Rhetorical Analysis Of Henry David Thoreau's Resistance To Civil Government

Improved Essays
Henry David Thoreau’s essay, “Resistance to Civil Government” describes his beliefs on society and how a person's initial belief is the right one DOUBLE CHECK THIS. Thoreau's essay contains crucial rhetorical devices such as polysyndetons, rhetorical questions, and anaphoras, that help create a well-developed essay that clearly conveys Thoreau's message of individualism and only working to benefit the government.
(Indent)One of the rhetorical devices that Thoreau uses is polysyndeton, this slows the reader's pace, and allows them to fully understand the information and emphasize the importance of the message. For example, "If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself,". Thoreau's quote has many
…show more content…
Thoreau uses this to urge the reader to think deeper about society, yet broaden their perspective. The reader may be closed minded, thus Thoreau’s questions lead to contemplation of whether or not the reader should change their view on life. For example, Thoreau’s asks, “One would think, that a deliberate and practical denial of its authority was the only offense never contemplated by government; else, why has it not assigned its definite, its suitable and proportionate, penalty?” Thoreau carries on about the State and the power it has over people, he does not directly answer the question. Also, the questions are structured differently, at least lengthwise, which may represent a want to change society and in how people think. For instance, Thoreau believes that a person’s first thought is the best choice for them, and that they should not have complete faith in the government. Thoreau questions the government, or at least aspects of how the government rules. Because the government has such an influence, Thoreau asks the audience questions about society and life.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In a well known address, later altered into the article "Common Disobedience," Thoreau demanded that the administration's power is subject to its kin's assent. Furthermore, he demanded that equity was better than government expert. In this way, an individual has a privilege to survey whether a law fits in with the perfect of equity, and to revoke that law on the off chance that he esteems it unreasonable. One fundamental qualification which Thoreau makes, in any case, is that the offender must violate this law peacefully, and that he should acknowledge the punishment of his transgression. As such, he should will to serve imprison time, as opposed to lead an insubordination.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay Civil Disobedience is an essay written by Henry D. Thoreau in 1849. In his essay he uses rhetorical question to engage his audience, and he uses those questions to make a statement how a government should be run. Thoreau is quoted in the paper saying “I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least". Using this argument, Thoreau uses rhetorical questions to prompt the reader into thinking of the idea of rebellion. They are used well in the essay, because they display his pathos, logos, and ethos.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau was able to convey his thoughts in his work, "Civil Disobedience. " Thoreau believed his writing could persuade the general public to understand his comings. All of the author's works was treason and a criminal offense but there was a higher calling. They have devoted their life to matters much bigger than themselves.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argued against the government making their own decisions based of their own consciences, and not the people’s. Thoreau summarizes this with a quote, “That government is best which governs…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thoreau's rhetorical questions did show the audience how simple their choices were and prove a point, yet it was not as imperative to the effect as Kings…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau’s message is delivered to mankind in order to bring an end to a repressive government and bring the fall to this controversial decision that man is forced to decide upon. Society often tries to propose the solution of this government in a way outside of breaking the law. Thoreau explains that this cannot work by stating, “As for adopting the ways which the State has provided for remedying the evil, I know not of such ways. They take too much time, and a man's life will be gone. I have other affairs to attend to” (2).…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, born July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, was known to be an American transcendentalist and philosopher. Thoreau became known for the essay he wrote when he spent a night in jail due to his refusal to pay taxes in objection to slavery and the Mexican War. The essay was published and titled “Resistance of Civil Government” but also known as “Civil Disobedience.” It is unsurprising that the government is dirty and corrupt so the purpose of the essay was to influence readers to not fear but protest government laws and commands or vote them out.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It promotes prioritizing one 's consciousness over the law since government should be based upon conscience. He largely criticized the American social institutions and policies of the time, predominantly slavery and the Mexican American war, and in protest refused to pay his poll taxes. His justification was that if the government refused to improve their flawed manners then “"It is not a man 's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong” but it is “his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and...not to give it practically his support.” Thoreau exposes how government is an expedient which solely exists because the people have allowed this body to execute their will, though it is not immune to misuse. Government is meant to protect individual freedoms and so when these are infringed upon, man 's obligation is to ideologically detach himself from it.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much like Paine, Thoreau would not be bullied into violating what he believed to be right. Thoreau was also vehemently against slavery, something else he wrote about in Civil Disobedience. “There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them.” (1865) This could also be seen as a critique of society.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Here he indicates that society’s perspective has been corrupted by immorality; therefore, verifying his belief that society’s opinion is insufficient. Thoreau also supports this claim; however, he uses a different technique to disclose his conviction. He says, “I hesitate to burden my attention with those which are insignificant, which only a divine mind could illustrate”(4). Thoreau is saying that not only is society not adequate, but also, society does not possess the status or position that such an opinion requires. According to him, “only a divine mind”, has the right to speak out on what is an acceptable behavior.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Transcendentalism was a movement in mid-nineteenth century America that focused on an individual obtaining personal freedom from the constrictions of their surrounding society. Thus, it can be said that they pushed for social and political change to be achieved so that individualism would be prized over collectivism. Two writers, Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson, are at the frontline of these Transcendentalist views. These authors introduce a similar twist to the concept of personal freedom, claiming that a person can achieve it by encompassing oneself into nature.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Henry David Thoreau wrote in a time of change and ages past. Every era is opposed to the ones preceding and succeeding itself, but the Romantics were truly a group who hearkened to an old tune; one of integrated civilization and nature in medieval times. When he wrote Walden, Thoreau wrote about his own experiences in the natural world and how it changed him. In his writing, Thoreau explains why one should live deliberately. He actively argues to convince the reader to do so.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong. He claims the public must rely on their morals, and conscience to stand up to a government that does not rely on morals and…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He writes that he tries to give as little thought as possible to the government. Thoreau still believes that the government can improve; he gives credit to the Constitution, the law, the courts, and even the government, nothing that these are all things for which to be grateful. Democracy, though, is not the final step of achieving an ideal government; once the government realizes and values the role of the individual and his or her power, and treats him or her with the required respect, it will be able to advance and change for the better. To concretize his point and make it relatable to readers, Thoreau uses metaphor, a rhetorical device that compares two objects, to prove a point. In “Civil Disobedience”, he employs this device in order to prove a point about the government; by comparing the government to objects, Thoreau subtly acknowledges its incompetence and uselessness.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays