Milgram Strengths And Weaknesses

Improved Essays
An experiment to test how far a person is willing to go in the name of obedience was conducted at Yale University. People are usually obedient to people with power or above them, therefore, in this experiment an administrator would tell the test subjects to shock the victim, who was obviously, an actor/someone in on the experiment. In this article the author, Stanley Milgram elaborates and describes the experiment.
Like any other article out there, there are weakness along with strengths. The author, Milgram, gave some background information on obedience and explain obedience can make people do positive things, however, can also make people do evil and inhumane things. For example, the article mentioned how Hitler got all those Nazis to be obedient and do such horrible and heartless things. Another strength of this article was that there were some related studies that were mentioned, which is great for anyone that is interested in learning more about this topic. Lasty, the
…show more content…
The accomplices that were acting as the learner/victim weren't really described in the article, therefore if the author just added a brief description of the learners the readers can get a better picture of the experiment. Also the subjects were interview after the experiment to make sure they left the lab in a state of well being. Milgram didn’t really elaborate on the interview itself. I think the readers would appreciate knowing what the subjects thought after the experiment was over. Furthermore, the article didn’t really mention if the subjects were informed about the experiment in the end. The subjects, in my opinion deserve an explanation of what the purpose of these procedures

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dalrymple logically states, “Milgram proved that it was obedience to authority that led people to behave in this fashion, rather than, say, the unleashing of a latent sadistic urge to inflict pain on people.” He accurately describes this quote in his article because the subjects upset the learner by following the study behind obedience (Dalrymple 120). Yvonne Williams, a social psychologist studying the Holocaust, positions that obedience to authority is not an aspect that could be fixed, but it rather depends on the cultures a person might be raised with (Williams). While Dalrymple effectively refers to this, Baumrind dissimilarity argues that the German Officers viewed the Jewish people “as subhuman and not worthy of consideration” because they did not believe they were in the wrong. Baumrind logically states that Milgram is concerned with the social consequences of destructive obedience, because he demonstrates the problem about how the German Officers during the Holocaust were forced to obey, or else they were to be killed (Baumrind 93).…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Variations of his experiment have been conducted over many years and in other settings with similar findings. The effect of authority on obedience is striking. People obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative, even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. The vast majority of people will obey authority even when it overrides their own moral judgement. Their feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated, and responsibility shifts in the mind of the subordinate to that of the authority figure.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Few Good Men was written by Aaron Sorkin and it is about a lawyer trying to defend two marines accused of murder. The two marines claimed to have received an order to discipline another marine and killed him in the process. The lawyer, Lt. Daniel Kaffee, then has to gather evidence for this claim and eventually get Colonel Jessep to state he gave the marines the order. The story encompasses many factors of obedience to authority and peer pressure and shows what can happen when orders are followed blindly. Many experiments and studies have taken place to explain why people follow orders even if it might violate their morals and result in someone getting hurt.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Milgram’s experiment he uncovered that “For many people, obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed a potent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy, and moral conduct” (691). Most Germans carried out the…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first flaw Baumrind finds in Milgram’s experiment is the fact that the subjects are in an unfamiliar setting in the laboratory; therefore, the subjects are more likely to be anxious. She believes that the laboratory is not an ideal location to study obedience because the subject is expected to be more obedient due to this anxiety (Baumrind 90). Milgram would likely refute this fault by reasoning that the subject can be expected to be just as anxious in a laboratory as in a real life situation where someone else’s well-being is also a matter of circumstance. He may refer to Eichmann’s subordinates during the Holocaust: they could have been just as uneasy about killing hundreds of Jews as the subjects were about shocking the learner in the experiment (Milgram 89). However, Baumrind could stress the fact that the experiment in itself was not a real life situation.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She argues that the experiment was affecting the participant even after they were done and had been de-briefed of what the study was actually about, as well as seeing and talking to the ”learner” (the guy who they thought they were electrocuting). Baumrind was also arguing the fact the the experiment had little ecological validity as subjects are more prone to abide in such environments, she also states that participants experienced long-term, negative psychological consequences as a result of their participation in Milgram’s experiment. Milgram had counterpoints for all of her statements, explaining himself and his thought process and why it was necessary towards the experiment. Baumrind says that Milgram 's experimental situations are not sufficiently accurate models of real-life experience, his sampling techniques are seldom of a scope which would justify the meaning with which he would like to endow his result, as well as result are hard to reproduce. These combined is considered unethical, as this experiment would never have been accepted by any institutions today.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a similar fashion, the experimenter in the Milgram experiment makes this idea concrete. Milgram states, “ [t]he essence of obedience is that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person’s wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as responsible for his actions” (87). By being obedient, a person can be taken advantage of by authority and in turn abandon their moral…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their theory was that most people will do anything they are told, if the order is given by a person in authority or what they perceive as an authoritative figure. The experiments and observations defied morals and common sense. Obedience, a virtue, is giving up of one’s self to another if they are in authority even if it is wrong. Disobedience is a vice and is the not giving up of one’s self, standing up, even in the face of being wrong or ridiculed.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays