At the date of the articles publication in 1937, St Augustine’s historical prominence as a Spanish coastal city was lost under the …show more content…
Americans from Beeson’s perspective would not only attain a tourist attraction from a newly historically renovated Saint Augustine, but they would also receive a firsthand educational glimpse into the past which would expand their modern outlook. Beeson did not back up her claims with scientific evidence proving why a restoration would beneficial to the population, but she did an excellent job of addressing the how the human character would benefit from a historical restoration. Though the article is well written even by today’s standards the exclusion of scientific evidence explaining how the local ecosystem or human mind would improve as the result of a restoration leaves doubters with numerous areas of questioning. Regardless of dating in some areas the article still maintains a breath of relevance throughout its argument as there was never any use of derogatory or stereotypical language when discussing the Native Indian landmarks involved in the restoration and archeological digs. The inclusion of Native landmarks in the restoration and the exclusion of derogatory language lends a breadth of credibility to Beeson as it denounces certain critics who would profess that the restoration project would only glorify the history of Anglo Saxon European males who were considered superior at the