Love And Justice Analysis

Superior Essays
How love and justice relate to each other? There are three views: “[Love and Justice] are opposed, but they focus on one or the other”, “they are opposed but they try to hold them in tension”, or “they are complementary and need one another.”
Most people follow the assertion that love and justice go together, and they cannot be separated from each other. However, the people who believe that justice is the what they deserve from what they did, they are on the side of love and justice are opposed one another.
Reinhold Niebuhr is one of the ethicist to believe that justice and love are opposed one another. Niebuhr believes that love and justice is the different spirit of life. Niebuhr’s understanding of love is only Jesus can do, and the human beings can do the closest thing that social relationship among human beings, but not the love like Jesus did. Niebuhr’s understanding of love is sacrificial love. Niebuhr’s understanding of justice is the same as his understanding of love. He believes that “the ideal of justice society can’t be completely […] justice [in the society] that is only justice is less than justice.” However, he believes that love, human being tries, makes justice in the society, although justice,
…show more content…
I am wondering about the contradiction of Niebuhr’s statements. His idea about the sacrificial love, sinful human being, and justice has a contradiction to justify the using power. How sinful human being can make justice in the society by using the power of sacrificial love, which we cannot do as Niebuhr

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi's Code: Was It Just? Just image that you have knocked out the eye of a free man, your eye shall be knocked out too. Is that fair? Hammurabi was the king of Babylonia, around 1750 BCE. When Hammurabi became king, he was believed to get his powers from the gods.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice approach stems from the Aristotelian philosophy where it is stated that “equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally”. The justice model of ethical decision-making can be described as “moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims. Hence, when making the decision, the individual should assess how fair the action will be and if it could potentially discriminate and show favouritism. Discrimination by definition “imposes burden on people who are no different from those on whom burden are not imposed”. Favouritism, on the other hand, provides benefits to a certain group of people, without a justifiable reason.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maimonides’ theologically-inspired interpretation of rule-utilitarianism draws in foundation from a precept he devotes much ink to settling the merits of: The True Law [the six hundred and thirteen commandments of the Torah] … give[s] us the twofold perfection. It aims first at the establishment of good mutual relations among men by removing injustice and creating the noblest feelings. In this way the people … stay and continue in one condition, and every one can acquire his first perfection [well-being of the body].…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grisel S. Estevez The Justice That Never Was Undoubtedly, justice is an exceptionally complex theme. In fact, there are countless methods of interpreting the word, but the most significant one is fairness. In the context of the novel, Frankenstein, there are numerous instances of characters endeavours to search for their own means of getting justice. To illustrate, an example of this would be Victor Frankenstein's sentient creation. Indeed, the creature is a rather intricate character whose perspective and emotions develops throughout the story from an innocent soul to a vengeful murder.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He looks at empirical causes to explain the existence of morality in order to reason why it is the way it is. When analyzing his work, would seem like Nietzsche has a hollow concept of justice. What only every seems to be just is what the current laws that exists advocate for. There does not seems to be anything more or anything less to the statement. There is nothing grandeur to justice because the meaning can change just as easily as…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon Vs Socrates

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Imagine a man that always donate clothes and feeds the homeless. This man regularly visits children with terminal illnesses and is one of the largest donors to Susan G. Komen for the Cure non-profit organization. He is viewed by tens of thousands as a saint, heaven sent or a reincarnation of Jesus himself. A just man in the eyes of many, but this man has twisted dark secrets; which involve human trafficking, murder of any competitor and extortion of politicians. The man is an unjust person by nature but is viewed as just.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. However, achieving the result that one is seeking through such means can take years and require perseverance, determination and unfailing dedication to the cause. In addition, operating within a fundamentally just government, or a free society, is significant for this to proceed successfully because it suggests that a sound foundation already exists from which growth may evolve. Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. clearly stated his beliefs regarding “just and unjust” laws in his famous “Letter from the Birmingham Jail.”…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Justice is something that everyone in this world desires to have. By having justice everything in the world must be going right, but there is also injustice which sometimes is wrongly received. Nobody gets to choose if you get to live a good or bad life that is up to you. In this novel of Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a creature or monster as it’s said in the book.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nietzsche acknowledges the benefits which have stemmed from Christian slave morality, such as depth, accountability, and responsibility, but feels they are undermined by the guilt, nihilism, and ressentement it associated with them. In his writing he infers the importance of this morality as a form of enhancement of the capacities of man. However, he considers it more of an obstacle…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, ethnicity is a fundamental factor that governs an individual some way or another influencing one to ‘pick up the pen’ and write on the experiences associated. Reading is the backbone of knowledge, perspectives and values while writing is the ability to explore values and experiences that characterise an individual. Through reading, an individual is able to live vicariously through the composer, which develops sympathy, widens an individual’s perspective, to reduce the amount of injustices conquered around the globe. In the short story by Nam Le, “Love and Honour and Pity and Pride and Compassion and Sacrifice” reinforces that culture can significantly impact the formation of identity which forms the context of the composer, influencing…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the early 19th a philosopher born in Roeken, Germany showed a promising career as a philosopher. His name is Friedrich Nietzsche. He attacked morality, especially Christianity by considering a convenient tool used between groups to extend control over each other. Nietzsche’s notion of power placed him as one of the most assertive philosopher in criticizing morality. He did not know how much his ideas would travel through time and space.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his book, The Republic, Plato, a Greek philosopher, engages in conversation with his teacher Socrates. They come across the questions of “What is justice?” and “What is just?”. And throughout the first two books of the The Republic, many definitions of what justice is are thrown out by other philosophers, and Socrates always has an example to challenge each one. In the first book, three possible definitions are set out, and then in book two the argument of whether it is more profitable to be unjust or just is laid out.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is a term that people use to describe as an act or behavior that represents the good people present to others and themselves. It serves as a moral high ground that people strive to be, although sometimes these thoughts can be twisted into its opposite and cause pain, anger, and other negative emotions and acts arise within people. This pain erupts into what is known as injustice and is the epitome of what people should not strive for due it bringing so much negativity. It is a moral choice that no one what’s to make due to the label that it puts on them making them into monsters in the eyes of others due to what they believe could have been done. Although, in some cases, injustice is sometimes the best choice in the matter if one is…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Hart-Fuller debate is arguably one of the most interesting and contentious debates in jurisprudence. The debate clearly highlights the divide between two jurisprudential schools of thought: legal positivism and natural law, particularly in the context of Nazi laws. The multitudinous nature of jurisprudential inquiry concerning the relationship between law and morality allows for numerous conflicting interpretations and opinions. Therefore, it is important to limit the scope of this essay.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays