The Pardoner does not deny his perversion unlike the Friar and the Summoner who refuse to admit their avarice. Both characters become angry and highly insulted; revealing their cognitive dissonance to the harsh reality of their works. The Pardoner, however, seems to be proud and boastful in his “slandering falsehood” (33); he applauds himself to have the ability to trick the naive. The Pardoner believes to be superior due to the influence he has gained through the Church. Power and his “principle intent, covetousness,” (50-51) has completely corroded him, and for this reason, he is the worst of the three: the only thing worse than a decadent church official is a one who flaunts his
The Pardoner does not deny his perversion unlike the Friar and the Summoner who refuse to admit their avarice. Both characters become angry and highly insulted; revealing their cognitive dissonance to the harsh reality of their works. The Pardoner, however, seems to be proud and boastful in his “slandering falsehood” (33); he applauds himself to have the ability to trick the naive. The Pardoner believes to be superior due to the influence he has gained through the Church. Power and his “principle intent, covetousness,” (50-51) has completely corroded him, and for this reason, he is the worst of the three: the only thing worse than a decadent church official is a one who flaunts his