Analysis Of Socrates Theory Of Immortality Of The Soul

Superior Essays
Plato’s collection of dialogue on the account of immortality of the soul depicts a conversation between Socrates and his disciple, Cebes, on the understanding of proof as to why in fact, the soul is immortal above the physicality of the body. Socrates rationalizes his philosophical theory though means of example and reasoning. Although his theory provides thorough justification there is no tangible proof to support his ideas. Earlier in the reading Simmias, another disciple of Socrates presented a theory, which Socrates then swiftly debunked that classified the soul as an attunement of all combinations that creates the human presence. While it is not the focus of the reading, this theory can provide enlightenment into further understanding Socrates theory of immorality of the soul. Socrates provides good …show more content…
In short, three is without fail an odd number, but as is five, seven, nine, and so on. Therefore, three cannot be separated from being odd, but odd does not necessarily have to be three. Moreover, even and odd are opposites, yet two and three are not. As such, “ three, although not the opposite of even, nevertheless does not admit it.” (86) Therefore in regards to the soul, one may think of it in relation to odd, and life as three. The soul is still the soul without the physicality of life, but not the contrary. Life does not exist without the soul. The opposite of life is death, yet the soul does not possess a counterpart. Thus, according to Socrates, if soul cannot admit death it is inevitably immortal (87). If by characteristics of order, an entity that cannot die, or is immortal, must then also be indestructible. As death approaches man the mortal part of him will die, but the immortal part of him will be relinquished unscathed. Plato records Socrates last note in this dialogue as “soul is immortal and imperishable, and that our souls will really exist in the next world.”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. Why does Socrates say that he is not afraid of death? Why is he hopeful that death is good? What do you think about what he says? Socrates refuses to fear death because he feels “wherever a man has taken up a position because he considers it best, or has been posted there by his commander, that is where he should remain” (Plato 27) Faithfully taken up the position as a philosopher, Socrates has been commanded by his god to examine himself and others, which he claims “is the duty of leading a philosophical life” (Plato 27)…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abdulkabir Adejumo Professor Escalante PHILO 1301 11/2/2017 Response Paper 1 “Do We Survive Death?” In this interesting chapter, James Rachels starts by uncovering the philosophy of Socrates about the immortal soul. At that point, he utilizes the scientific argument to conflict with Socrates' conclusion about the presence of the soul as a piece of the human body.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ argument at the end of Apology is that death is a blessing in one of two ways. It is either a “state of nothingness” or it is a “migration of the soul.” If death is comprised of nothingness, then it should be looked forward to because it would be a peaceful and restful sleep. On the other hand, if death is a migration of his soul, then Socrates would be able to be in the presence of the great people that have died before him, so he would be able to enjoy the afterlife surrounded by great figures that he could question regarding their wisdom. Socrates’ argument that death is a “state of nothingness” is self-contradictory because something cannot become nothing if it was once something, so his argument that death would comprise…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Phaedo, Socrates’ first argument of Immortality is the Cyclical Argument of Opposites . This argument is based on an ancient doctrine which affirms that the living descend from the dead . According to this philosophy,…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Phaedo, Simmias believes that the soul is similar to the harmony made from an instrument. Socrates points out two statements that make Simmias rethink his views on the soul and the body. As Socrates turns down Simmias 's theory of the soul, not only is he able to convince Simmias, he is also able to make great arguments that support his ideas on how the soul cannot be relatable to the attunement of an instrument. Simmias 's opinion on the soul is that the harmony that is produced by an instrument is similar to the relationship between the body and the soul. Simmias mentions that the soul exists before it enters into the body of a person however the soul is composed of elements that do not exist yet.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are countless beliefs on the nature of death, and to limit the possibilities down to only two choices seems foolish. As a third outcome consider the possibility of reincarnation. Already one can conclude that there are more than 2 viable possibilities regarding death. This bold statement made by Socrates is not only incorrect, but the statement is contradictory to his previous testimonials within Apology “…he thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas when I do not know, neither do I think I know…” (Apology…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5pts. Socrates offers the idea of opposites during his last hours on earth with his friends. He offers the argument that everything that is in this world came from its opposite. For example, for something small to get bigger, it must be small to start with and get bigger out of being small, the same idea can apply to hot/cold, heaven/hell, for any opposite in the world there is including the idea of living. Socrates asks Cebes in the Phato if there is an opposite of living, which we know to be “death/dead.”…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are many arguments put forth in Plato’s Phaedo concerning the nature of the soul and life before and after death. Socrates, in his final holding cell, explains to his friends and colleagues the reasoning behind his calm disposition upon his impending doom. Socrates believes that through practicing philosophy, he has already practiced the act of dying, or being separated from his bodily woes and pleasures. Through his argument from affinity, Socrates believes that not only will his soul not be destroyed upon death, but also that he will also rightly be joined in the company gods. However, Simmias cares to differ with his argument of harmony.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Socrates’ view the mortality and “goodness” that an individual has overweighs the evils that challenge and attempt to hurt them as it is something he believes strongly in and even in death a good soul can’t be…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For in Plato’s Phaedo, the soul is understood to merely be harbored in the body for a brief period. According to the Argument from the Form of Life, the soul, as being what gives life to a body, is the form of life thereby and cannot admit the opposite form, which is death (Plato 105D). Hence, the soul is indeed deathless (Plato 105E). We can see that the establishment of a kind of dualism motivates this argument. The soul is successful characterized as completely distinct and separate from the body.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the Republic, Plato mentions the soul several times. Plato agrees that the soul is immortal and separate from the body. He also believes that the soul is eternal and according to Plato, the soul doesn’t come into existence with the body, but rather exists prior to being with the body. He believed that the soul exists inside the body until it dies. Because of this, Plato called the body the prison to the soul.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, some sections Socrates’s case on the fear of death dwell on personal opinions of the philosopher. Subsequently, for an argument to remain sound and valid, all the section of the idea should be based on facts and logic as opposed to the personal opinions that do not have a rational basis. Even so, the formal and quantitative way of measuring the fear of death, the grandest blessing as death, as well as the good or evil associated with death does not exist. In the same way, no parameter is available to ascertain the measurement to prove or disapprove faith from the perspective of embracing death while not fearing the unknown. As Socrates purports in his argument not to fear death, the way of thinking and his opinion would not aid in confronting his mortality.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In order to understand the positions held by each thinker, we must first decipher what the terms, soul and immortality mean to both Plato and Hume respectively. For Plato, the soul is an unextended, incomposite and immaterial substance which functions as a bridge between the metaphysical world of forms and the material world we live in. He finds the soul to be definitionally distinct from the body, because it is the immaterial aspect of a human being, whereas the body is the material aspect. Hume, on the other hand, opposes this dualism and argues that the soul and body are the same thing. The term immortality is used the same way by both philosophers to depict, an eternal continuity of consciousness after physical death.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics