Is the phenomenon of interest clearly identified and what is it?
The phenomenon of interest of the study was clearly identified. It is to discover the experience of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The effects of the bombings on the survivors and how some of them dealt with it then and after the bombings. Resilience as quoted in this study is a phenomenon of positive adjustment in the face of adversity (Haase, 2004). Throughout this study the author identified resilience with experiences of the survivors when it comes to their health, cultural aspects, and the reality of living through the bombing. The study explored on the psychological resilience the survivors had, despite living through the hardships and adverse conditions. …show more content…
Because qualitative methods emphasis on the whole of human experience and the meaning qualified by individuals living the experience, these methods encompasses understanding of health beyond traditional measures of remote concepts to include the complexity of the human experience as it is occurring in everyday living or past experiences. The evidence delivered by qualitative studies that consider the exclusive views, concerns, preferences, and beliefs each person brings to a scientific study offers detailed understanding of human experience and the situations in which they occur. Qualitative research, in addition to providing unique perspectives, has the ability to guide nursing practice, contribute to instrument development, and develop nursing theory (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, …show more content…
Trustworthiness describes the credibility and validity of qualitative research. The researcher promotes trustworthiness by using quotes to illustrate the richness of the data and to establish a relationship between the themes identified and the data (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014). For instance, on the theme about “needing more knowledge”, some of the participants’ responses were quoted as follows: “I think that all areas of the healthcare system, including providers and nurses, need education. I definitely think that we could all use education on how it affects the baby and healthcare providers knowing exactly what they’re all giving their patients and what the outcomes will be.” and “I don’t feel like they’re always informed of what kind of complications could happen with their baby after delivery.” This shows the trustworthiness of the study. Credibility is the truth of findings as judged by participants and others within the discipline. For instance, you may find the researcher returning to the participants to share interpretation of findings and query accuracy from the perspective of the persons living the experience (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014). This was seen in this study when four participants completed follow-up semistructured interviews as a form of member-checking that seeks to validate the researchers’ interpretations of the data and choice of themes. According
The phenomenon of interest of the study was clearly identified. It is to discover the experience of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The effects of the bombings on the survivors and how some of them dealt with it then and after the bombings. Resilience as quoted in this study is a phenomenon of positive adjustment in the face of adversity (Haase, 2004). Throughout this study the author identified resilience with experiences of the survivors when it comes to their health, cultural aspects, and the reality of living through the bombing. The study explored on the psychological resilience the survivors had, despite living through the hardships and adverse conditions. …show more content…
Because qualitative methods emphasis on the whole of human experience and the meaning qualified by individuals living the experience, these methods encompasses understanding of health beyond traditional measures of remote concepts to include the complexity of the human experience as it is occurring in everyday living or past experiences. The evidence delivered by qualitative studies that consider the exclusive views, concerns, preferences, and beliefs each person brings to a scientific study offers detailed understanding of human experience and the situations in which they occur. Qualitative research, in addition to providing unique perspectives, has the ability to guide nursing practice, contribute to instrument development, and develop nursing theory (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, …show more content…
Trustworthiness describes the credibility and validity of qualitative research. The researcher promotes trustworthiness by using quotes to illustrate the richness of the data and to establish a relationship between the themes identified and the data (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014). For instance, on the theme about “needing more knowledge”, some of the participants’ responses were quoted as follows: “I think that all areas of the healthcare system, including providers and nurses, need education. I definitely think that we could all use education on how it affects the baby and healthcare providers knowing exactly what they’re all giving their patients and what the outcomes will be.” and “I don’t feel like they’re always informed of what kind of complications could happen with their baby after delivery.” This shows the trustworthiness of the study. Credibility is the truth of findings as judged by participants and others within the discipline. For instance, you may find the researcher returning to the participants to share interpretation of findings and query accuracy from the perspective of the persons living the experience (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014). This was seen in this study when four participants completed follow-up semistructured interviews as a form of member-checking that seeks to validate the researchers’ interpretations of the data and choice of themes. According