These findings were also contested. Tello’s findings concluded that Paracas practiced both intentional natural (Type 2) and artificial mummification (Type 3) types. There is contention amongst archaeologists whether or not the Paracas used artificial mummification. A later study (a nearly 70 year gap) by Vreeland Jr. (1998) suggests that Tello confused decomposition stages with those of burning (Guillén 2004). Now that there is 70 years of development in the scientific community and technology it is likely Paracas did not practice artificial preservation. The vast Inca civilization (1438-1533) also incorporated mummification in their culture. In his writings of life in Cusco, Garcilaso de la Vega ([1609], 1987) notes how Inca mummies were in the “perfect state of preservation”. The Inca practiced both spontaneous and anthropogenic mummification. It is a common misconception that only Inca
These findings were also contested. Tello’s findings concluded that Paracas practiced both intentional natural (Type 2) and artificial mummification (Type 3) types. There is contention amongst archaeologists whether or not the Paracas used artificial mummification. A later study (a nearly 70 year gap) by Vreeland Jr. (1998) suggests that Tello confused decomposition stages with those of burning (Guillén 2004). Now that there is 70 years of development in the scientific community and technology it is likely Paracas did not practice artificial preservation. The vast Inca civilization (1438-1533) also incorporated mummification in their culture. In his writings of life in Cusco, Garcilaso de la Vega ([1609], 1987) notes how Inca mummies were in the “perfect state of preservation”. The Inca practiced both spontaneous and anthropogenic mummification. It is a common misconception that only Inca