It is not as simple as prescribing the patient a drug, and this book was about a time where physicians did not have a type of drug that could fight the plague. All these doctors had were half baked theories on the way it was transmitted and how to avoid it. Even then, when Doctor Hoffman found positive tests for the plague in patients, other doctors met that with skepticism because using a microscope was still a relatively new way of diagnosing diseases and often many older doctors did not believe in it. There was more parts to the book not outlined in this review, but for me the most important part was the way Mohr wrote about the socioeconomic classes and how everything stockpiled against the doctors and their fight against the plague. We see too often the science behind it, and how doctors advanced their technology, but the thing that is surprisingly lacking is the effect that people had in the hindrance and the advancement of the medical
It is not as simple as prescribing the patient a drug, and this book was about a time where physicians did not have a type of drug that could fight the plague. All these doctors had were half baked theories on the way it was transmitted and how to avoid it. Even then, when Doctor Hoffman found positive tests for the plague in patients, other doctors met that with skepticism because using a microscope was still a relatively new way of diagnosing diseases and often many older doctors did not believe in it. There was more parts to the book not outlined in this review, but for me the most important part was the way Mohr wrote about the socioeconomic classes and how everything stockpiled against the doctors and their fight against the plague. We see too often the science behind it, and how doctors advanced their technology, but the thing that is surprisingly lacking is the effect that people had in the hindrance and the advancement of the medical