Why? From a ethical stand point, it is without a doubt that Juan owns his greatest loyalty to the clients at the Willow River Center. As emphasized in the mission statement of the Social Work Code of Ethics (NASW), the primary responsibility of a social worker is to advocate and improve the well-being of all living beings. In other words, social worker are morally and constitutionally obligated to help all persons, especially the clients, meet their basic needs of survival. As indicated in the Willow River case, social worker Juan was responsible for managing services for residents at this employer. Therefore, as a moral requirement embedded in the NASW Code of Ethics; Juan is occupational and ethically responsible for the well-being of all clients at the Willow River Developmental Disabilities center. Consequently, it is only rational to reason that Juan owned his greatest loyalty to the clients. Also, based on the knowledge obtained from the literature and class discussions from the social work practice one course, it has been elaborated upon over and over again, that the responsibility of the social worker requires the worker to advocate for client’s rights. But more important, it was stated during the course of the semester, that social workers are obligated to empower client at all times. So, Juan’s decision to challenge his employers in search for better treatment for his clients is a clear indication that the loyalty of a social worker has been completely implanted in the interest of his clients. For this reason along, it is safe to say social worker Juan has don’t his job beyond measurable moral and constitutional
Why? From a ethical stand point, it is without a doubt that Juan owns his greatest loyalty to the clients at the Willow River Center. As emphasized in the mission statement of the Social Work Code of Ethics (NASW), the primary responsibility of a social worker is to advocate and improve the well-being of all living beings. In other words, social worker are morally and constitutionally obligated to help all persons, especially the clients, meet their basic needs of survival. As indicated in the Willow River case, social worker Juan was responsible for managing services for residents at this employer. Therefore, as a moral requirement embedded in the NASW Code of Ethics; Juan is occupational and ethically responsible for the well-being of all clients at the Willow River Developmental Disabilities center. Consequently, it is only rational to reason that Juan owned his greatest loyalty to the clients. Also, based on the knowledge obtained from the literature and class discussions from the social work practice one course, it has been elaborated upon over and over again, that the responsibility of the social worker requires the worker to advocate for client’s rights. But more important, it was stated during the course of the semester, that social workers are obligated to empower client at all times. So, Juan’s decision to challenge his employers in search for better treatment for his clients is a clear indication that the loyalty of a social worker has been completely implanted in the interest of his clients. For this reason along, it is safe to say social worker Juan has don’t his job beyond measurable moral and constitutional