Social Class, Solipsism, And Contextualism Essay

1130 Words null Page
All humans are born in a cultural and a social setting that incorporates social class, family or the community among others. Cultures and their respective subcultures may create different influences, but the activities of social classes are determined by the societies under which people are born. This paper will address the aspect of social classes and analyze various articles to augment the cases
The article Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different from the Poor suggests that social class is highly influenced by material resources as well as the status of an individual. This statement is true. The perceptions of rank incorporated in society determine the type of interaction among people as well as their activities and social outcomes. However, constrained or very low resources and low ranks tend to create the lower class for individuals (Griffin and Hargis 21). I also agree that lower ranks in the society tend to supplement contextualized tendencies. These tendencies create social forces that allow the control of life outcomes of certain individuals (Kraus, Piff, Mendoza-Denton, Rheinschmidt, and Keltner 551). Abundant resources, on the other hand, may create upper social ranks that supplement societal respect and recognition.
In my analysis, upper-class individuals tend to experience more personal freedoms that in most cases may supplement the existence of solipsistic societal as well as cognitive tendencies. "Social Class, Solipsism, and…

Related Documents