criminal Procedure 2001 and the Basic Law of Governance 1992. The minimum age for criminal responsibility is 12 years of age. This is different from the United States where age of criminal responsibility is pre-determined by state laws. The Juvenile Justice Regulation 1969 advised for non-isolation methods of rehabilitation, encouraging…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays