Shared Knowledge In Research

Better Essays
Yes, I agree that the knowers’s perspective is important in the search of shared knowledge until a point where emotion and reason are creating a bias on your perspective. In that, a knower’s perspective regards the individuals personal knowledge. The pursuit of knowledge regards how the individual gains/seeks shared knowledge. So to what extent does the knower’s reliability shape the pursuit for shared knowledge? Religion is typically a devotion thing creating emotion. Natural Science however was based off of scientists reasons causing a bias. And Mathematics which is based off of facts and being named an universal language. In the religion of Islam for example, Muslims are to live off the the moral principles of the five pillars, the Quran, …show more content…
Shared knowledge is the product of work from more than one individual. Thus, if many people have reviewed an experiment then any sort of experimental error would probably be pointed out at some time. If something is to be certain then it has to be knowledge and not simply a belief. Thus, shared knowledge helps gives reason and perception on the experiment. Thus, making the experiment more certain. How can personal knowledge be justified with reason? This claim brings up the problem of pushing to be correct, and neglecting the evidence that is clearly present. To the extent that scientists fall into a belief bias. A physicists wanted there own theory to be correct and proven correct, that they forced themselves to agree that they were correct. Some physicists even fell into adwou, because there was no evidence to prove that there theory was correct or incorrect. Due to it being a new theory, yet once the theory was looked over and evidence started to form. The physicists still stayed firm on the belief that there theory was …show more content…
For religion especially, emotions could shade the absolute truth in your personal knowledge. The same thing can be said in natural science with the scientist of Pasteur. Who fell into many biases and perspective dilemmas. This meaning that the knower’s perspective is highly needed so that the perspective does not become to bias. Due to all the shared knowledge. Contrary to these two areas of knowledge is mathematics. In that, mathematics is said to be an universal language. Where the certainty and reliability is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    I am a Christian and I believe that all life came to be through God. Science does make it more difficult to believe these days, because they try and explain all of the wonders of God by using science. For a lot of people this has a big impact on their faith and it might cause them to stop believing, but I feel that if your faith is strong enough you can overcome all of these things and still believe. I am also a person that enjoys science but I feel that science can only be used to explain thing up to a point. The things that are still a mystery to us today and that cannot be explained by science are the miracles of God and us as humans should not try and comprehend…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Science Vs Religion Essay

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The difference between the two are the absolute qualities. Religion teaches absolute truth, despite the ability to prove or be proven wrong. Science stresses the potential ability to, over time, explain everything. However, the inability to prove certain aspects causes strain on both interpretations. The great difference between the two are the impression of scientific laws diminishing the space for divine action.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Myers is called the Levels-of-Explanation view. A great way to start with this approach is to understand that it emphasizes a multi-layered perspective. This view offers a lens that welcomes openness and complementary perspectives that can be used to build bridges between the gaps between science and faith. During this journey, it is crucial for individuals to be cautious of bias and cultures. The L-O-E approach points out that people tend to stick to their own perspective when they are searching for truth.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Aquinas says we must think critically about our faith, as we cannot just simply accept it. Science can sometimes challenge our faith, which turns out to be a good thing because that forces us to analyze why we believe what we do. A person’s faith journey should not be stagnant, but like science, it should be always striving for betterment. Nicolaus Copernicus was another person with both religious and science backgrounds, who was able to successfully live a life believing in both with no qualms. He was a Renaissance mathematician and astronomer who formulated a model of the universe that placed the Sun rather than the Earth at the center of the universe.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is because of the frightening thought that we as individuals can never truly know everything there is to know about the universe and the world we live in. If we as individuals cannot know everything, we would feel safer if at least some person out there did. Then that person could make the more informed, correct decisions in regards to important matters. This wish to believe that someone in the world knows “everything” is what helps to fuel the false belief that “Science can prove anything.” Scientist may not come right out and say it, but if they present their theories and hypothesis in a manner intended to convince the general public, without first cautioning the possible fallibility of their statements, the scientist are, in essences, pretending to know it all. It is vital to remember that scientist are fallible human beings just like us, they are not some unbiased enlightened people in white coats.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Religion Vs. Science

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The solution to most problems that society is facing day-to-day is not black and white. A gray area is always present which can be perplexing to grasp our thoughts around. Similarly, the question concerning the idea of religion conflicting with science is not a black or white answer but rather a gray area one. Religious faith and scientific understanding, as the two are used to explain both natural and supernatural phenomena on one’s own accord, are not in conflict with each other because it is a personal choice to allow it to contradict or conflict one’s own belief. Religion and science may both appear similar yet confounding simultaneously.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Secondly, Karl Popper thinks that if science had followed an induction path, it would not have made such progress. An example case would be described when a scientist arrives at a generalization. If she/ he follows the induction method, he or she will go in search of instances which establish it as truth. If he/ she finds an instance which conflicts with her/ his generalization and establishment, then the scientist is required to qualify the generalization mentioning that the generalization is really true except, in the cases where it has been held to be false or rather unsupported. The type of such qualifications imposes heavy limitations and curtailment restrictions on the scope of the generalization.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Both the scientific community, and religious faithful forget the truthful fact, that neither side can ever be correct. Science is mostly based around theories that are constantly changing, while religion is based on teachings from the Holy Book. Science today features possibilities of genetic engineering and other ways to alter life that religious followers view as unethical. The lack of long term studies should lead to a healthy skepticism of the future of scientific discovery, as there could exist potential repercussions for altering life. Furthermore, the religious community should learn to embrace the possibilities that science holds, because it, like religion, preaches hope for a better tomorrow.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Popper Falsification

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Popper, as part of his career long attempt to support empiricism in science, proposed a doctrine of falsification. This directly contrasts verification, a central theme to logical positivism. A claim is empirically verifiable if observation and experimentation produce statements which logically imply the truth of the claim. Popper rejected the logical empiricists' ideas given that “verificationism” does not allow for claims within a universal scope to be subject to verification.1 This is because there are so many permutations of approaches to verifying something claimed by science. Opposite to this, a universal claim can be falsified by a single negative instance.1 For example, by observing one red minivan, the claim "all minivans are…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Religion And Science Is Complement Each Other Introduction Science and religion are two entities that occupy an important position in the philosophy of science. The position of both branches of the discipline to give each other positive value in addressing the problems of life and humanity. It is caused by human nature as thinking beings who always want rationality. Humans are also experienced and witnessed to the problems associated with the dimensions of the mysteries in life that can not be solved except by reference to religion, so the existence of religions-which besides a belief system that requires the truth, as well as practical action against the application of trust (faith) who have recognized the truth through science methodology…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays