The Four Perspectives Of Functionalism

Superior Essays
1) Describe each of the four approaches
Functionalism
Functionalism is a macro sociological theory based on society. Functionalism focuses on accepting social inequality and issues that relate to society for example social evils. Functionalism also focuses on why human rights issues exist such as poverty, hunger, slavery and genocide. Although these are negative impacts on society functionalism believes everything that happens in society has a meaning or purpose. For example: individuals see crime as a negative impact on society, but if there was no crime there would be less jobs which lead to unemployment for police, crime investigators etc. Functionalism also have the ability to bring communities together over a purpose or function. Such
…show more content…
Structuralism bases its context for the study of language, identifying structures in cultural and communal systems, explaining that objects and symbols give us as individual’s a certain meaning that we identify that object or symbol to. Emile Durkheim influenced structuralism to its existence in the early 1800’s where other theorists expanded his ideas and studies which are studied as scientifically and objectively as possible. Structuralism has the main idea that the meaning of words derives from the structure of language, not the words or objects they refer to. The main meaning of an object and symbol is created by the different related concepts that language recognizes. Structuralism has two main strengths which include. Firstly, being able to undertake an in-depth study of communication and culture. Secondly evolving from this being able to also study kinship, religions, cultural myths, ideology, and media. Structuralism does not reject any investigation of any other philologists. Structuralisms weakness includes having limited application because it studies, language while lacking the study as a society and social life for an individual. For example, political activity or empowerment. Secondly can only be useful when studying a desired aspect of social structures while rejecting the povitist conception of language. Strengths include …show more content…
This means that it focusses on the lower class making change towards the rich and focusing on the poor rather than the dominant. Marxism is best understood as a philosophy that is applied to society rather than a strict theoretical approach for example functionalism. Marxism generally believes that the dominant class who has the most wealth and power make the social system work for themselves not the majority. For example, the dominant class uses it for their selfish needs and to reinforce their dominant status. Created by ideas that reflected the awareness of the early industrial revolution in the UK and later on Europe. Marxists believe that societies experience struggle due to inequalities like wealth, value and power. Marxism contains different views but have common policies which include. Production is to produce great benefits for a minority at the expense of the exploited majority who are the poorer class. Meaning that it exploits the labour of its employees by paying them wages lesser value than the selling value of the item. If this did not happen the relationship could not function. The working class called the Proletariat produce goods to only benefit the dominant class called the bourgeoisie. This creates an economy which is the base to a social structure, with social forms that are nicknamed superstructure which is learning the normality

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marxism describes the capitalist class, the capitalist control the flow of capital wealth and income, they generally have the power/ ownership of land, factories and banks. “a Marxist term for the working class, whose labour power is exploited by the bourgeoisie” (Chapman 2002, p115). There is seen as a division between upper and lower class caused by Stratification; that society is muti-layered in hierarchal structure resulting in the split between the two classes, creating the conflict by the bourgeoisie, through the proletariat seen to he living in supposed horrible conditions. Which encourages theft along with other crimes for they cannot support themselves. Lacking the bare requirements for living, Proletariats can turn to turn onto drugs and alcohol as a way to cope with the issues such as depression, stress and anger of struggling below the poverty line. There life chances can be decreased as they become less employable to employers as being poor they cannot afford to maintain themselves, such as wash regularly or have clean…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Functionalism is one of three major social theories that focus on a particular part of a social problem. Functionalists think of society as a machine; every part of the society machine has its own function. When everything is running properly in the machine, then there is equilibrium of society. When it comes to functionalism, sometimes parts of society do not work properly. This is referred to as a dysfunction. These dysfunctions can vary in size and importance. If a dysfunction is immense and long lasting, this can create a dilemma for other parts in society. Functionalist concepts can also be defined as beneficial consequences of people’s actions. These functions can either be manifest or latent. Manifest function is an action that is intended to do well within the system while a latent function is a consequence that helps the unintended part of the social system. Functionalism is intended for people to see something and how it is related in other parts of the system.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism also known as Conflict theory is a sociological theory, focusing on the conflict and inequalities within society, and how these factors impact health and illness. Karl Marx was the leading theorist of this sociological perspective, not only was Marx a sociologist he was also an economist, journalist and political theorist. Capitalism is one of the main focuses of this perspective, in that within society the social class that you are a part of will determine your health and wellbeing. According to Germov “Marxism, also known as ‘conflict theory’, asserts that society is dominated by a conflict of interests between two social classes within capitalist societies-the bourgeoisie (the capitalist class) and the proletariat (the working class)”.(Germov,2014).…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism is a theory concerned with the power play between the social classes in society and trying to even out this balance of power. Proponents of Marxism believe that the government and other higher levels of society should be more accountable to the working class people, who in reality keep the world’s wheels turning. Marxism is about empowering the disadvantaged members of society to fight inequality (Kenny, 2006, pp.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism is the theory of class struggle, economics, and materialism in any given society. In every society there must be a ruling class and the oppressed classes, who obviously would have conflicting interests. Marx believed that there were three primary classes the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie,…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism as created by Karl Marx is a society in which the state owns all the land and property. In the Marxist system, No capitalism, Money does not exist and everyone equally gets what they need.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism is a conflict perspective as they believe that there will always be conflict between the working class and the capitalist class, it is also a structural perspective as they look at all of society’s structures such as the education system, the family, the media, religion and the state and see them as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism. The Marxists have identified several functions that allow the family to contribute to capitalism and only see how each of the functions of the family are solely performed for the benefit of the capitalist system.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism mainly talks about two classes: the ruling class (Bourgeoisie) and subject class (Proletariat). The ruling class would take advantage of the subject class and exploits their work to get profit out of their labour (Haralambos, 1990). The subject class are being exploited by the ruling class as they would do all the work and not get much profit out of it. However, the two classes are co-dependent with one another as the Bourgeoisie need the Proletariat because without them there are no products to make profit out of and the Proletariat need the Bourgeoisie because without them they have no wages and won’t be able to survive (Haralambos, 1990). The superstructure within the main institutions in society are the reason why the Bourgeoisie have power as the superstructure act for the needs of the Bourgeoisie, not the Proletariat (Haralambos, 1990). Marxists would believe that class stratification is used most when in capitalist societies because in that type of system only the minority in society (Bourgeoisie) receives the benefits of the exploitation to the rest of society (Haralambos, 1990). The majority are exploited because of false class consciousness. This means that they let this happen as they are not aware that they are being exploited by the bourgeoisie…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism And Social Class

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The revolution that Marx predicted in 1848 did not result in the working class overturning the existing class structure, capitalism. Marxism is the socioeconomic theory that investigates the conflicts and relationship between social classes. Marxism studies the historical developments of western societies. Marxian tradition focuses on the consciousness of a class identity and class interest that navigate society (Porter, 1965, p 17). Class-consciousness is an ideological concept that functions to lead citizens through class conflicts and social change (Porter, 1965, p.17).…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Functionalism is when all things in society have a function or role with in that socially. In a Functionalist perspective everyone is pushed to have common goal such as cultural goals like being rich or having a rank. They have one way to reaching ways of reaching cultural goals called institutionalized means that are approved by socially. A functionalist theory of deviance, strain theory, talks about that if people with in the society follow the cultural goals for success some people fall short of it and instead enter the life of crime and make a new path of innovative means. There is also the one that does not conform with either institutionalized means and innovative means. They enter into nonconformity which they either make their own goals of socially or not follow the goals and want to destroy socially goals. Structure is not just the goals of society, but the social class they are in. In each class there are different types of crime committed. In a low class this people want to get the latest things because they advertised by the media, friends, and school. For these people, it is hard to find a means of obtaining this possession, and the reason is that they have little education background and struggle in school. This is why they look towards gangs and the life of crime because they don’t excel in education. They have to found other means of making a living. In a high class, there are white-collar crime where people are respectable of them…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Functionalist analysis was first introduced by Auguste Comte (1798-1857). Comte drew comparisons from human biology to describe how society functioned. It was concluded that as much as the human body’s organs all needed to be working efficiently for it to function correctly, so did the various parts of society. In the same way a biologist would examine various organs to explain how human life was maintained, a functionalist would examine the various social institutions of society and how they work together, to effectively maintain social order (Haralambos et al., 2013). Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) and Talcott Parsons (1902-1979) continued to develop…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx presented Marxism as a way of understanding class divisions in the world that were based on the emphasis on materialism. Marx proposed a society without money or class divisions, diminishing the idea of materialism and capitalism, instead offering that equality in a society is based on how a society is run. Marx’s claims stemmed from an ideological perspective that individuals are more inclined to their wants instead of their needs, he offers that a society must work in a way where not just one individual but an entire society must give what they can to their state or government and take what they need not what they want. Doing this, Marx argues, will remove class conflict and monetary disparities. Marx idealized a utopia of equality for all, not just a certain few. Marx’s philosophy became a fundamental theory behind many communist governments that developed in the years to follow. As opposed to liberalist perspective Marx argued that “that real freedom is to be found positively in our relations with other people” instead of focusing solely on our individual needs and actions, we must focus on others around us as…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The teachings of Karl Marx and Marxism has always been my favorite theoretical perspective because it has been misunderstood over time. One of the best things about Marxism is that it stressed the importance of social equality and the issues that the system of capitalism created in society. Marx argued that capitalism was hindrance to freedom because only those who have money can really enjoy freedom. The Marxist theory in the simplest perspective is that “Marxism emphasizes the idea that social life is based upon "conflicts of interest". The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009)…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism is an international relations theory that highlights the disconnect between the rich and the poor. Marxist philosophy argue that the world is divided into two groups of people: the proletariat and the…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Structuralism is one of many branches in linguistic that understanding language through identifying and determining the structure and every part of it consist.Therefore, we can understand how these parts relate to each other, and by doing that, according to this school, we ca come to understand language. From structuralism the main key to understanding language is by mastering the grammatical rules and systems of language from scientific view that focus on structure. Structuralism considered language as purely linguistic system, and to learn it we should mastering the grammar term that consist of “Phonology, Morphology, and the last is Syntax”, The next step are mastering every block on a language and learning hot to relate every elements in language.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics