The Fog Of War Analysis

Improved Essays
The fog of war is a documentary about the life, former experiences and times of Robert S. McNamara, the previous Secretary of Defense under the Kennedy and Johnson organizations. The piece is a blend between authentic footage and a meeting with Robert McNamara by the chief, Errol Morris. While permitting McNamara to recount the story from his point of view, Morris likewise partitions the film into eleven lessons that can be detracted from McNamara's life. What results is an inside take a gander at a standout amongst the most critical and questionable figures of twentieth century American government. The film is likewise a genuine take a gander at the human side of the chiefs that run the United States and how their identities can influence policy and decision making.
In Lesson #1: Empathize with your enemy. McNamara relates the occasions of the Cuban Missile Crisis to show how close we
…show more content…
Kennedy initially offered McNamara the position of Secretary of Treasury, which McNamara turned down. He thusly acknowledged Kennedy's offer for the position as Secretary of Defense.

The film hops to 1963 and McNamara can be heard on tapes conversing with JFK about taking out all U.S. counselors in Vietnam inside of two years. He then talks about the overthrow in South Vietnam that saw its leader killed, making it harder for the U.S. to haul out. He says he never saw JFK more irritated, especially in light of the fact that the U.S. was somewhat in charge of the upset.

The film slices to tapes of Lyndon. B. Johnson conversing with McNamara about how he generally believed JFK's contemplations for hauling out of South Vietnam was absurd, trusting it to be adverse mentally. As the tape proceeds with, McNamara and LBJ differ on the seriousness of the circumstance in South Vietnam. McNamara trusts that if heightening is expected to enhance the falling apart condition, the American individuals should have been instructed on the desperate circumstances of that nation

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Kennedy started this whole “mess” with Vietnam while he was in office. Although he was not able to see how sending troops and advisors over to Vietnam, he made the mistake of starting the sending of troops. Vietnam was a costly war for the United States. Overall more than 58,000 troops were killed in Vietnam and the US did not accomplish its goal, to stop the spread of Communism. Although Kennedy had one of the highest approval…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The pain, passion, and even the conversational simplicity which can be seen in Black Hawk ’s account of American history makes it impossible for a reader to be unable to connect with the story and the all too real sufferings within his autobiography. Throughout this book, Black Hawk offers a fairly accurate description of numerous historical events and battles in which he was involved. However, the information…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kennedy’s approval of the coup and increase in US troops left Johnson with no honorable way to end the Vietnam…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lyndon Johnson was the vice president at the time JFK was shot. Maybe he killed JFK because he knew he would be the new president. Johnson didn’t pull the trigger but maybe he hired somebody else too. Clancy says “Others, including the military industrial complex, a government agency such as the FBI, Southern segregationists, the Soviet Union or American conservatives.” He also had a perfect opportunity because Johnson planned his trip.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even with the victory and mutual relations that war creates, citizens continue to be challenged with the inevitable consequences of war. As Beer and O'Brien retell their encounters with war, both highlight the personal conflicts that arise in the midst of chaos. While under these circumstances, Beer and O'Brien link fear and the detachment from reality with citizens and his/her current…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Stephen Crane’s The Red Badge of Courage and Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried contain some aspects that are both alike and different. The main theme—war—is the same throughout both works of literature. War is also a provoking issue that is making its way into the daily conversations of everyday…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Towards the end of the war, no country had actually launched an attack on one another. In that same way, this reviewer feel the central idea of the book was that the Cold War brought an end to the use of military strength and ability as the perfect definitions of power as perceived five years before the start of Cold War. Gaddis also inspects some of the famous and important people who helped to resolve the war that had changed. Gaddis focuses on the Cuban errors of Nikita Khrushchev which resorted in President Kennedy misinterpreting and almost went to war. Khrushchev slipped rocket-fired weapons into Cuba, mostly as an effort to spread revolution throughout Latin America.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lyndon B Johnson Legacy

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Johnson was unsuccessful every major attempt in foreign policy as a Global leader and Commander in Chief, so he earns a F. He increased the war in Vietnam, but there was no way for him to win. At the beginning of the war, the number of people fighting was raised “from 50,000 to 100,000 or more men and… most of the increment [were] in combat roles” (Barbour 154), but by 1967, there was about “485,000 troops in South Vietnam, almost 16,000 war dead and 100,000 wounded.” The Tet Offensive showed McNamara that there was no possible way for the United States to win the war against the North Vietnamese because the North could still fight very hard with a big offensive making it impossible for the United States to ever win the war. (Bornet…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lbj Osama

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He points out that once the troops are deployed, the ill-equipped troops will begin to suffer immense casualties, which will lead to a war that is impossible to leave. He suggests that striking a treaty an leaving Vietnam may have some short term adverse effects, but America’s overall credibility and prestige will stay intact, as opposed to leaving the was after a huge commitment. He then supplies LBJ with a detailed guide on how to proceed to reduce America’s casualties as much as possible. This includes a small military increase of 15 battalions, or 72’000 troops, and continued bombing of North Vietnam. He then proceeds to advise on how to go about eventually organising a treaty with North Vietnam.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kennedy is talking about the United States needs to establish how powerful they are in Vietnam. “This is not a jungle war, but a struggle for freedom on every front of human activity.” Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964. Johnson talking about Vietnam, that its more then just a war of power. That its for basic freedom of a human.…

    • 2301 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the speech he suggested to the American people to “let us begin.” By alluding to Kennedy’s speech he is able to shift into his own political agenda by stating “let us continue.” Now using the appeal of ethos, he once again uses the technique of anaphora to tell the American people “not to hesitate, not to pause.” Using the credibility of a once loved President, allows for Kennedy’s supporters to also support Johnson. This contrasts to the end of the section where he tells the American people “to act wisely, to act vigorously, to act speedily. . .”…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis Of A Few Good Men

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The two would conclude that the fear and intimidation is a by-product of the military’s system of rank. In their article, Lt. Calley states on the stand post-war that his actions were hardly that of his own.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are copious burdens passed onto each soldier through the hardships of the Vietnam war. These men fighting are young with their whole lives ahead of them, and have to carry these grievances. The stress O’Brien puts on these physical and emotional burdens shows how important it is not to forget what these men fought for and how much they…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to him, what one sees is not always what is there, and certain beliefs he/she holds affect what is to be seen. He continues on to argue that the war with North Vietnam had been the one that is based on “ misunderstanding” between nations. United States saw it as a war against spreading Communism, but North Vietnam saw it as a civil war , and fought United States vigorously because North Vietnam feared United States was there to colonize both South and North Vietnam. As a result thousands of troops lost their lives and both countries suffered economically. McNamara’s lesson matches constructivist’s view that it is important to not only to see but to empathize with the enemy in order to feel and gain deeper understanding of the true driving force of the war, so in the future such was based misunderstanding doesn’t…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Johnson’s “Speech on Vietnam” delivered on September 29th, 1965 at John Hopkins University, he continues Kennedy’s trend of imperialist rhetoric disguised as responsible foreign policy. To start, he argues that South Vietnam’s freedom is in danger of falling under “the deepening shadow of Communist China” ignoring the fact that communism in Vietnam is enacted by the Northern part of Vietnam, and not China (Johnson 1965). The majority of Johnson’s speech draws on imperialist rhetoric, dictating that America has a responsibility to support freedom in a global context, ignoring the very real effects of violence in order to achieve such a valiant claim. In response to the escalating brutalities, Johnson strategically speaks to it from abstract point of view, obscuring the audience’s understanding regarding the amounts of American bodies…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays