Richard Jarac's Acting Roles

In my perspective, Jaques is indeed correct when he affirms that everyone plays many acting roles throughout a lifetime. Life is certainly played out through a series of phases, or story lines, that seem to change the person and the purpose of their life at certain moments. You’re born a baby not able to walk, let alone talk one bit, but the baby is the first character, or actor throughout a lifetime. There are series of parts, or different roles throughout the entrance of the role as a baby, until old age and death exits our ending. The first role of the baby is the centerpiece of every role to come, as each role that comes after has just transformed from the one played previously, leading trails of previous roles. I believe these roles are played out in a way of expectations of humans, and what is right and socially acceptable. Speech, behavior, looks, and even a change of attire are all attributes toward the changing roles of a human’s lifetime.
ANALYSIS:
I strongly believe that the use of …show more content…
Richard III plays several roles throughout the play such as the lonely man, the vice, and the antagonist. Richard III starts off the play by being the “lonely and upset character” with nothing to lose that gives off a morose vibe (Richard III 1.1.1-41). Richard then immediately translates into the vice character that everyone enjoys and can’t help but like even though he has openly stated to the audience his plot to “when they are gone [murdered], then must I count my gains” (Richard III 1.1.144-162). He quickly translates into the antagonist as he plots is bloodshed rampage yet to come throughout the play (Richard III 1.1.162-163). In my opinion, I highly regard that Richard III would see himself as an actor on his way to the throne and power. Each of his roles results in his success in reaching the throne as well as his demise and collapsing of his ruling as