The Importance Of Credibility In The Courtroom

Great Essays
The credibility of a person is one of the most important factors to determine whether that person should or should not be allowed to take the stand in the courtroom. Being able to rely on the answers given by a witness or the accused is vital to lawyers or paralegals as those answers could be what helps their client be released from their charges. However, if a person becomes discredited while on the stand, then your client may not have a chance of being released. A person’s credibility must be unimpeachable in order for their statements and testimonies to be considered in a court of law. Determining credibility depends on the witness’ or the accused’s mental and physical state, previous criminal conduct, and the consistency of statements. Mental and physical stability is an important factor to consider when deciding if a witness or the accused should be allowed to take the stand in court. If a mental or physical disability is found, then the witness or accused could easily become discredited based on belief that their disability may have somehow affected their statements or testimonies. In the case of R. v. Tomlinson, the Crown’s witness to a first degree murder, whose name was concealed to protect their identity, was found to be …show more content…
However, the Crown may sometimes cross that line in the hopes of them being able to get a criminal off the streets, which equals a win for them. The Crown’s impartiality has to remain intact if the accused has been convicted of a crime in the past as their previous convictions do not necessarily affect the truthfulness of the testimony that they are giving in regards to the current case. The same train of thought should be applied to witnesses. When it comes to the defendant, prior convictions do not mean that the defendant is guilty for the crime they are currently accused

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rule 404 Case Study

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Prosecution will rely on the statement that is the truth upon the matters…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Eyewitness misidentification is the most common cause of wrongful convictions, accounting for at least seventy-two percent of convictions overturned through DNA testing (The Innocence Project). This being said, eyewitness errors may happen for several reasons, including suggestive police interviewing, an incorrect belief about what the witness saw, and the malleability of confidence (Denov & Campbell, 2005). In this specific case, the malleability of confidence was present. The malleability of confidence refers to how easily influenced the witness is to changing circumstances under stress (Denov & Campbell, 2005). This was evident when Mrs. Roy changed the physical features of the perpetrator to fit Phillion 's description due to the stress of having to choose someone to convict.…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virginia Cooper Summary

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the research study conducted by Virginia G. Cooper and Patricia A. Zapf, they are looking to come up with potential accurate diagnosis guidelines for declaring if someone is competent or incompetent when coming to their ability to stand trial. This is something they are evaluating, because there are many individuals each year sent for “competency evaluations” and there are no procedures set up from ”the courts for making a competency evaluation” (424). They are hoping to find out what factors reliably determine competency. Cooper and Zapf are specifically looking for potential prejudices of “clinicians” rulings of “468 criminal defendants” from “Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility in 1994 to 1997” on their “competency” by analyzing the…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mr. Moreno Case Summary

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Test and Dot Counting Test) on which he obtained scores indicating he was not feigning memory impairment or exhibiting motivational difficulties, which lends to the validity of the testing results and information disclosed during the clinical interview. There does not appear to be a cause for concern for Mr. Moreno’s learning or memory abilities at this time. Mr. Moreno was administered the WTAR. Mr. Moreno’s cognitive outcomes were stable and average in performance. The estimate of Mr. Moreno’s premorbid Full-Scale IQ was 84 plus or minus 15 points or likely falling in the Low Average Range in the 14-percentile range.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A loved one, killed. This is many people’s worst nightmare. The loved ones of the mentally ill are in constant worry of this, knowing that the person they love could suffer from a sudden psychotic breakdown and put their lives at risk without realizing it. The fact that the mentally ill cannot control themselves and may engage in criminal activity as a result has led a struggle for police departments as people who are unaware of their actions - essentially innocent people - are killed. Through an effective argument that utilizes multiple appeals, Pete Earley suggests the necessity of special police forces to handle mentally ill suspects.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is essential to a trials proceedings as witnesses are theoretically…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, Andre Thomas viciously attacked and killed his ex-wife and her two children, and was sentenced to death row. His defense argued that he was not eligible for death row because of his mental state. The court ignored the argument and passed it off, saying that they were using his illness as an excuse to “get out of” maximum punishment. As demonstrated in this case, mental illness is not given the attention it deserves when determining a sentence. Cases such as these have aroused concern how fair the criminal court is towards the mentally ill.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rights Case Study

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The issue in this case is whether Tony Love, our client, has the necessary mental ability to waive his Miranda rights voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently due to the extent of the circumstances involved. An officer must recite the Miranda rights after a suspect has been arrested and before the suspect, or anyone that is of interest to the case, is questioned. State v. Echols, 382 S.W.3d 266, 280 (Tenn. 2012) (citing Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966)). The Miranda rights present that a suspect “has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kiara Rivas Philosophy 25 Due Date: 5/6/2015 Mock Trial: U.S v. Dominique Stephens The case I am presenting today is about a woman who admits to having killed her husband and is being charged with first degree murder. The woman’s name is Dominque Stephens and Mrs. Stephens claims that she has acted in self-defense after suffering many years of domestic violence in her marriage.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the legal standard to determine if a defendant is competent to stand trial? Competency to stand trial (CST) came about to light in the U.S. Supreme Court case Dusky v. United State which established that in order for a defendant to be tried that they have must have sufficient present ability to consult with their lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and factual understanding of the proceedings against him (Dusky v. United States, 1960). Kruh and Grisso (2009) provide analysis of some of the terms that were used in the Dusky test: • Sufficient ability and reasonable understanding specify that CST does not require complete and fully unimpaired functioning, whereas reasonable implies to relativity to the context…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without full information an attorney cannot do their job in full. Evidence: Eye witness identification: Eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing. While eyewitness testimony can be persuasive evidence before a judge or jury, 30 years of strong…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Jurors

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A jury is a group of citizens, normally consisting of between 4-15 jurors who are randomly selected and are accordingly given the ability to make decisions in a legal case submitted to them to pass on a verdict. A juror is an individual citizen part of the jury. Jurors are normally made to attend to hear cases in the Coroner, District and Supreme Courts. They must settle on the facts before them and determine civil or criminal matters. They are the lone judges of the validity of the witnesses and their obligations are as critical as those of a judge.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Inferences

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is human nature for individuals to desire a response from others when confronted with an adverse situation, humans want to know if someone did something or if they did not (Greenfield, 2013). This requires a response of admitting to the situation or denying it. In the courtroom the jurors are the ones seeking this response, consequently, the jurors are human. The inferences they may draw from the defendant’s refusal to testify could lead them to believe right away they are guilty of something. The defense counsel may give instructions to the jury stating the defendant’s silence should not be considered an inference of guilt.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our current legal systems leads to wrongful conviction, which is a terrible injustice. The legal system does not come to the knowledge of many until a innocent person spends years in prison. There is a rising number of exonerations due to DNA. However, the growth of exonerations is causing more awareness about injustices in our legal system. In many minds there is rise of doubts now about the accuracy of the criminal justice system.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brenton Butler Case Study

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a study done by Steven D. Penrod and Brian L. Cutler, eyewitness identification was tested to find the most reliable effects on eyewitness performance. The studies that they performed indicated that jurors ' evaluations of identification evidence are heavily influenced by the confidence of the eyewitness. Unfortunately, in this case and in many other cases, the confidence of the eyewitness did not matter because he still identified the wrong man. The correlation between confidence and accurate eyewitness identification is weak (Penrod & Cutler, 1989). Because the victim’s husband was so confident in his identification, the cops did not feel obligated to find all of the evidence that they needed to prosecute Brenton.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays