The Chernobyl Nuclear Meltdown

Improved Essays
Hello name’s Cameron, Cameron sydnor and I used to work at a nuclear facility . The chernobyl nuclear disaster was a terrible event, yet very few people actually know the backstory of the plant. Despite the story being fairly interesting.
For example did you before the meltdown the leader of the facility once said “the chance of a full scale meltdown is one in a million” clearly this man cannot see the future or else he would have said (scream this) “OH NO THE PLANT IS GOING DOWN WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE EVACUATE EVACUATE!!!!!!!!!”
The story starts in 1970 when the plant starts its construction along with the neighboring town of pripyat. The plant ,just to tell you now I am going to say that word a lot, did not become fully operational until

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Chernobyl disaster (1986) was probably the worst possible accident in a nuclear power plant. It was the biggest catastrophe ever happened since the beginning of operating nuclear power stations. It started by a total meltdown of the reactor core. The explosion and the consequent reactor fire, burning for 10 days, resulted in a vast emission of radioactive material, early deaths of 31 persons and adverse consequences for the public and the environment [198]. This Chernobyl disaster provided many invaluable lessons.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    TMIncident The three Mile Island incident was a horrific accident that started on March 28, 1979 when unit 2 partially melted down. This occurrence that has been dealt with numerous times started a chain reaction of incidents. After the turbine had shut down and radioactive fluids started overflowing the release valves were opened and coolant waters were rushed in. This coolant water cooled the turbines but then was exposed to the radiation. Now there had already been a couple technical errors that occurred leading up to this so the workers there could not get a lucky bounce this day.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The three mile island mishap for 1979 might have been the Most exceedingly bad atomic force plant catastrophe in the united states. It happened at once At atomic force safety might have been being referred to and At those notice of the expression atomic brought around musings for war. Also, it brought those defeat for atomic force as An heading adrift force asset. The hugeness it needed ahead networking historical backdrop might have been it demonstrated kin how near home the peril might have been What's more it offered a sight with outcasts around how neighborhood occupants bring existed Previously, dread of three mile island.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people who live in Richmond don’t want to agree on constructing a nuclear power plant because of they are frightened that it’s going to explode and cause a lot of damage. In March 1979, an accident occur in The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania which allowed a small leakage of radiation surround the atmosphere. Many people would fear that it can harm their health, but in Document A it states that “the leak had no demonstrable effect on the health of anyone at the plant or in the surrounding area.” In other words, the small leakage didn't put anyones health and the environments’ in danger. By this, we know that building a nuclear power has more pros than cons, and that there is nothing to worry about.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three Mile Island Accident Introduction Radioactive reactants are one of the leading source of electricity in our country thus making it very important to us. Radioactive compounds that are used to run the nuclear reactor's turbines by heating water into steam which run generators to produce electricity though are a dangerous hazard to us. There have been many nuclear plants accidents in our country, but the Three Mile Island accident is one of the most significant regarding hazard management ("How does a nuclear reaction take place?," n.d.) The purpose of this paper is to us to evaluate the Three Mile Island incident and conclude on why it's significant in our line of hazard management.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Accident at Three Mile Island I’m going to tell you about the nuclear accident at Three Mile Island. On March 28, 1979, the power plant built near Middletown, PA partially melted down. Still today it is the most serious accident in U.S. nuclear power plant operating history. The accident is said to have been caused by a combination of equipment malfunctions, design problems, as well as worker errors. (www.NRC.gov/threemileisland)…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1960s and 1970s were times where the ideals of the Paranoid Style were rampant. During this time some of the things people feared were conspiracy within the government and higher ups, the possibility of being spied on, the rise of the second wave of feminism, and the possibility of accidents within our nuclear power plants. In our history class, we have observed these topics through films made at or around the same time these paranoia incidents were clearly present. Through the film The China Syndrome, we will focus on the paranoia surrounding nuclear power plant corporations during the 1970s. This film is accurate about the conspiracies at that time, showing that corporate greed leads to potential hazards, and that relations between companies…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reader is most aware of the downfalls of nuclear power because that is what the media conveys to the public. The Three Mile Island incident is brought up more than once in this article and most people are familiar with this because it made worldwide news in 1979. A small portion of the text is a review, but most of it is new information. One piece of information that caught my eye was the portion that discussed the Obama administration: “President Obama eliminated funding… for the state-of-the-art nuclear waste storage facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada” (Stieglitz and Docksai 17). Nearly all of the statistics were new information.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There were nearly 125,000 people working on the nuclear bomb but only about 50-70 people actually knew they were working on a weapon. A soviet spy named Klaus Fuchs made his way into the group of scientists. Most government officials didn't know about the project. Outside of a research center there was a sign that stated,…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The next morning, people went about their normal business, not thinking much of the event. However, just 36 hours after the accident, the evacuation began. Residents were told to bring enough supplies to last their family three days and to sadly, leave all their pets behind. The cleanup crew (liquidators) consisted of the army, power plant staff, and local police and fire services. They believed that after a quick cleanup they would be able to return everyone home.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why occurred on 26 April 1986 because an operator did something wrong. Most serious of the nuclear accidents. It will be managed by a dome that has s to build will be rolled over the reactor 4. It was initially kept a secret. Blame has been placed on people working in the factory and Most people affected were in the exclusion zone.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    it had something to do with Cuba’ and so I didn’t sleep for days. It was quite frightening” (“Painful History” Par. 10). It was almost impossible for families and parents to remain calm knowing that their loved one’s lives were at risk. In this case it was not just a casual political debate between two superpowers, it was a very dangerous standoff that could have destroyed the world at any second. Americans had different perspectives and reactions to the crisis, especially after Kennedy’s televised broadcast about the blockade (Colman Par. 4).…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fukushima Catastrophe

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The fukushima catastrophe that occured in 2001 demonstrated what happens when a nuclear power plant's saftey system fails. Along with this, the U.S. nuclear industry responded by saying that that will not happen here, but it can and it will eventually. Even if a meltdown doesn't occur, the waste the nuclear power plants produce do some damage to our enviroment. Every waste dump in the U.S. leaks radiation that can travel through the air,ground water, and agricultural consumption which can lead to human ingestion. This waste has no dispoal becasue the only way to dispose of the waste is to manage it for thousands of years until it decays.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Engineers hold the responsibilities to not only innovate new ideas but to do them safely to reduce the chance of error to a small percentage and them some. Engineers must keep in mind the well being of the workers and public who may reside nearby the engineer must be ethical and must follow the laws and use his skills to do things both efficiently and safely. Many of these factors were disregarded in the design, construction and operation of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. The engineers who designed the RMBK-1000 were more concerned with cost and the production of more energy and they neglected safety. They violated Ontario’s code of ethics of a professional engineer and in doings so endangered many lives.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Reactor Essay

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The state of energy production throughout the globe is experiencing the concern of availability and access to resources that aid in the production of needed energy, but also reducing the presence and production of carbon dioxide emissions. What is typically understood among nations invested in nuclear energy is that such technology is largely free of carbon dioxide emissions at the source of production- a favorable avenue in context to fossil fuel utilization, but is historically rot with extreme development and management concerns. Repurposing the fundamental concept of nuclear technology, through aggressive research and development in the form of liquid fluoride thorium reactors, the nuclear energy produced from this form will provide the…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays