Yes, I agree that the knowers’s perspective is important in the search of shared knowledge until a point where emotion and reason are creating a bias on your perspective. In that, a knower’s perspective regards the individuals personal knowledge. The pursuit of knowledge regards how the individual gains/seeks shared knowledge. So to what extent does the knower’s reliability shape the pursuit for shared knowledge? Religion is typically a devotion thing creating emotion. Natural Science however was based off of scientists reasons causing a bias. And Mathematics which is based off of facts and being named an universal language. In the religion of Islam for example, Muslims are to live off the the moral principles of the five pillars, the Quran,
…show more content…
Shared knowledge is the product of work from more than one individual. Thus, if many people have reviewed an experiment then any sort of experimental error would probably be pointed out at some time. If something is to be certain then it has to be knowledge and not simply a belief. Thus, shared knowledge helps gives reason and perception on the experiment. Thus, making the experiment more certain. How can personal knowledge be justified with reason? This claim brings up the problem of pushing to be correct, and neglecting the evidence that is clearly present. To the extent that scientists fall into a belief bias. A physicists wanted there own theory to be correct and proven correct, that they forced themselves to agree that they were correct. Some physicists even fell into adwou, because there was no evidence to prove that there theory was correct or incorrect. Due to it being a new theory, yet once the theory was looked over and evidence started to form. The physicists still stayed firm on the belief that there theory was …show more content…
For religion especially, emotions could shade the absolute truth in your personal knowledge. The same thing can be said in natural science with the scientist of Pasteur. Who fell into many biases and perspective dilemmas. This meaning that the knower’s perspective is highly needed so that the perspective does not become to bias. Due to all the shared knowledge. Contrary to these two areas of knowledge is mathematics. In that, mathematics is said to be an universal language. Where the certainty and reliability is
Shared knowledge is the product of work from more than one individual. Thus, if many people have reviewed an experiment then any sort of experimental error would probably be pointed out at some time. If something is to be certain then it has to be knowledge and not simply a belief. Thus, shared knowledge helps gives reason and perception on the experiment. Thus, making the experiment more certain. How can personal knowledge be justified with reason? This claim brings up the problem of pushing to be correct, and neglecting the evidence that is clearly present. To the extent that scientists fall into a belief bias. A physicists wanted there own theory to be correct and proven correct, that they forced themselves to agree that they were correct. Some physicists even fell into adwou, because there was no evidence to prove that there theory was correct or incorrect. Due to it being a new theory, yet once the theory was looked over and evidence started to form. The physicists still stayed firm on the belief that there theory was …show more content…
For religion especially, emotions could shade the absolute truth in your personal knowledge. The same thing can be said in natural science with the scientist of Pasteur. Who fell into many biases and perspective dilemmas. This meaning that the knower’s perspective is highly needed so that the perspective does not become to bias. Due to all the shared knowledge. Contrary to these two areas of knowledge is mathematics. In that, mathematics is said to be an universal language. Where the certainty and reliability is