Stuart Mill Conformity

Improved Essays
In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill details his philosophy, concerning the political and societal role of the individual within a democratic society. John Stuart Mill's philosophy centers on discovering the balance between liberty and authority; although Mill believes that government is necessary to foster and regulate democracy, he is apprehensive of instances in which the government infringes upon the civil liberties of the individual. Respecting the sovereignty and autonomy of the individual is of the utmost importance to Mill, and the successful progression of society. In On Liberty, Mill warns of the main threat to individuality, social tyranny, and emphasizes the importance of nonconformity to the preservation of the individual.
John Stuart
…show more content…
John Stuart Mill disapproves of individuals who complacently allow external influences to mold their opinions, desires, and life goals. Mill emphasizes this disapproval by stating, "He who lets the world…choose his plan of life for him has no…other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation" (Mill 56). Imitation is the equivalent of conformity, a practice that detracts from a truly democratic society. The tone of disdain, with which Mill regards blind conformity, is apparent throughout the text. Mill praises the traits of firmness, self-control, and deliberation—traits that present themselves in individuals who recognize their sovereignty and take full advantage of their faculties. Mill's philosophy attempts to enlighten the individual of their autonomy and the capability they have to affect change within their society. According to Mill, as the individual recognizes his sovereignty, he increases his self-worth, and subsequently, his societal value. Mill compares human nature to a tree that grows and develops due to the will of its inward forces—as opposed to a society-created machine, programmed by its manufacturers to complete one, monotonous, unexceptional task for all of its lifetime (Mill 56, 57). The entity of the individual is imperative to the progress of society in that, individual thought challenges society to recognize, and reflect, the diversity of its people. Furthermore, individuals contribute more to society when they are free to offer personal or controversial ideas, without fear of repercussion or restraint. Society ultimately benefits and improves from nonconformity and the facilitation of an absolute freedom of opinion; Mill supports this conclusion by stating that, "Genius can only breathe in an atmosphere of freedom" (Mill 62). Mill denounces a government and society that disregards the uniqueness of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1776-1800 Dbq Essay

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The newly created United States government upholded the Revolutionary principles from 1776 to 1800 by creating the basic law and order of our government in current time. The United States government in the period 1776-1800 relied on Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, and George Washington to produce the foundation of the new American government. Successfully, the five writers developed important reference documents that Americans still use today for freedoms and rights. In document one, John Locke, an enlightenment thinker, writes in his “Second Treatise on Government” that a man will allow himself give up his rights and subject himself to the dominion and control of an other power of government. This statement implies that man is only interested in his own self, his own liberty, and his own property.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He believes that tyranny of the majority may allow society to infringe on individual freedom will lead to conformity and oppresses and threatens an individual’s freedom, helping it to promote social censorship. For example, Mill stated that tyranny of the majority is more horrible than political oppression because it will affect and permeate people’s lives more, (Mill, Pg. 4) This shows that regular people such as family, friends, colleagues, and classmates will have more of a direct impact on an individual than people at the political or national level, showing that it is not the government or society that needs to be in check, but the other individuals or group of people that are harming the individual. Mill explains that people who wants freedom from social tyranny has to resist social conformity and moral behaviors that does not fit with their ideals, beliefs, or lifestyles, in which society at this point is a tyrant that enslaves the soul. Protection must be made on the basis of principle and can only stop if the individual do harm to society…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny of the majority is also a topic discussed throughout class thus far. In the tyranny of the majority, the government serves the people and majority rules. By having a majority rules system, the majority is prevented from being a dictator. Mill believes that you can never be sure you are preventing bad things from happening as you can never be sure that something will go wrong. He believes that the majority will not take away the rights of every one else if they are enlightened.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As long as the human race, the systems that govern it, and the ideas produced by it have evolved over time, so has the ideas of liberty and freedom. Intelligent minds continue to debate the topic, and great philosophers of different ages did the same. Take Niccolo Machiavelli, an atheist man whom used satire to criticize the structure of the Republic of Florence in the Italian Renaissance. Machiavelli stood as one who believed that government stood as the mechanism to ensure liberty in some capacity through the involvement of a republic’s people in creating and obeying such a government. For another view, turn to John Locke; a devout Christian and Enlightenment thinker known as the “Father of Liberalism.”…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill saw the problem with modern society as resulting from the power of both the tyranny of the majority but also the tyranny of public opinion. He believed that public opinion had grown too strong to the point where “At present individuals are lost in the crowd. In politics it is almost a triviality to say that public opinion now rules the world.” (On Liberty, chapter III). The “lost in the crowd” metaphor is a powerful one that illustrates Mill’s view.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, both were advocates for individual freedom, and liberty through democracy. Mill and Tocqueville both feared tyranny, and promoted democracy so that citizens could have individual liberties, and thoughts. Mill’s ideal citizen in a democracy would be participatory, and opinionated in their beliefs. His citizen would not curtail any other citizen’s belief, no matter how far off of their beliefs it is. Tocqueville’s ideal citizen would be one who participates at a local level of politics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many individuals believe liberty is tied to democracy, and political choice is extremely important to Mill. Mill believes that the best form of government is Representative Government. In Representative Government, an individual has the ability to protect himself and his views. As Mill says, “Let a person have nothing to do for his country, and he will not care for it.” Meaning that if you do not let an individual have a choice, then he will have no motivation to be productive for society as a whole.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In order to guarantee the loyalty of its members, the law should also appropriately protect the individual freedom of its people. In regards to Mill, it appears that he somewhat agrees with Rousseau’s argument of the function of government. Mill argues for a representative democracy that would facilitate the development and evolution of liberty for its members. He believed that a representative democracy would only represent the interests of its people and would therefore lessen the resistance between the ruler and its people. Mill…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The criterion of right and wrong controversy has yet to be concluded though many years of argumentation have ensued. Mill attempts to explain the criterion of right and wrong using the concept of utilitarianism. Utility is not something that should be contrasted with pleasure, but rather pleasure itself with the freedom of pain. The criterion of right and wrongness is introduced for utility as the actions are right in proportion if they promote happiness and are wrong in proportion if they produced the reverse of happiness. Happiness is defined by pleasure and the absence of pain and unhappiness is vice versa.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “On Liberty” JS Mill suggests that conformity hurts both individuals and the societies they live in. He argues that it leads to an ineffective political rule because when a majority public opinion is formed, any nonconformist ideology or person is cast aside and loses its influence to change the society it is a part of, even if that influence might be beneficial. This thought can also be applied to our government today. In our case there is not one majority but a bi-polar spectrum that has stayed consistent for over 100 years, and the social pressure is to identify with one party or the other. Mill argues that when social pressure is upheld strongly by a particular society, those who try to shift the norm can be seen as “wild” or…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays