The Supreme Court Case Of Marbury V. Madison

Improved Essays
Marbury v. Madison

In November 1800 John Adams, President of the United States lost the election to Thomas Jefferson (65 to 39) . He also lost the control of Congress. Adams was a Federalist and Jefferson was Republican. They both believed that victory by the other person will be a disaster for the nation. As one of his last acts, Adams convinced the Congress to pass a new law which will grant him the power to appoint new judges. Three of the new justices of peace could not been appointed because Adam’s office ended and his secretary failed to deliver the official documents. One of these judges was William Marbury. When Jefferson found out that Adams is trying to fill the courts with Federalist judges he asked his Secretary of State, James
…show more content…
This is called judicial review. If a law violates the terms of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has the right to invalidate that law. Because of the judicial review the Supreme Court plays an important role in the well-functioning of the law system. It prevents the different sectors of government to abuse their power. According to these facts the U.S. Supreme Court has the ability to exercise judicial review of legislative acts and declare them …show more content…
Madison there is a hierarchy between the Constitution and federal legislative acts. Constitution should always be above the federal legislative acts.

The main arguments used by the Supreme Court were that if the court issued the writ of mandamus it would not matter anyway because they had no power to enforce it with the result that president Jefferson could just easily neglect it. Another argument was that if the Supreme Court refused to issue the writ then it would mean that they backed down before Jefferson. The final reason was that the Supreme Court declared the law of Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional because it granted too much power to the court above the Constitution.

The final decision of the case showed that Jefferson’s secretary, James Madison had no right to prevent William Marbury from taking his office as a justice of peace. But on the other hand the Supreme Court has no power to force Jefferson and his secretary to let Marbury take his position because they would ignore what the court says. The law upon which Marbury’s claim was based on was declared by Chief Justice John Marshall unconstitutional . So after all that happened William Marbury could not become a justice of peace of the district

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Marbury then applied to the court for a writ of mandamus. The court then ordered Madison to show why the writ should not be issued. The case proceeded after showing no cause. As the court view the case, they had to consider the following questions and then the decision would be made. The first question was “Has the applicant a right to the commission he demands?” The second was that “if he has a right, and that right has been violated, do the laws of his country afford him a remedy?” And the last was “If they do afford him a remedy?” The answer to the first question was “Yes, he has the legal right to the office for the space of five years.” The second answer “Yes, his country can afford him a remedy”. The court rule that Jefferson was wrong for preventing Marbury to take office, but the court also wasn’t able to give him the mandamus, simply because they didn’t know the extent of their power. So the final answer was the most important, the final answer was, “Yes he is entitled to the remedy, but why does he need it, and does the court really have the power to give him the writ. This question proposed conflict between Article 3 of the constitution and the Jud. Act of…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1786 the federal government realized that America would not survive with the articles of confederation (“Articles of Confederation”). In the summer of 1787, 55 men gathered to amend the Articles of Confederation (“Constitution”). The Constitution had to have compromise for it to pass(“Constitution”). One of those compromises was the Bill of Rights (“Constitution”). There were two sides the federalist and the anti-federalist (“Constitution”). The federalists thought the Constitution did not need a Bill of Rights because they thought citizens rights were already stated in the Constitution (“Constitution”). The anti federalist wanted a Bill Rights because they thought that the government would try and violate our rights. James Madison saw this…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury versus Madison is considered the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court. The case took place around from 1789 and lasted until 1803. The constitution called for three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judiciary. Articles I and II covered legislative and executive. Article III covered judiciary. With everything else almost finished in the Constitution, the meaning for Article III was left open for interpretation. In 1789, Congress passed the Judiciary Act, which established the federal court system, but did not specify the number of justices. Although the early chief justices didn’t have a huge impact in the direction…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case started when John Adams had lost presidency seat to his vice president, Thomas Jefferson. Once Adams, was defeated by Jefferson, Congress immediately passed a new judiciary act that included many new positions, including forty five justice-of-the peace. Chief of Justice John Marshall held the responsibility of getting the commissions signed for what was called “midnight justices” to take office. (Hudson) Chief of Justice John Marshall did not have time to deliver all the commissions before Thomas Jefferson took office in the White House. At that time Seventeen justice of peace did not receive their commission, among those seventeen was William Marbury. Marbury was furious at the fact that he did not receive his commission and decided to sue the secretary of state, James Madison. Marbury requested that the court issue a writ of mandamus, which would force Madison deliver his…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case started with the petition filed to the supreme Court on February 11, 1803 by William Marbury. William Marbury had been appointed justice of Peace in the district of Columbia by the president John Adams but whose commission was not later delivered. Marbury petitioned the Supreme court to force the new secretary of State, James Madison, to deliver the remaining documents. Marbury sought mandamus in the supreme court, requiring James Madison to deliver his commission, through this commission Marbury was to be appointed as justice of the peace for Washington County in the District of Columbia. However, it was ruled that Court had no jurisdiction to force the new president Jefferson and Madison to seat Marbury. In writing the decision, John Marshall (Chief justice) argued that acts of congress in line with the…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall’s argument for the ability to have judicial review is considered to be one of, if not the most important documents in judicial history. Marbury vs. Madison was the first important case that was during Marshall’s jurisdiction. The argument that John Marshall has put forth is a worthy one and it should be stated that initially only 11 of the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention wanted the ability to have judicial review. Even with this being stated, I agree with John Marshall doctrine. Every five years there is an election for the Justice of Peace, and this is one of the main topics of this case. John Adams appoints Marbury and the seal of the United States are placed upon it, nevertheless this item never reaches Marbury…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall Dbq

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When John Adams appointed Federalists to various judicial positions before his term ended, James Madison discarded 17 commissions for justice of the peace, rather than delivering them to the men appointed. Though many of the men did not care about this position, Marbury filed a suit in the Supreme Court, demanding the order of the commission. John Marshall ruled that Marbury had a right to the commission. However, during this ruling, John Marshall declared an act of Congress to be unconstitutional. Marshall said that this law, the Judiciary Act of 1789, could not be used because it authorized an action which the constitution did not allow. As a result, the Supreme Court became the final arbiter of what Congress, the Executive Branch,…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1803 William Marbury sued John Madison for being denied the role of Justice of Peace and claimed that the executive branch was forcing actions on the other branches. Before Thomas Jefferson was elected into his role of Presidency, William Marbury had been appointed to be a Justice of Peace by John Adams, but the appointment process had not fully been completed. By that time Jefferson had been in his role of Presidency and Adam's role was terminated. Thomas Jefferson had then denied Marbury access to his role appointed by the previous President, even though William had been expecting a role. William Marbury brought the case to the Supreme Court, stating that not one branch of the government was allowed to force an action upon another branch.Thomas…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Realizing that he would not be receiving his position as justice of the peace, William Marbury went to the Supreme Court and tried to obtain his commission. He told the Court to order Madison to give him his job. The Supreme Court had the power to issue such an order because of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which created the judicial branch of the federal government. The act provided the number of members of the Supreme Court, the number of lower districts, it introduced the idea that the Supreme Court can settle disputes between states, and the idea that a decision made by the Court is absolutely final.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was one of the most important cases in American history because it gave the supreme court the right they’re known for, declaring if a law is constitutional or not. When John Adams’ presidency was coming to an end, he realized how the Federalist party was also coming to an end. To leave a legacy, he made his friend John Marshall the Chief Justice the Judiciary Act of 1801. The Judiciary act of 1801 made 16 new federal judgeships, which were all appointed by President John Adams. When Jefferson became President, he realized that the Judicial branch was full of people who had different views than he did, and most of America. He decided to repeal the Judiciary act of 1801, but it led to a controversy because the constitution said…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1803, Marbury v. Madison was sent to court and the long trial began. Many events had been leading up to the case that would change the United States government forever. Marbury v. Madison proved to be no ordinary case when it increased the powers of the judicial branch. The continuing expansion of the government forced the existence of the case to be debated. It was only a matter of time before the branches would increase in power. The United States’ population had multiplied for many years; and as more people migrated to the U.S., the power that was derived from the citizens influenced the inflation of the government. Marbury v. Madison first paved the way to allow the judicial branch to have a true influence on this government. The events that lead to the hearing and how the case preceded directly affected how the verdict would influence the judicial branch’s powers.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, the Supreme Court needs to be able to decided whether laws are constitutional or not, because we need a part of the government to do that specific job. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution states that the “Constitution, … , shall be the supreme law of the land” (Doc. G), and it is the basis that our government and country were based upon. No law should able to violate the Constitution therefore we need someone to decide what is constitutional and what isn’t. No legislative act or law can go against the Constitution, and if it does it is not a legitimate law (Doc. C).…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3. John Marshalls final decision in the case of Marbury V. Madison greatly strengthened the judicial branch, because the final ruling in the case established the…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison in 1803. This was the first case in which the Supreme Court declared a federal law unconstitutional. The case involved the appointment of William Marbury, Maryland Federalist and prominent land speculator, as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia. Unfortunately, Marbury’s letter of appointment signed by President Adams two days before he left office, was undelivered by Madison. Madison, who was directed to withhold the letter of appointment from Marbury by the ensuing President, Thomas Jefferson (Shi &Tindall, 2013, P.331,…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Presidential election of 1800 President John Adams lost his reelection bid to Vice President. Adams being a staunch Federalist opposed the political beliefs Jefferson, who was a Republican. With Jefferson becoming President, Adams feared that his Federalist party would lose ground in the in the government, and the Republican would give power to the states. To prevent this Adams and his Federalist Congress decided to increase the number of Judicial positions inside the inside the Judicial Branch.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays