Socrates Choice And Crito's Argument

Improved Essays
The Crito: Socrates’ Choice and Crito’s Argument
The Crito by Plato takes place in a prison cell the night before the execution of Socrates. His friend Crito visits him in the night with plans to sneak him out of prison and into hiding before morning. However, Socrates has come to terms with his death and refuses Crito’s offers, knowing that when he dies he will be judged for his choices on earth and must descend to the underworld having lived a life of justice.
Although Crito presents a tempting offer when trying to save Socrates from execution, Socrates is right to accept his sentence and deny offers of liberation. He knows it does not matter what the majority will say or think of his death, the only opinion of importance is that of the one who understands the actual truth, whom he will meet
…show more content…
“But”, he responds to himself, “the majority can put us to death… And now examine this further one to see whether we think it still stands or not: the most important thing isn’t living, but living well… We should examine whether or not it would be just for me to try and get out of here when the Athenians haven’t acquitted me. And if it does seem just, we should make the attempt, and if it doesn’t, we should abandon the effort.” (Crito. 81-82.) With this possibility on the table, Socrates leads Crito in evaluation of his current situation asking: “...Whether the majority of people agree or not, and whether we must suffer still worse things than at present or ones that are easier to bear, it’s true, all the same, that doing injustice in any circumstances is bad and shameful for the one who does it?” (Crito. 82). Of course, Crito agrees that one should never do injustice to which Socrates replies, “Should one do the things one has agreed with someone to do, provided they are just, or should one cheat?” Once again, Crito immediately agrees, stating that one must stand by his just

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Socrates, more than most, ought to be as per this agreement, as he has carried on seventy years completely content with the Athenian lifestyle. If Socrates somehow managed to break from jail now, having so reliably approved the social contract, he would be making himself a bandit who might not be welcome in some other enlightened state for whatever is left of his life. Furthermore, when he bites the dust, he will be cruelly judged in the underworld for carrying on shamefully towards his city's laws. Subsequently, Socrates persuades Crito that it would be better not to endeavor a getaway.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, not all authorities are delighted in God’s eyes. In addition, God’s laws are over all laws. It is wrong to obey the laws that break God’s laws. In Socrates’ case, the law had been incorrectly applied. He was mistreated.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates, the classical Greek philosopher and one of the founders of western philosophy, was accused by the people of being an atheist and corrupting the youth with his ideas. He was, then put into trial in which the jury decided that he was guilty, and finally he was sentenced to death. While being in the prison, waiting for the execution process, Crito, one of Socrates’ friends, came to visit him offering a plan by which Socrates can escape from prison before the day of his execution. However, Socrates refused to escape the death sentence. A large argument took place between Socrates and Crito concerning whether Socrates shall escape or not.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the trolley portly fella case we can reference Socrates and Plato in The Five Dialogues to find an answer to this dilemma. The book of Crito portrays the scene of Socrates in his jail cell awaiting execution being approached by an old friend, Crito, a philosopher and nobleman with sufficient funds to help Socrates escape from his prison cell. Crito attempts to convince Socrates to escape through a couple different arguments. The first argument that Crito presents is his reputation argument in which he states, “Surely there can be no worse reputation than to be to the value money more highly than one’s friends, for the majority will not believe that you yourself were not willing to leave prison while we were eager for you to do so.” Cito is essentially saying that that people will think that Crito chose his money over saving Socrates to which Socrates simply rebuts, “My good Crito, why should we care so much for what the majority think?…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is also faced with a decision to follow the unjust law in escaping jail or the just law in remaining and facing death. Conflicted, Socrates explores the meaning of just and unjust laws. King explores similar terrains in asking the question, "How can you advocate breaking the laws and obeying others? " In the end, Socrates convinces Crito that it would be best to remain in jail and not attempt an escape.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By saying that all wrong doings are unjust is disregarding those who have good intentions and reasons for commiting something bad. When Critos is explaining that no man should injure or hurt another Socrates answers, “then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him” (Plato 1). Crito is left thinking as Socrates clearly points out the flaws in his argument. This exemplifies Critos illogical statements and how he contradicts himself because when explaining that no one should do wrong he is at the same time persuading Socrates to escape the prison which would be going against the law and what he is proposing as well. Not only that…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates is a man of interrogation and critical thinking and Crito does an excellent job of bringing up points that give Socrates something to think about. Socrates loves justice, and in Critos tells the former that what he is doing is unjust. The reason that Socrates doesn’t want to escape is because he thinks it to be…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito Summary

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The dialogue “Crito” happens in Socrates’ jail cell, where he awaits execution for corrupting the morals of the youth and insulting the gods. He is visited before dawn by his old friend Crito (whom the dialogue is named after), who bribed the guards to look the other way while he smuggles Socrates out of prison to the safety of exile. Socrates appears to be very eager to anticipate his up and coming execution, thus Crito presents the greatest number of contentions as he can to induce Socrates to get away. On a more practical level, Socrates' passing will severely hurt his companions (friends) and people will think they didn’t do anything to attempt to spare him. Likewise, Socrates ought not to stress over the danger or the budgetary expense…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout their conversation, Crito discusses with Socrates why he believes Socrates should flee. However, this leads Socrates to question the power of state and the laws. The Laws that make up the state is a crucial factor in “Crito”. In fact, the Laws are so important in Socrates 's discussion that they become a voice, almost like another person. He thinks thoroughly and examines them because he believes that every citizen has an agreement with Laws.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    82-83. Print.). This is important because Crito is playing on the argument Socrates made earlier about forsaking his duty to improve others through his teachings, arguing that allowing himself to be executed unjustly before he could teach his children would be unjust. Socrates responds to Crito’s argument by saying that, with him gone his friends will look after his children, and that escaping from his punishment would bring his family…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Contradiction of Socrates Plato illustrates Socrates in two different aspects in The Apology and in The Crito, which makes the reader ponder which interpretation of Socrates is substantial and which is fictions. Precisely, Plato portrayed Socrates with many inconsistencies in The Apology the emphasis was on obeying the Gods in contrast in The Crito the emphasis was on obeying the laws of Athens. In Plato’s Apology initiates with Socrates’ defense to the Athenian court demonstrating his innocence of the charges brought against him. Socrates was accused of breaking various laws under the Athenian court, the most significant laws were corrupting the youth and believing and worshiping in different Gods that the rest of the citizens in…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crito of course had other reasons as to why Socrates should escape, but to Socrates the public’s opinions whether he committed his crimes should not be of concern and escaping his fate of death would be an act of injustice. For example, Socrates explains that it 's not necessary to value all opinions people hold, but regard the sound instead of the flawed (Plato, 85). He also enters the Laws of Athens as a reason to act justly, even in the face of death. For instance, being that the laws have always worked in his favor of keeping the world fair, he understood since he has had a chance to plead his case and he failed to persuade the jury he must now obey the punishment one is to receive for the crime accused of (Plato, 89). Along with wanting to do the right thing by the law; Socrates is also worried his ways of not following the rules will follow him into his next life when he faces the judges of the underworld (Plato, 94).…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Crito, a dialogue written by Plato, the Greek philosopher Socrates is sentenced to death because of corrupting the youth, creating new gods, and being an atheist. Centuries later, another prominent figure, Martin Luther King, Jr., is jailed for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963. When questioned of their imprisonment, Plato and King, Jr. are both determined to maintain justice despite the injustices charged against them, but for Plato, justice means upholding the law at all costs since one should do no wrong, whereas King is concerned with reforming the law, therefore doing wrong could make a “right”. To both King and Socrates, a portion of injustice in law damages justice as a whole.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s “Apology” examines the trial of a great philosopher named Socrates. He is brought to court because of corrupting the youth and not believing in Gods. In response against his accusers, Socrates maintains that being sentenced to death is a possibility. While others fear death, as it is an evil; he does not fear it as he views death positively. According to Socrates, death is an advantage.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays