Hedonistic Knowledge Tok Analysis

Good Essays
A society is defined by a standardized ideal, and it is kept stable by an indoctrinated idiosyncrasy. The communal aura adulterates any provincial perception, which then creates a widely accepted ideal. Citizens of such society find refuge in conformity, and their ordeal of diversity is assuaged by homogeny. The presence of an analogous, perfunctory civilization obliterates any means of individualist thinking or doing—for the idea of individual intellect has become abominable and obscure. Although the perennial dogma of the disillusioned maverick is what can provide any facet of contrast between their ideas and the surrounding society’s moral values or assumptions. Their provincial conceptualization and obstinate lifestyle are considered characteristics …show more content…
The versatility it possesses becomes the arbiter that decides its relevance to modern society or ideas. John’s archaic foundation of humanitarian knowledge based on the works of Shakespeare collide with the World State society’s hedonistic knowledge based on the works of Ford. The contrast embodied between these two sources of knowledge is profound in that it reveals how rudimentary the homogenous society’s idea of life is in comparison to John’s. His dogmatic beliefs in necessitated tragedy, committed love, and aesthetic art are imperiously challenged by Mustapha Mond’s beliefs in obligatory homogeny, synthetic standards, and universal happiness. In their iconic confrontation toward the end of the novel, John articulates himself eloquently and reasonably; almost transforming all of the Controller’s statements into dubious beliefs substantiated by stagnated comfort as opposed to innovative progression. The desire for misery, tragedy, intimate love, individualism, and art are unknown in the World State society, and John introduces, or rather, reiterates these ideas to Mond. The conflict between them reveals a broad and plausible account of the homogenous society’s foundation and protocol, because Mond articulates himself in adaptation to John’s contentious statements; as opposed to being met with indoctrinated, terse maxims such as, “a gramme is worth more than a damn”. The derisive nature of their conversation divulges the reasons for the eradication of tragedy, love, and art within World State society—thus providing a more intimate and reasonable compensation for the homogeny. Although John’s alienated ideas are equally as valid, Mond reveals the altruistic intentions behind the dystopian society, thus modulating them into a benevolent effort for the preservation of mankind. John’s alienation of his humanitarian and artistic ideas are vital in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Gulliver's Travels, Swift unpacks certain dark aspects of human nature, namely, its innate selfishness. In contrast to modern theorists like Locke, who contend that the pursuit of self-interest will serve the common good, Swift underscores the potential for unleashing the beastliness in human nature, loosening the traditional moral constraints on avarice and ambition. As a commentary on the modern project, Swift introduces the crude and uncontrollably desirous "Yahoos," who, given the opportunity to pursue their self-interests, reveal a complete disregard for others. He employs the "Houyhnhnms" to serve as the rational antithesis to the Yahoos. For Swift, human beings prove a composite mix between the two.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Othello Character Analysis

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages

    So much of the critical discourse regarding Othello and Iago is defined by the impression of the self - the critics' selves, that is. In a mess of questions of good and evil, right and wrong, critical supporters of Iago (T.S. Eliot, Samuel Taylor) characterize themselves as realists, pragmatic, practical, eschewing the supporters of the so-called weaker Othello, who conversely tend to describe themselves as somehow morally elevated, more empathetic. While the study of literature has never been an objective science, these self-serving perspectives effectively remove any objectivity from the criticisms at all. Of course, by writing two characters that both represent a level of cravenness and evil (Othello did, after all, cold bloodedly murder…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mill regards a “person whose desires and impulses are his own [to be an] expression of his own nature” (62), therefore arguing that free choice and individual actions are central to one’s very concept of self. Such everyday revelations do not have the capacity to grow in a tightly regulated environment, in which rampant censorship effectively crushes any cry of dissonance. Likewise, the value in hearing heretical and oppositional opinions are paramount to the refinement of one's own, and may even possibly result in radical societal shifts (Mill…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He believes that without cultural motives such as laws, holiness, and profit, people have a basic human nature to act virtuously. On the contrary Machiavelli believes that humans have little morality and a malevolent nature. He states “for men forget more quickly the death of their father then than the loss of their patrimony.”(Machiavelli 228) this exemplifies his perceived shallowness of the human mind, and their obsession with wealth and possessions, over their emotions. This is exceedingly evident throughout his writings on governing, he implies the vice of the human race citing the need for many laws and regulations to keep the people's perceived malicious intents in check. Machiavelli and Lao-tzu had very different ideas about what it takes to be a successful leader.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Divine mediation is the glue that holds together the morality of Antigone in Sophocles play of the same name, but the divine law of life is not as territorial as Creon’s man-made interventions. The central conflict of Antigone is between this moral divide of man or god and which one accounts for society. From the conflict analysis presented by Professor Francisco J. Gonzalez, Walter Kaufmann’s defense of the essential Greek tragedy in the case of Antigone provides a clearer perspective that both are ideologies stuck in place. Antigone’s conflict in review is predominantly a lost cause to an archaic or faltered world and in this respect, it is only necessary to understand how good intentions always lead to human error. In the spirit of Rene…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For, how could you make people think harder about stuff without blowing it out of proportion? Constantly referencing places that are generally regarded as “good” and completely throwing them ashore, expanding on the idea of totality and governmental superiority to its peoples, and the dehumanizing and unnatural ways that the society functions all expand the reader’s views to the degree that Huxley might have even intended. To some, the grotesque images and ideas expressed in BNW are too unsightly and shouldn’t be explored. Those are the people that Huxley basically warns the readers about. If one isn’t open to expanding knowledge and insight, then they are either deeply religious or they want to control the way the world thinks.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These are basic categories, which he sees as dichotomies, providing the context for social belief and action, such as good/evil and normal/pathological. The the reason/unreason divide. The creation of a gap between the two pole so that dialogue is prevented and therefore limits are born. The transgressions or contestations are what cross over the limits and create sure a stir that the limits are put into question. The transgressions are the trigger that enables the operation where "the world is forced to question itself" and "is made aware of its guilt."…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant talks a considerable measure about the choice and decision; I believe that his hypothesis in actuality limits it. We should just take a gander at the name ‘categorical’ when talking about his Imperative. It accepts no complaints and leaves little space for imagination. On the off chance that to believe that everything is predefined and to take after your fate in the visually impaired desire to accomplish the most elevated joy and freedom, the jolt to activities and reflections will vanish progressively. These are the reasons I incline toward Nietzsche 's slavish revolt in morality.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One principle issue is that utilitarianism, if embraced, legitimizes as ethically suitable things that are unmistakably improper. For instance, utilitarianism can be utilized to legitimize rebuffing a guiltless man or subjugating a group of individuals if such acts create an amplification of outcomes. In any case, these demonstrations are plainly indecent paying little heed to how productive they may be for the best number. For this and different reasons, numerous masterminds have pushed a moment sort of good hypothesis,…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Within that statement, Taylor is saying that there are flaws that can produced from that one dimensional view of morality. This one sided perspective of morality doesn’t allow for the equality of each individual because it is so…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays