The Difference Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

In the 1960s, race relations were in horrible shape in America. There was still segregation and racism was very prominent. People had had enough of the inequality between black and whites, so they decided to take a stand. Thus began the Civil Rights Movement. Many people were involved in this revolutionary movement, but Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X were perhaps the most distinguished leaders at the time. These two men are still recognized today as pioneers for civil rights, but they did not always agree with each other. King and X had different approaches to the issue of segregation and racism in America. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a minister who preached of God and God’s will. As a minister, he clearly wanted all protesters to take a nonviolent approach. This made him very different than Malcolm X. If a civil rights protester was attacked during a protest, King encouraged that they do not fight back. He knew that violence was not the solution to the problem. Throughout his years, he stuck to this notion. Though the problem was severe, he never once turned to …show more content…
Though X did not have really have demonstrations a marches, his actions were meant with oppressors. People did not like his stance on violence in the movement. They thought that violence would not solve the problem; it almost never does. Of course, many white people hated Malcolm X. He was unafraid to admit that he believed that white people are the source of all racial problems. This surely outraged many. Both Malcolm x and Martin Luther King, Jr. were influential civil rights activist who spoke out about the problem often. Neither were afraid to stand up for their beliefs. They knew they would face many opposers but it was nothing compared to the other obstacles they faced. The pain of inequality needed to be put to an end, and though their methods were different, King and X worked to finish it once and for