Aristotle And Plato: The Good Life

Superior Essays
University of St. Thomas
Philosophy Department

The Good Life
According to Aristotle and Plato

Heather Abadie
Philosophy 2314
Dr. Oliva

Philosophers and humans over the course of existence have continued to contemplate the meaning of life. While it is important to consider the question “what is the meaning of life” – there is possibly an even greater question – “what does it mean to live a good life?” Is the contemplation and understanding of the meaning of life enough, or is it important to uncover whether or not one is living a life worth living – a good life? Before studying Aristotle and Plato’s philosophical views on what it means to live a good life, I had my own ideas of what the good life looks like – and I felt that there
…show more content…
According to Plato, wisdom is the key to living the good life. By having the wisdom to use virtues, we act as virtuous beings, and live virtuous lives – which is defined as Plato as living a good life. It is by this definition we understand that only a morally good person can be happy, and goodness is a result of the soul functioning properly. But how does a soul function properly? While Plato uses many examples to explain his theory, I find the Allegory of The Cave to be very powerful. Living a life without attempting to gain knowledge may be easy and comfortable, but it is certainly not a life worth living. The humans in the cave were resistant to learning about what existed outside of the cave, and thought the man who came back to tell them about the outside world was crazy. There are two realms, according to Plato: the sensible realm, which is where images of objects, and objects exist (visible things), and there is the intelligible realm, which is where math, concepts, and ideas exist. Plato describes the sensible realm as the realm of belief, and the intelligible realm as the realm of real knowledge, which is far superior to the material

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Susan Wolf, a professor at The University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, wrote Meaning in Life and Why It Matters to try to figure out why one’s life has meaning. She presents three different views to address the question of whether or not someone exhibits a meaningful life. Wolf presents what is called the fulfillment view, the larger-than-oneself view, and the bipartite view, however each view raises a problem that is sufficient enough to say that it does not answer the question presented before. As a result, she creates her own view on the meaning of life and it is called the fitting fulfillment view. It is a fairly sound argument; however, many people have tried to present an argument against it.…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Aristotle, character is defined by what outcomes or results use desire, the different types of actions we are enjoined to or prohibited from taking, and the habits we may be advised to cultivate within ourselves. For instance, we may feel obligated to pursue a life of duty through some sort of service, or we may feel concern for the public. The Greek ethical proposes, “What is good for man?”. Aristotle believes that ‘eudaimonia’, or happiness, is good for man.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Response to Question 1, Section 1: The Meaning of Life: Wolf vs. Taylor Both Richard Taylor and Susan Wolf understand the difficulty of answering the question, “What is the meaning of life?” Taylor begins his “The Meaning of Life” by saying that we do not even understand what the question means to then answer it, and Wolf claims in her own “The Meanings of Lives” that the question is embarrassing to ask because, as Taylor asserts, we really do not understand what is being asked here. Taylor proposes, then, the best way to answer this is to ask what makes for a meaningless life, and perhaps from this comparison, we can find some answers to the original question. Wolf appreciates Taylor’s approach as she also adopts his method, and even though…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to the topic of laws, most of us will readily agree that breaking the laws is unjust. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of if there is ever a time when a law can acceptably be broken. Whereas some are convinced that laws should never be broken, others maintain that there are some instances where laws should be broken. Socrates and Antigone would agree with the statement that disobeying laws is never the answer. Likewise, I have always believed that breaking the laws should be punishable and should never be done.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the good life? Many philosophers believe that they know what a good life is, what it consists of and how the good life can be reached. Lucretius, a Roman philosopher who followed the idea of Epicureanism, believed that simple pleasures and avoiding pain is happiness which leads to the good life opposed to Epictetus, a Greek philosopher who followed the idea of Stoicism, believed that one should never desire or seek pleasure whatsoever. Although Epicureanism may sound similar to Epictetus, the founder of this system of philosophy was actually Epicurus, who was Lucretius' role model. His philosophy "proposed that the ultimate goal of human life was happiness, and that the greatest good was to seek modest pleasures in order to attain a…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When one imagens the idea of a “good life” there are many different things might spring to mind. The Romans and Greeks had different ideas of this “good life” and so do I. The way one thinks about this achieved life can illuminate what values they hold. Romans value consistency. Greeks value the middle line, which is sometimes described as average.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Croesus Ignorance

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wandering in Darkness, Searching for the Light Searching for the Good Life is like wandering through a maze with countless routes: both can provide a false sense of hope at every turn, both can be frustrating and both provide a great sense of fulfillment upon reaching the end. In the same way that there may be setbacks along the path out of the maze, there may also be difficulties in reaching the Good Life. Although we would like to attain the Good Life without difficulties or obstacles, Croesus and C.S. Lewis suggest we may sometimes need to endure hardships in our process of becoming happy and achieving the Good Life.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical theories of both Aristotle and Epictetus, laid out in their books the Nicomachean Ethics and the Enchiridion, respectively, offer humanity insight into the most effective ways to achieve happiness and to exhibit virtue. Aristotle’s approach to happiness is that it must be looked at as the end to a means not as a means to an end. He feels that happiness should be viewed as the highest good within life. Although Epictetus agrees that happiness is the highest attainable good, he believes that the source of humanity’s misery is people’s inability to differentiate between what they can control and what they cannot. While both philosopher’s theories emphasize the importance of happiness and virtue in a person’s life, Epictetus’ view…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main arguments Plato makes is that the soul has the function of “caring for things, ruling and deliberating (Republic, 353d).” He goes on to add that living is also an essential part of the soul. We can conclude from this that a good soul cares, rules, deliberates, and lives well, while a bad soul does none of these…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The present account will discuss Socrates’ responses to Callicles’ position on what it is that makes a person’s life good. First, I will provide a reconstruction of the two arguments made by Socrates. Secondly, I will give a critique on the arguments. The first response given by…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action and choice, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said that the good is that at which all things aim.” As Aristotle makes inquires and deliberates over what is the highest end for the human life, he debates over what constitutes the highest good. Throughout the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that we aim at some end through our pursuits of action, and that those ends are in some way connected at achieving the highest good. Aristotle suggests the possibility of happiness, translated from the Greek word eudaimonia, which refers to a “state of having a good indwelling spirit or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy and prosperous.” For the one who…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers such as Aristotle, The Buddha, and the more modern-day Nel Noddings have all begged the question, “What does it mean to live a good life?” Aristotle’s main view aims at happiness, and focus on the self. The Buddha and Nel Noddings both believe that one should not fully focus on the self, but more on the selfless acts for others. Each of these philosophers has determined their own proper way to lead a good life and I will examine each philosophy through comparison to the eldest, Aristotle. I believe Aristotle’s philosophy to be agreeable, but I feel he is missing certain key components which I will discuss by the end of the essay.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What, according to Aristotle, is the relationship between happiness and virtue? Working to possess and exercise virtue is essential to achieve the highest degree of happiness. Virtuousness is a unique element of happiness in the sense that we can work to control it through our own habituation. This can be compared to the plethora of components that our disposition creates a predetermined outcome for, including the external and physical goods we desire. Aristotle expands on this idea, stating that when happiness, “...comes as a result of virtue and some process of learning or training, [it is] among the most god-like things; for that which is the prize and end of virtue seems to be the best thing in the world, and something godlike and blessed” (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 947).…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Allegory of the Cave, Plato contends that there is a lower and higher level of understanding. We have the capacity to transcend the lower level of understanding and seek the truth only if we escape the darkness. However, humans are often confused of their own limitations to seeking eternal truth. Additionally, Plato believes that ignorance is the greatest evil, and in order to be morally good, one must obtain a clear knowledge of the world. He explains how he “would rather suffer anything than entertain these false notions and live in this miserable manner;” in the darkness (Plato 440).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assignment 5: Long Paper 1 According to Aristotle, the best life to live is a life of pursuing knowledge. Not only pursuing it but understanding it too. Virtue is a very important aspect that one needs to consider when trying to live an all around good life. As a writer named Christine puts it: Like others before him, such as Socrates and Plato, Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who was interested in the best way to live a good life and to cultivate virtue.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays