Similarities Between Nihilism And Existentialism

Superior Essays
Existentialism, by definition, is a philosophical theory or approach that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of free will. Simply stated, existentialism has a special regard to an individualist approach and the sense of free will. This is very different from nihilism which is defined as the rejection of all religious beliefs and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless. There are several reasons why these two philosophical viewpoints contrast but, I find it difficult to understand how there could be more than one way these two things are similar. Existentialists believe in the idea of “existence proceeding essence.” This means …show more content…
However, I have come to find that there is one major way that these two approaches are similar. Both viewpoints have concluded that there is no real or true meaning to life. From an existential standpoint, there is no true meaning to life because we go our whole lives working and growing toward the person that we will end up being and use these experiences that we go through to become that person. Yet, somehow, we still all run the risk of never being fully satisfied with who we’ve become. Typically, there are a few things that we wish we could change about ourselves, just little tweaks here and there; or we wish were totally different people than who we actually are. Either way, it is easy to see why an existentialist would conclude that there is little to no meaning in life. From a Nihilistic standpoint, it is simple to see why they would conclude that life is meaningless. Nihilists discard every moral, religion, and value, and they have no faith that anything is certain. Living a life this way would make it extremely difficult to believe in any sort of meaning to life, especially if they are skeptical to the meaning of all the things around them and even themselves. Both viewpoints also share the same understanding that life and the future are both very uncertain and that there is no way to predict what is to come, destiny and faith are non-conversed topics among the two

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This safe route allows them to ignore and avoid the friction, but that never brings anything good into their life. People are so afraid to face their true selves and to actually fight for what they believe in. This anxiety can come from fear of failure, rejection, or even letting themselves down. If we avoid this friction, we are in fact failing ourselves, rejecting our passions, and letting our…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people may go ahead and steal to stay alive while others may choose to act differently and do the complete opposite. Your actions solely depend on you and what type of person you are. Stace also claims that it is delusion to think that determinism is incompatible with free will meanwhile it is merely impossible for them to be compatible as determinism claims that freedom is just an illusion while free will is the complete opposite and is the notion that people are free to act and behave as they please. How can free will and determinism be compatible when people have no control of the causes that occur around them which according to Stace is the reason that they act in a certain manner? If people are not able to genuinely control their actions due to predetermined causes that make them act a certain way, then do they really have free will?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On top of that, Mill feels as though an oppressed opinion results in a loss for society because even if an opinion is false, it may have some truth to it, and unless the opinion is voiced, the truth will never be heard. Every opinion should be argued against because…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All these ideas seem be based on loose speculation that don’t have much merit in terms of the bigger picture. Proponents of the Libertarian view on free will would argue that free will is independent of agents of causation therefore, actions are based only on whether the individual desires to complete the action. At its core, Libertarianism rejects determinism and focuses on ideas that concern themselves with liberal independence. I would respond by stating that, actions need foundations from which they are based on. Human nature checks free will by allowing for a reason for actions being chosen and executed.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separateness Of Persons

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Nozick this notion is flawed as “to use a person [for another’s benefit] does not sufficiently respect and take account of the fact that he is a separate person, that his is the only life he has. He does not get some overbalancing good from his sacrifice”. To put more plainly, the theory suggests that sacrificing the life of one person in order to maximise overall utility is still immoral, for that person is an individual in their own right and will not benefit from acting in this way. Utilitarianist’s fail to recognise that we are all separate beings in our own right. Instead it treats being’s as mere ‘repositories of…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a moral law to be valid and obligating, it must carry “absolute necessity.” Two important concepts to keep in mind that are central to Kant’s moral philosophy are good will and duty. Good will is a good without qualifications and a duty is the necessity of an action done out of respect for the moral law. The concept of morality is particularly important in relation to Kant’s views on liberty and freedom. Kant believes we can be free if we follow the moral law. He also reckons we need freedom to create an enlightened society and achieve happiness.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They became extremely dependent upon this idea of Godot coming that they have lost the motivation or inspiration to actually do anything else. They have no meaning other than him and cannot escape it—they cannot escape their lives. They are imprisoned by belief, whereas Lucy has the potential to escape because she knows why and who she is waiting for. Vladimir and Estragon are wholly responsible for their self-imprisonment because of their dedication to not abandon an unknown being. Waiting is not living for anyone and these characters are incapable of acknowledging.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is different with libertarianism as determinism believes that we were already determined by certain causes outside of the power of will, while libertarianism believes in the theory that we are truly free in our choices. They also disagree on the idea of responsibility; determinist does not believe we can be responsible when we have no free will, while libertarians think differently. Although determinism and libertarianism have little to none in common, compatibilism can bring them together. The way that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Although compatibilism and libertarianism are similar, they can also be quite different.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Indeterminism

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is the nature of freedom? Or a better question should be, what is free will and do we have it? The definition of free will is not a simple answer. Free will tries to account for our introspective belief that we have control of our actions and as a result, our own destiny. Nothing in our lives is predetermined and every cause has an effect.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism. The first theory…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays