White. Black. Gay. Straight. AIDs is a perpetrator blinded from one’s characteristics. However in America, its victims are left to fend for themselves. In the speech “The Whisper of AIDs”, Mary Fischer uses strikingly sentimental rhetoric in order to effectively make the claim that AIDs still persists as an epidemic.
Fisher warrants that politicians simply politicize the disease. She stresses “It does not care whether you are Democrat or Republican; it does not ask whether you are black or white.” By employing personification, politicians evaluate their political approach on AIDs. Where for the average American, the realization of AIDs actuality clarifies many hazy perspectives. The repetition of “Though I am” equalizes all victims by showing how they are one in the same. Fischer convinces Americans that AIDs is relevant within society. She demonstrates that AIDs should not be a political talking point, but a problem that is actively resolved.
Stickler 2 …show more content…
Fischer hits home for many with the statistic, “AIDs is the third leading killer of young adult Americans”. A strong sense of AIDs reality is developed among those who push the issue aside. Fischer offers solid evidence that AIDs has an overarching presents. With the large amount of those AIDs impacts, she makes the average American think on the true meaning of humanity with the rhetorical question “are you human?”. Moral ground is established on the simplicity of human life. As the audience can not help but reflect on the rudimentary aspects of a human, they realize how AIDs is not a mystery. It is real and evident in the lives of
Fisher warrants that politicians simply politicize the disease. She stresses “It does not care whether you are Democrat or Republican; it does not ask whether you are black or white.” By employing personification, politicians evaluate their political approach on AIDs. Where for the average American, the realization of AIDs actuality clarifies many hazy perspectives. The repetition of “Though I am” equalizes all victims by showing how they are one in the same. Fischer convinces Americans that AIDs is relevant within society. She demonstrates that AIDs should not be a political talking point, but a problem that is actively resolved.
Stickler 2 …show more content…
Fischer hits home for many with the statistic, “AIDs is the third leading killer of young adult Americans”. A strong sense of AIDs reality is developed among those who push the issue aside. Fischer offers solid evidence that AIDs has an overarching presents. With the large amount of those AIDs impacts, she makes the average American think on the true meaning of humanity with the rhetorical question “are you human?”. Moral ground is established on the simplicity of human life. As the audience can not help but reflect on the rudimentary aspects of a human, they realize how AIDs is not a mystery. It is real and evident in the lives of