Stanley Milgram's Experiment

Improved Essays
Milgram’s Experiment
How far are people being able to go under pressure orders of an authority? Stanley Milgram had an interest in understanding why Germans had committed war crimes during World War 2. He planned his experiment in the early 1960’s where he had a confederate and the participant, influence of punishment on memory and experimenter orders teacher to obey. Milgram goals was to determine whether the reason many of the accused German gave to clarify their action where they believed they had to follow orders. In the Milgram’s experiment, he had included a lab-coated experiment telling the participant to administer to increase the electric shocks to test subject when they were answered wrong. Throughout his experiment the participant

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is a largely simplistic view of the results of the experiments. The participants did not simply obey the person of authority named the experimenter. As demonstrated in the extensive video footage of the experiments, many of them exhibited great distress and tension, attempted to refuse participation, and tried to reason with the experimenter (Milgram, 1962). While it can be argued that a reasonable person could simply exit the room to leave or to check on the other participant receiving the shocks, the situation prevented this action, not physically, but psychologically. In turn, it may be argued that rather than obedience to orders, the participants of this study succumbed to incessant…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1 The Milgram study was done with the objection of finding out whether obedience for from an authoritative figure was a common occurrence, for example, the killing of Jews by Nazis. Therefore, how long were subjects willing to inflict pin on another person when asked to, despite knowing the seriousness of the injuries. From the experiment, the experimenter established routine through the use of the predefined prods such as ‘please go on and please continue (Myers & Twenge, 2017).’ That way the subject would know what to do when they would hear these words.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the articles “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” and “Review of Stanly Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience,” authors Theodore Dalrymple and Diana Baumrind describe the aspects of the Stanley Milgram experiment, while they both partake different topics to discuss. Dalrymple, a British physician, claims that there is a difference between blind obedience and blind disobedience, and there should be a healthy balance between the two (Dalrymple 119). However, Baumrind believes that the subjects should have been treated in a more enhanced way; therefore, claiming that the experiment unsuitably took advantage of the inherent trust and obedience given by the subject when volunteering to participate (Baumrind 89). These two articles are relevant to…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although they fully had the ability to stop inflicting harm on the learner despite the requests of the experimenter, many of the participants, across the various experiments with differing circumstances, demonstrated a willingness to go to the full 450 volts regardless of the protests of the learner. In the 1963 Milgram experiment, over two-thirds of the participants reached the full 450 volts, with all of the participants reaching 300 volts. Therefore, the experiment concluded with the fact that ordinary people are fully capable of going against their morals and inflicting fatal harm on someone else just from obedience to an authority. The Milgram experiment was able to reach its objectives of determining the effect obedience to authority had on the level of cruelty that the German soldiers demonstrated by collecting data on how far on the voltage scale ordinary people were willing to go. The more professional the experimenter looked, their presence nearby the learner, and the prestige of the experiment location all impacted how willing the participants were to inflict harm.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment was designed “to see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measurable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain on a protesting victim” (Milgram 79). Milgram discovered that many people were willing to go all the way to 450 volts when ordered by the experimenter. He concluded that the majority of people will go against their conscience if the authority shows unwavering power and determination to accomplish a…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram and Stanford Experiment During the Milgram and Stanford experiment, each person had a special role. When given a role, people try their best to fulfill their duties no matter what is required of them. These experiments aim to understand how far someone will go to obey their superiors and follow instructions. You were either a prisoner, guard, teacher, or a learner. Each and every one of these participants were influenced into having demand characteristics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Obedience to authority is a huge impact on a person’s morality. To further extend this idea the question on why do people with strong values, principles, ethics challenge and go against their morals when faced with an authority figure needs to be asked.. Many ideas are produced when asked this question; the focus will be on the internal forces that push someone to do something they normally would not do. Fear, conformality, and other internal experiences such as responsibility among others fuel the obedience to authority and change the way a person behaves. Michael Shermer and Saul Mcleod both provide extensive information on the stimulus of the obedience.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In each experiment and the movie that very thing happened. In Milgram's experiment the “teachers” listened to the instructor, even when the “learner” was screaming out in agony. So when a soldier is given an order from one of his superiors he is likely to carry it out even if the act is immoral. The soldier doesn't want to disobey the superior, and the fact that the order is coming from a higher up somewhat distorts the morals of the soldier. It no longer is seen as wrong by the soldier, all he or she thinks is that a higher up order it so it must be okay.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dr. Guerin, we recently had an assignment over the Milgram Experiment. I remember the whole situation with the prank caller pretending to be a cop at a McDonalds. Recently a prank caller called several business and had them break the windows out. I found it to be interesting and I thought you might too.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Experiment Introduction Many people question whether the Milgram experiment was ethical or not, and whether the experiment should had been allowed at all. But like most significant psychological discoveries, sometimes ethics could’ve been overseen in order to obtain great data. Because of Milgram experiment, psychologists today have a better understanding of group dynamics. Milgram’s experiment enabled better understanding of human obedience to an authority figure. Ethics that might have been violated throughout the process of Milgram’s study can be justified in the experiment itself.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    THE MEANING OF ETHICS: 1. Describe mind tyrants and explain their significance to the study of ethics. Identify two original examples of mind tyrants. Mind tyrants are an individual’s thoughts and ideas that are influenced by customs, traditions, and social norms. These tyrants play a vital role in establishing what one might believe is right, wrong, good, or bad.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays