• Home Page
  • Response To John Stuart Mill's 'Autobiography'

Response To John Stuart Mill's 'Autobiography'

Improved Essays
Show More
In the paragraph written by John Stuart Mill from his book Autobiography. Chapter V, he argues that when you make the enjoyment of happiness an important thing, it doesn’t seem to make you as happy. I disagree with this because I think that you should enjoy every little thing that happens to you. If something good happens, then enjoy that and let it keep you happy for a long time. Don’t take any happy moment for granted. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that you should only care about your happiness, you should also care about other people’s happiness. Don’t try to only make yourself happy, help others. If you have a happy moment though, enjoy it but don’t brag. It’s always good to stay humble.

In the Mill article, he states the following “the enjoyments of life (such was now my theory) are sufficient to make it a pleasant thing, when they are taken en passant, without being made a principle object.Once make them so, they are immediately felt to be insufficient” (Mill 1). What this basically means is that you enjoy more things in life when you don’t make them an important thing because once you do so, they will be inadequate. I disagree with this because I believe you should enjoy everything no matter what. Be happy, because in moments of sorrow you will miss being happy. Life is very short so live life happy. People tend to like …show more content…
McMahon. In the article “In Pursuit of Unhappiness” the author suggests to “have dinner with your family or walk in the park with your friends”(McMahon 12). He believes that by doing so you’ll find happiness. I partially agree with him because spending time with your friends and being around the people you love does make you happy. Sometimes people are happier alone. Everyone is different, everyone has different personalities. Different things make people happy. What makes me happy probably won’t make you

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Similarities Between Mill And Aristotle
    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Similarities Between Mill And Aristotle

    Mill believes that pleasure is something that can bring good things to people and thereby bringing good things…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness Begley Summary
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Happiness Begley Summary

    Sharon Begley’s literary article Happiness: Enough Already claims that happiness is an emotion that can both bring us success in life and act as a barrier that can block us from achieving said success. Eric Wilson found this out to be true after reading numerous self-help books on how to become happier. University of Illinois psychologist Ed Diener also found this out after speaking with the Scottish parliament where was told that too much happiness is not good for the public. In fact, Diener’s journal Perspectives on Psychological Science states that “once a moderate level of happiness is achieved, further increases can sometimes be detrimental to income, career success, education and political participation” (Pg 455). Both Wilson and Diener…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Emerson And Thoreau's Transcendentalism: Are You Living Life, Right?
    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emerson And Thoreau's Transcendentalism: Are You Living Life, Right?

    Are you living life, right? What if someone told you that you were doing this whole life thing wrong all along? In reading the writings of transcendentalist, ones perception of life may be completely altered. The comparing and contrasting of modern day Americans lives and how that should, can be eye-opening.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Characteristics Of John Stuart Mill's Genius And Originality
    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Characteristics Of John Stuart Mill's Genius And Originality

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Pursuit Of Happiness: Can Money Buy Happiness?
    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Pursuit Of Happiness: Can Money Buy Happiness?

    Everyone wants to become happy, but not everyone views happiness the same way; we all have our own unique…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Communist Manifesto And John Stuart Mill
    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Communist Manifesto And John Stuart Mill

    Mill’s On Liberty and Marx’s The Communist Manifesto are both political works about how they believe the government should be run in which they both believe that the people should not be oppressed by the government or other people. However, both differ in their opinions of what type of form a government should be; Mill believes that the government should take on the form of liberalism where it plays a limited role on society that emphasizes on individual freedom and freedom from tyranny of the majority. Marx on the other hand, believes that communism is an ideal form for a government where it will emphasize equality for the people that will eliminate exploitation among one group of people over another. While Mill believes human nature is detached…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Argument
    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Argument

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of John Stuart Mill And Friedrich Nietzsche
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of John Stuart Mill And Friedrich Nietzsche

    John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Nietzsche both analyzed the outlooks fostered by the ancients, Christianity and modern morality in regard to the qualities of character that each group developed. The two men held similar views regarding the Christians and modern morality believing that each was creating a herd like mentality where individualism was being suppressed. The two interestingly differed on their view of the ancients, where Nietzsche disagreed with their rationality, Mill praised their individualism. For starters, Nietzsche viewed the character that each society developed in the context of whether or not they fostered the will to power. Will to power for Nietzsche was the driving force of man, and he believed that any hindrance or alteration…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Is The Greatest Happiness Principle, By John Stuart Mill
    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism Is The Greatest Happiness Principle, By John Stuart Mill

    Happiness is desired by many as an end result, but Mill does not explain it with a clear and cogent…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill's The Argument Of Utilitarianism
    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's The Argument Of Utilitarianism

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill Right And Wrong Analysis
    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Right And Wrong Analysis

    The criterion of right and wrong controversy has yet to be concluded though many years of argumentation have ensued. Mill attempts to explain the criterion of right and wrong using the concept of utilitarianism. Utility is not something that should be contrasted with pleasure, but rather pleasure itself with the freedom of pain. The criterion of right and wrongness is introduced for utility as the actions are right in proportion if they promote happiness and are wrong in proportion if they produced the reverse of happiness. Happiness is defined by pleasure and the absence of pain and unhappiness is vice versa.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Diversity In Fahrenheit 451
    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Diversity In Fahrenheit 451

    The novel Fahrenheit 451 written by Ray Bradbury, a piece of literature that has something strange. It creates a proposal for what our society would be if it was able to reach the limits, not only technological but also social and ideological. Society is subject to a regime in which helps to create an organized culture in order to have " happiness " the ideologies of Communism and capitalism were in a battle to impose their ways of thinking. This is wrong because the happiness of each person depends mainly on your tastes and preferences, this is what makes our world work " diversity " of thoughts and ideas different but with a common purpose, good and healthy coexistence.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill
    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill

    This proposes that the only one’s who can determine the significance of a certain pleasure must be one who has experienced both the high and low pleasures of life. The issue with this is that Mill seems to believe that those who prefer the more physical, lower quality pleasures…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill: The Morality Of Chapter 2 Of Utilitarianism
    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill: The Morality Of Chapter 2 Of Utilitarianism

    Mill then tells of the condition of happiness: happiness is not a continuous state of pleasure, but rather “the occasional brilliant flash if enjoyment” (12) because if happiness is a continuous state, it would most definitely be unattainable. He later addresses that humans can do without happiness, but it is unnecessary unless doing so is an action of self-sacrifice that is intended towards promoting happiness. This shows that happiness is inherent and…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings