The Four Perspectives Of Functionalism

Better Essays
1) Describe each of the four approaches
Functionalism
Functionalism is a macro sociological theory based on society. Functionalism focuses on accepting social inequality and issues that relate to society for example social evils. Functionalism also focuses on why human rights issues exist such as poverty, hunger, slavery and genocide. Although these are negative impacts on society functionalism believes everything that happens in society has a meaning or purpose. For example: individuals see crime as a negative impact on society, but if there was no crime there would be less jobs which lead to unemployment for police, crime investigators etc. Functionalism also have the ability to bring communities together over a purpose or function. Such
…show more content…
Structuralism bases its context for the study of language, identifying structures in cultural and communal systems, explaining that objects and symbols give us as individual’s a certain meaning that we identify that object or symbol to. Emile Durkheim influenced structuralism to its existence in the early 1800’s where other theorists expanded his ideas and studies which are studied as scientifically and objectively as possible. Structuralism has the main idea that the meaning of words derives from the structure of language, not the words or objects they refer to. The main meaning of an object and symbol is created by the different related concepts that language recognizes. Structuralism has two main strengths which include. Firstly, being able to undertake an in-depth study of communication and culture. Secondly evolving from this being able to also study kinship, religions, cultural myths, ideology, and media. Structuralism does not reject any investigation of any other philologists. Structuralisms weakness includes having limited application because it studies, language while lacking the study as a society and social life for an individual. For example, political activity or empowerment. Secondly can only be useful when studying a desired aspect of social structures while rejecting the povitist conception of language. Strengths include …show more content…
This means that it focusses on the lower class making change towards the rich and focusing on the poor rather than the dominant. Marxism is best understood as a philosophy that is applied to society rather than a strict theoretical approach for example functionalism. Marxism generally believes that the dominant class who has the most wealth and power make the social system work for themselves not the majority. For example, the dominant class uses it for their selfish needs and to reinforce their dominant status. Created by ideas that reflected the awareness of the early industrial revolution in the UK and later on Europe. Marxists believe that societies experience struggle due to inequalities like wealth, value and power. Marxism contains different views but have common policies which include. Production is to produce great benefits for a minority at the expense of the exploited majority who are the poorer class. Meaning that it exploits the labour of its employees by paying them wages lesser value than the selling value of the item. If this did not happen the relationship could not function. The working class called the Proletariat produce goods to only benefit the dominant class called the bourgeoisie. This creates an economy which is the base to a social structure, with social forms that are nicknamed superstructure which is learning the normality

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    While the debate between Mises and Marx continued, other philosophers would also debate if capitalism and socialism was better, and how each system would affect the entire society. Marx was against capitalism because of the gap between the two social classes that the capitalist system formed. Marx saw this struggle first hand during the Industrial Revolution and decided to write in his “Communist Manifesto”. He saw how the working poor became more of a commodity as the bourgeoisie obtained more and more power. Marx said that capitalism would make the rich richer and the poor poorer.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, Mill is willing to admit that capitalism can at times depress wages, but he qualifies that remark by espousing that all wage declines mirror market fluctuations but competition will eventually revamp workers’ wages (Mill 249, 256). A large portion of Mills’ argument for private property is constructed when contrasting capitalism to the schematics of communist property. Mill asserts numerous facets that he defines as lacking in communism. First of all, managers of private property have motive, incentive, and a large stake in producing as efficiently as possible (Mill 262-263). Additionally, Mill notes that a transformation to altruistic form of shared property would be a challenging endeavor to establish universal conformity to a new economy, and that transformation in…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They condemned the latter for their “brutal exploitation” of labour (1848, p5-8). The wealth that the Proletariats created were taken and given to the owners, maintaining the social hierarchy. Since the capitalist mode of production is based on private ownership of raw materials, therefore, these owners were the ones with the money and power. These capitalist owners used their money to “extract the greatest possible amount of surplus value” then buy the labour power of the lower social class, the Proletariats, and “exploit [it] to the greatest possible extent”. (Marx, 1867) Ironically, while capitalism flourished, the conditions of the Proletariats deteriorated (Boyer, 1998).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Immigrants are used as a tool for capitalist endeavors, because workers are cheap and flexible ,which divides working class organization and drives down the rule of labor power (Leon Guerrero 2016:71). Multiculturalism is a tool for the people in power, that could be politicized and turned into a conflict between different racial identities. Hana Brown — a Marxist theorist — predicts whites may feel threatened by a large or growing minority population and may think that minorities are reliant on those given resources (Leon Guerrero 2016:71). As a consequence, t divides society along racial lines, and pushes political policies to exploit radicalized tensions, thus hurting people who already suffer from economic, racial, and wealth…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marxism was known as a conflict theory because of the society struggles between the rich and the poor. He believed there to be a way to construct an equal society, and getting the best out of everyone. The opposite of of the system Marx was aiming for was capitalism. Capitalism is the society we live in today, where corporations are owned by the owners. Therefore, capitalism treats people unequally.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In other words, in an exchange, the values differentiate based on the type of product being produce which will require a different level of labor. Karl Marx went further to discussed about social surplus in societies. There are two type of social surplus which are the surplus labor and the surplus value. The surplus labor is unpaid time the worker works to produce things while surplus value is the profit they get from the surplus labor. Overall, capitalism is the means of getting workers that will be pay at the lowest possible cost to produce things which gave them higher profit.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx finds the labor or production aspect of capitalism troublesome and thinks that capitalism is the source and reason of an ill society. Marx insists that with capitalism, the poor will get poorer and the rich will keep getting richer as workers being exploited and dehumanized by capitalists or factory owners. He believed that in such capitalism market, workers would get paid minimal wages since the rich or owners are in higher bargaining position to negotiate wage prices and workers, in order to avoid starving, would have to accept that low wages and work intensively. Marx also fears that workers would be forced to overwork to death and would be alienated from the society and from the human race as they labors multiple hours per day. Marx’s critique of capitalism also associates closely with his labor theory of value.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system. He believed classes existed and there were disparities in society and those inequalities deprived lower classes of materials and resources causing conflict (Krawford, 2009). Mills took it a step further and explained that there is an elite group of powerful individuals in society that occupy positions in bureaucratic organization and large institutions in industrial societies controlling the lower classes (Elwell, 2013). These theories are more key issues as to why happiness for individuals and groups are difficult to achieve. Karl Marx focuses on the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It comes the conflict between the two classes. It suggests that the working class is given a “false consciousness” and that they keep letting themselves be oppressed by the capitalists while the capitalists keep getting richer. It is a technique done by capitalists to avoid revolution from working class. It is done by giving or instilling ideas to the working class that makes them think that they are indeed not oppressed and promoting false consciousness that gives the working class hope. The ruling class are able to this because they control the means of production which gives them the power to control ideas that goes to the working class.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    And all the economic systems have produced social classes, which are divided from top to bottom. Karl Marx believed that such this change is resulted from struggles between dialectical opponents. And those struggles appeared as many different types of form such as war, revolution and democratic reform. Those struggles, in fact, are derived from workers and capitalists; capitalists usually have problems, dealing with workers because the workers tend to be not interested in their jobs. Globalization, a social transformation that provides cheapest labor and resources for capitalists in order to minimize their costs, seemed emerging as a good strategy for capitalists.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics