Essay Comparing Letter From Birmingham Jail And Civil Disobedience

Improved Essays
Both of the essays “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther king Jr. and “Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau (1849) showed their understanding about civil disobedience multiple times. Their purpose of their essays was to argue for the right to disobey authority if there is social injustice.

In “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King Jr. took direct action rather than waiting, potentially forever, for justice to come through the courts. King also analyzes the duty and the responsibility of the citizens to protest and to takes action against corrupt laws of the government. When talking about resistance to unjust laws, King writes, “So the question is not whether we will be extremist but what kind of extremist will we be. Will we be extremists for hate or will we be extremists for love? Will we be
…show more content…
Thoreau states that a government is the accomplishment of the work for when it was created. It is the sole purpose of being certain of individual freedom. He later states that he simply wants a better government. The government rarely proves itself and that it deserves its power. For example, Thoreau states, “The best government is the government that governs least.” Speaks in favor of government that does not intrude upon men’s lives. Some governments show a reason of how successfully men can be imposed on or even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. Thoreau focuses on the U.S citizens, foremost intellectuals in the East and North of the United States. Thoreau’s audience focuses on the U.S citizens because he often writes of the injustice that the government exhibits towards its people. For instance, Thoreau writes, “why does it not encourage its citizens to be on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would have on them?” This shows how the government does not encourage its citizens to be watchful to point out all of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis of Letter From a Birmingham Jail In 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. was asked to go to Birmingham to engage in a nonviolent direct-action program and was arrested as a result of this protest. A letter from several clergymen arrived to him during his incarceration criticizing his work as untimely and unwise. Martin Luther King responded to their critique in a “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” and explained the necessity of his presence. He explains that his actions were thoroughly planned out.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King’s letter from the Birmingham jail was a detailed letter explaining the motives and emotion behind the non-violent protests that took place in the South. As a result of these protests, a few white religious leaders criticized the actions of Dr. King and those encouraging the non-violent campaigns. The purpose of this letter was to respond to criticism made by these leaders. In the letter Dr. King expounded on four of the leaders’ comments. He responded to the comments regarding the untimeliness of the campaigns, the willingness of the campaigners to break laws, the allegation that the campaigns triggered violence, and the description of the campaigns as extreme.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Thoreau, author of the lecture “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” discusses "That government is best which governs least"(Thoreau). That means that the best government is one that is barely involved or not at all. Thoreau brings forth his message with rhetorical questions and anaphora. Overall, both authors do a great job of developing their pieces and presenting their methods conveyed within their pieces; however, Martin Luther King Jr.’s piece was more effective. King’s piece was more…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King’s letter was not an innocent appeal, it was designed for manipulation. First, he defended his very presence in Birmingham by taking advantage of the patriotism that brought citizens from every state together to be American. He then listed in vibrant detail the injustices, past and present, heaped upon the backs of the African American race. King stood behind the civil disobedience that his group practiced with an explanation of his meaning of “unjust laws.” He refuted the claim that he and his followers were extremists by twisting the definition favorably in his direction.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong. He claims the public must rely on their morals, and conscience to stand up to a government that does not rely on morals and…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Primary Source Analysis Martin Luther King, Jr. seldom had time to answer his critics. But on April 16, 1963, he was confined to the Birmingham jail, imprisoned for participating in civil rights demonstrations. “Alone for days in the dull monotony of a narrow jail cell,” King pondered a letter titled A Call for Unity that fellow clergymen had published pressing him to drop his crusade of nonviolent resistance and to leave the battle for racial equality to the courts. Within that document, King’s fellow clergymen caste him as an ‘outsider’ and ‘extremist’ interfering with life in the City of Birmingham.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau’s message is delivered to mankind in order to bring an end to a repressive government and bring the fall to this controversial decision that man is forced to decide upon. Society often tries to propose the solution of this government in a way outside of breaking the law. Thoreau explains that this cannot work by stating, “As for adopting the ways which the State has provided for remedying the evil, I know not of such ways. They take too much time, and a man's life will be gone. I have other affairs to attend to” (2).…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, born July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, was known to be an American transcendentalist and philosopher. Thoreau became known for the essay he wrote when he spent a night in jail due to his refusal to pay taxes in objection to slavery and the Mexican War. The essay was published and titled “Resistance of Civil Government” but also known as “Civil Disobedience.” It is unsurprising that the government is dirty and corrupt so the purpose of the essay was to influence readers to not fear but protest government laws and commands or vote them out.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this next section Martin Luther King Jr. makes the argument that some laws meant to be broken; to do so he, defines just and unjust laws and also provides proper examples. King defines just law as “a man-made code that squares with the moral law;” it is a law that is equally upheld by both majority and minority groups (804). He goes on to define unjust laws as “any law that degrades human personality” (804). By accurately defining the difference between just and unjust laws, it sets up the tone for his argument on why it is acceptable to support some laws and disobey others. He wishes to convey the idea that just because a law is put in place by a government, that does not always deem them reasonable and without corruption.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thoreau wanted to alter the government because he said the government should just be a “wooden gun,” a tool for the people to use to their benefit. It is also appropriate to go against the government if the government is executing a plan that could end catastrophically. Studs Terkel focuses his attention onto the government’s errors in his piece, “Touching Thirty (Sam Lovejoy),” by drawing attention to the dangers of nuclear power to humans. Terkel showed that government can be reshaped through a change of mindset about a specific subject, such as nuclear power, which altered the schedule of the Montague plant in his town. Thomas Paine once said, “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It also helps to illustrate the wrongdoings of the government, most likely evoking a realization the system needs to change. Although Thoreau hasn’t identified specific issues yet, he has hooked the reader in, already causing them to feel as though something needs to be reformed. Later on, through the use of rhetorical questions, Thoreau hones in on specific affairs, catching the focus of the reader and thus prompting specific solutions. He asks, “Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?” Thoreau goes on to describe the importance of a conscience, and the ways in which the country’s conscience has failed, chiefly with the presence of slaves and the Mexican-American War.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argued against the government making their own decisions based of their own consciences, and not the people’s. Thoreau summarizes this with a quote, “That government is best which governs…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both great literary figures in the United States, yet they lived in different time periods. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and King’s Letter to Birmingham Jail”are quite similar, in addition obtain certain differences between the texts. Both writers demonstrate each other 's audience on ways of being civilly disobedient towards their corrupt government and how to have a relationship with them. On the other hand, certain differences, both texts possess are whom it was addressed to as well as the occasions and appeal. Both texts fractions in similarities and differences through their analysis, such as occasion, strategies used, and other figures used in their writings.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He incorporates an antithesis which supports his belief that government is bad and the virtuous man is good. Likewise, the virtuous individual is discouraged by an amoral government, but the amoral government should be discouraged by the virtuous individual. This antithesis serves to profess who is inclined to be disobedient. Thoreau also used aphorisms such as “it is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right.” His aphorisms teach his audience the moral and universal truths embedded in his message.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays